RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        유아의 창의,인성리더십 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발에 관한 사례연구: 인내

        최현혜 ( Hyun Hye Choi ),이소희 ( So Hee Lee ) 대한아동복지학회 2014 아동복지연구 Vol.12 No.3

        The purpose of this study is to develop an assessment that helps to understand and assess the creativity-character leadership of young children. In particular, this study chooses one of the creativity-character leadership behaviors-patience-as its main topic and develops its rubric with a case study. The results of the rubric development in this study are as follows: This research practiced a ‘stop-think-do’ program with assessment categories from previous studies. To present an assessment category reflecting actual creativity-character leadership behavior, a ‘marshmallow study’ was performed. The subjects of the study were 104 children aged 3 to 5 years old in four kindergartens in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. The result of the analysis is like this: During STOP, children put down the marshmallow when their friends told them not to eat or they did not eat by themselves or their friends help them not to eat. THINK step can be divided into ‘perceiving’ and ‘finding strategy’ behavior. ‘Perceiving’ includes exploring marshmallow, enduring the desire with friends, and expecting results or rewards. ‘Finding strategy’ can be split up two kinds of behavior. ‘Turning attention’ shows behaviors like simply turning attention to surrounding. ‘Imagining’ includes various imagination. During DO, some young children eventually ate marshmallow alittle bit, and others endured without eating or helped their friends not to eat. Based on this result, this study determines assessment levels and describes the characters of each level, and finally makes the rubric. In the end, teachers verified the content’s validity and second, specialists in this field verified the content’s validity in terms of the developed rubric.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼