RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Leadership and Commitment: The United States and the Future of the Northeast Asian Order

        Carol Atkinson,Giacomo Chiozza 인하대학교 국제관계연구소 2011 Pacific Focus Vol.26 No.3

        Since the end of World War II, peace, prosperity, and democracy have flourished in Northeast Asia in large part due to the United States willingness to devote extraordinary resources and exert leadership through a series of bilateral commitments to the nations of the region. In the past two decades, crises in other parts of the world have captured U.S. attention and resources: in Eastern Europe after the fall of the Soviet Union and now in the Middle East. What are the consequences of these demands on how the United States envisions its future role in Northeast Asia? We assess these consequences by evaluating the strategies that the United States has elaborated for the region and how those strategies resonate with people in the United States and in the region. Our analysis focuses on two questions: How does the United States envision its role in Northeast Asia? Does the United States have the political will to bear the costs to fulfill this role? We argue that despite increased demands on its attention and resources, the United States remains firmly committed to its leadership role in the region and the U.S. centric security architecture of bilateral institutions. Multilateral institutions will remain relatively ineffective and inefficient in addressing the most pressing regional issues.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼