http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Kumar, S K,Dimopoulos, M A,Kastritis, E,Terpos, E,Nahi, H,Goldschmidt, H,Hillengass, J,Leleu, X,Beksac, M,Alsina, M,Oriol, A,Cavo, M,Ocio, E M,Mateos, M V,O'Donnell, E K,Vij, R,Lokhorst, H M,van de Do Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nat 2017 Leukemia Vol.31 No.11
<P>Introduction of new myeloma therapies offers new options for patients refractory to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PIs). In this multicenter study, patients with relapsed multiple myeloma, who have received at least three prior lines of therapy, are refractory to both an IMiD (lenalidomide or pomalidomide) and a PI (bortezomib or carfilzomib), and have been exposed to an alkylating agent were identified. The time patients met the above criteria was defined as time zero (T-0). Five hundred and forty-three patients diagnosed between 2006 and 2014 were enrolled in this study. Median age at T-0 was 62 years (range 31-87); 61% were males. The median duration between diagnosis and T-0 was 3.1 years. The median number of lines of therapy before T-0 was 4 (range 3-13). The median overall survival (OS) from T-0 for the entire cohort was 13 (95% confidence interval (CI) 11, 15) months. At least one regimen recorded after T-0 in 462 (85%) patients, with a median (95% CI) progression-free survival and OS from T-0 of 5 (4, 6), and 15.2 (13, 17) months, respectively. The study provides the expected outcome of relapsed multiple myeloma that is refractory to a PI and an IMiD, a benchmark for comparison of new therapies being evaluated.</P>