RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        A Comparison of Diabetes Self-Care Ability Scores Among Inhabitants of Urban and Rural Areas and a Group of Company Employees

        Hiroko Takizawa,Tanji Hoshi 서울시립대학교 도시과학연구원 2010 도시과학국제저널 Vol.14 No.1

        A secondary statistical analysis of data from a study to develop a self-rating scale for assessing the learning processes of self-care ability for diabetes prevention is reported (Takizawa, 2006). The data of 227 participants consisted of 3 groups: urban inhabitants, rural inhabitants, and company employees. The differences among the groups are presented. Significant differences were found in scores obtained from the subscales of “Approach Families/Community” and “Adequacy of Rest.” A path analysis revealed the following same learning procedure among the groups: “Interest” → “Understand” → “Explore and Determine” → “Implement, Monitor” → “Approach Families/Community.” Statistically, there are no differences in path coefficients among the 3 groups, which suggest a possibility that the preceding stage of the learning process progressed without regard to urban or rural areas or labor status. Many more subjects are required for an examination of the generalized results of this research, including cross-cultural influences. A secondary statistical analysis of data from a study to develop a self-rating scale for assessing the learning processes of self-care ability for diabetes prevention is reported (Takizawa, 2006). The data of 227 participants consisted of 3 groups: urban inhabitants, rural inhabitants, and company employees. The differences among the groups are presented. Significant differences were found in scores obtained from the subscales of “Approach Families/Community” and “Adequacy of Rest.” A path analysis revealed the following same learning procedure among the groups: “Interest” → “Understand” → “Explore and Determine” → “Implement, Monitor” → “Approach Families/Community.” Statistically, there are no differences in path coefficients among the 3 groups, which suggest a possibility that the preceding stage of the learning process progressed without regard to urban or rural areas or labor status. Many more subjects are required for an examination of the generalized results of this research, including cross-cultural influences.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼