http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Karol Zakowski (검색결과 4 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Zakowski, Karol World Association for Triple Helix and Future Stra 2012 Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia Vol.11 No.2
Sino-Japanese relations suffered a great setback during the premiership of Koizumi $Jun'ichir{\bar{o}}$ (2001-2006). Although many factors, such as dispute over the resources of the East China Sea or Japan's anxiety about China's growing military expenditures, are accountable for this situation, it was Koizumi's visits to the Yasukuni Shrine that became a symbol of the controversies between the two countries. The Yasukuni issue triggered a real eruption of profound anti-Japanese feelings among the Chinese people. While commentators in China accused Koizumi of glorifying militarism and whitewashing the atrocities committed by Japanese soldiers during the Second World War, the Japanese public started perceiving China's "exaggerated" reaction as a convenient diplomatic tool used by China to apply pressure on Japan in other bilateral disputes. On the one hand, spontaneous protests against Koizumi's visits to the Yasukuni Shrine constituted a great constraint in China's diplomacy towards Japan, but on the other, they also became an ideal pretext for adopting a tougher stance in Chinese foreign policy. In this paper, I examine different points of view on the Yasukuni issue. After describing the Japanese background of the visits to the controversial shrine, I analyze various interpretations of China's reaction to the problem. Although emotions dominated discourse on the Yasukuni issue both in Japan and China, some pragmatic attempts to use this problem can still be seen. Besides being a side-effect of Koizumi's strong personality, the Yasukuni issue could be used either as a tool of factional struggle in the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) or as an instrument of Chinese foreign policy towards Japan.
-
Evolution of the Japanese Political Scene: Toward a Non-Issue-Oriented Two-Party System?
Karol Zakowski 서울대학교행정대학원 2011 Asian Journal of Political Science Vol.19 No.2
This article examines the nature of the two-party system in Japan. The electoral reformof 1994 has finally led to an alternation of power, but contrary to the predictions of thereformers, the competition between two major Japanese parties is not based on anysubstantial differences in their political programs. The Liberal Democratic Party and theDemocratic Party of Japan are mixtures of various groups rather than coherent parties andthe main axes of struggle on the Japanese political scene run across party divisions. Bothmajor parties are internally divided with regard to economic as well as defense policy. Themost important factor of Democratic Party of Japan’s identity has been the goal ofachieving an alternation of power and abolishing the Liberal Democratic Party style ofpolicymaking. Nevertheless, the discourse on political renewal has been undertaken also bythe Liberal Democratic Party. While the struggle between the partisans and the opponentsof Koizumi reforms continues in the Liberal Democratic Party, the Democratic Party ofJapan is torn apart between the proponents of ‘big’ and ‘small’ government.
-
Karol Zakowski 인하대학교 국제관계연구소 2019 Pacific Focus Vol.34 No.3
The aim of this article is to analyze the influence of Prime Minister AbeShinzo’s nationalist stance on Japan’s policy towards China from a neo-classical realist perspective. It is argued that the extent to which Abe’sideological leaning exerted impact on foreign policy making depended onexternal stimuli, as well as Abe’s domestic political interests. Prime Minis-ter Abe generally perceived China as a threat to Japan, and remainedassertive towards it, but he also pragmatically displayedflexibility in suchareas as history issues, security policy, and territorial dispute. This articleanalyzes these complex developments in light of the changes in interna-tional environment and domestic politics, examining three periods: Abe’sfirst administration (2006–2007); the escalation of diplomatic disputes withChina (2012–2014); and gradual rapprochement with China (since 2014).It is concluded that the nationalist beliefs of decision makers affect foreignpolicy to the greatest extent whenever they are in line with other kinds ofvariables, such as external pressures and domestic interests
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
