http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Lynne Pearce (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
An Interview with Lynne Pearce
Lynne Pearce ; Jinhyoung Lee Academy of Mobility Humanities 2023 Mobility Humanities Vol.2 No.2
Lynne Pearce is Professor of Literary and Cultural Theory in the Department of English Literature and Creative Writing at Lancaster University, UK. She is also Co-Director (Humanities) of the University’s Centre for Mobilities Research (CeMoRe) and has been involved in the Centre as an Associate Director since 2015. With Peter Merriman (Aberystwyth University, UK), she has played a leading role in developing the field of Mobility Humanities following a landmark colloquium hosted by CeMoRe in 2014 (see special issue of Mobilities12.4). While her early publications were in the field of feminist theory and reader theory (e.g., Woman/Image/Text (1991); Reading Dialogics(1994); Feminism and the Politics of Reading (1997); Romance Writing (2007)), since 2010 her research has focused on mobilities (see Drivetime (2016) and Mobility, Memory and the Lifecourse (2019)). She is also co-editor of the book series Palgrave Studies in Mobilities, Literature and Culture.
-
Introduction: Mobility and the Making of Memories
Lynne Pearce Academy of Mobility Humanities 2022 Mobility Humanities Vol.1 No.2
Mobility and memory articulate in numerous ways—and yet, until now, there has been no dedicated attempt to reflect upon the implications of this special relationship within the field of mobilities studies. My own work in the field—which straddles the disciplines of literary and cultural studies, sociology and cultural geography—suggests the reason for this lies primarily with the contemporaneity of the most influential mobilities scholarship to date. The research led by social scientists, in particular, has been preoccupied with analyses of the contemporary world in relation to the future rather than the past (including the definition of the new mobilities paradigm [“NMP”] itself by Sheller and Urry in 2006 [Sheller and Urry; Urry]). This is despite the fact that others working within the field, such as Colin Pooley (whose work is featured in this special issue), have long shown how the mobility tipping points of history echo and foreshadow those taking place today (e.g., Pooley; Pooley, Turnbull and Adams). While there is, of course, no necessary connection between historical research and the practice of personal and/or collective memory per se, an interest in thinking-backwards as well as thinking-forwards with respect to the operation of the mobilities paradigm is helpful. In this regard, the work of geographers and historians working within the mobilities field has been an especially important counterweight to the “futures-thinking” of the social scientists with innovative “retrospective” research on (for example): the mobilities of loss, grief and mourning (e.g., Maddrell, “Living with the Deceased” and “Mapping Grief”); family and social mobility (e.g., Holdsworth); and the legacies of Empire across a range of settings and applications (e.g., Clarsen; Coleborne, Insanity and “Consorting with ‘Others”’; Lambert and Merriman). Whether explicitly or implicitly, these subfields also engage with the issue of how we, as individuals and communities, access and remember the past through complex processes of memory and memorialisation
-
Stefani Frost,Parisa Ziarati,Ryan Moen,Lynn Kysh,Robert Johnson,Shane Pearce,Siamak Daneshmand,Kimberly D. Siegmund,Victoria K. Cortessis 대한비뇨기종양학회 2024 대한비뇨기종양학회지 Vol.22 No.1
Purpose: Diabetes mellitus, a frequent comorbid condition in cancer patients, has been shown to increase risk of all-site cancer mortality. This relationship has not been systematically studied in bladder cancer patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify, evaluate, and synthesize available evidence on the relationship between history of diabetes and outcomes in bladder cancer patients. Materials and Methods: Systematic searches interrogated OVID MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify scholarly reports relating diabetes to all-cause mortality, bladder cancer-specific mortality, recurrence, and progression in bladder cancer patients. After critical review, metaanalysis was used to quantitively synthesize qualifying data and assess potential influence of publication bias, clinical heterogeneity, and residual confounding. Results: We synthesized data on over 226,472 patients treated with curative intent uniquely represented in 28 studies that met quality metrics. Having diabetes was positively associated with each outcome. Hazard ratio estimates were indistinguishable for mortality from any cause, 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12–1.33) and bladder cancer-specific mortality, 1.28 (95% CI 1.17–1.41) and notably stronger in patients with muscle-invasive and high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.15–1.50) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.06–2.06). Neither publication bias, systematic error, nor confounding by factors such as smoking or obesity is likely to explain the observed associations. Conclusions: Bladder cancer patients with diabetes experience elevated mortality that is not explained by diabetes-related comorbidities or complications. Future research should explore type, severity, and duration of diabetes in relation to unfavorable bladder cancer outcomes.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
