http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Jason Lai,Benjamin Holden Schnapp,David Simon Tillman,Mary Westergaard,Jamie Hess,Aaron Kraut 한국보건의료인국가시험원 2020 보건의료교육평가 Vol.17 No.-
Purpose: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires all residency programs to provide increasing autonomy as residents progress through training, known as graded responsibility. However, there is little guidance on how to implement graded responsibility in practice and a paucity of literature on how it is currently implemented in emergency medicine (EM). Wesought to determine how EM residency programs apply graded responsibility across a variety of activities and to identify which considerations are important in affording additional responsibilities to trainees. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of EM residency programs using a 23-question survey that was distributed by email to162 ACGME-accredited EM program directors. Seven different domains of practice were queried. Results: We received 91 responses (56.2% response rate) to the survey. Among all domains of practice except for managing critically illmedical patients, the use of graded responsibility exceeded 50% of surveyed programs. When graded responsibility was applied,post-graduate year (PGY) level was ranked an “extremely important” or “very important” consideration between 80.9% and 100.0% ofthe time. Conclusion: The majority of EM residency programs are implementing graded responsibility within most domains of practice. Whendecisions are made surrounding graded responsibility, programs still rely heavily on the time-based model of PGY level to determineadvancement.