http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최용호 ( Choi Yongho ) 전북대학교 인문학연구소 2017 건지인문학 Vol.0 No.20
This paper aims to resolve a problem with Frege’s sense/reference distinction: a sentence employing empty name has thought as a sense. First, I will outline Frege’s theory of reference and how he had tried to solve the problem, what was the solution of B. Rusell, and why did G. Evans point out what the distinction has no coherence, especially in a thesis: a sentence without truth value has thought as its sense. Then, I will illustrate my idea that each of views can be adjusted to maintain Frege’s sense/reference distinction. Russell was correct on what there is, but we do not need his radical theory because I believe that if we can say that empty name refers what does not exist in this world, or fictional, a sentence with the empty name is false; Evans was correct, but Frege can hold his distinction if we can say the sentence with the empty name is false.
ESG 정보를 고려한 투자자별 조절효과가 기업가치에 미치는 영향
최용호(Yongho Choi),김광기(Kwangki Kim) 대한경영학회 2023 大韓經營學會誌 Vol.36 No.4
본 연구는 우선 ESG 경영환경을 채택하는 것이 기업가치에 어떤 영향을 미치고 있는지를 관찰하고자 한다. ESG경영을 채택하는 것에는 초기 투자비용이 발생하는 만큼 이를 주저할 수 있을 것이며, 오히려 기업가치를 감소시키는 결과를 야기시킬 수도 있을 것이다. 따라서, 분석 대상기업들에게 있어서 ESG 경영환경을 채택했다는 것이 과연 그들의 기업가치를 증가시켰는지 여부는 중대한 관전 포인트가 될 것이다. 두 번째로는 통제된 독립변수(ESG 평가등급)의 결과가 과연 종속변수(기업가치)에 어떤 영향을 미치는 가에 있어서 투자자 집단은 어떤 영향력을 미치고 있는지 살펴보고자 한다. 소유구조 별로 본 투자자 집단은 개인투자자, 자산운용사를 중심으로 한 국내 기관투자자, 그리고, 외국인 투자자로 대별할 수 있을 것이다. 이들은 저마다의 투자의사결정 구조나 성향이 다른 부류라 할 수 있다. 이렇게 서로 다른 성향을 갖는 투자자가 ESG환경에 대해서 어떤 반응을 보이는지를 살펴보는 것은 ESG 경영을 실시함에 있어서 시행하는 많은 의사결정에 도움을 줄 수 있을 것이다. 본 연구에서는 투자자를 외국인, (국내) 기관투자자, 그리고, 국민연금으로 구분하였고, 투자자 집단은 아니지만 모든 경영 의사결정에 중대한 영향을 미치는 대주주가 ESG 경영에 있어서 어떠한 조절효과를 갖는지도 연구하고자 한다. ESG 정보가 이해관계자의 요구를 반영하는 것이기도 하지만 주주와 경영자 간 대리인 문제를 살펴보는 도구가 될 수 있기도 하다. ESG 지표가 기업가치에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는가에 대한 분석 결과는 유의적이고, 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있음을 발견할 수 있었다. 다만, 주요 항목에서는 상이한 결과가 나타났는데, 사회(S) 분야에서는 유의적으로 나타난 반면 환경, 지배구조 분야에서는 그 유의성을 찾을 수가 없었다. 투자자별로 구분해 분석한 연구에서는 외국인과 국민연금이 긍정적인 영향을 미치고 있었으나 기관투자자는 유의적으로 나타나지 않았다. 대주주 역시 긍정적인 효과를 나타내고 있어, ESG 경영환경 요소가 투자자나 대주주에게 중요하게 인식되고 있음을 관찰할 수 있었다. This study first aims to observe how the adoption of the ESG management environment affects firm value. Adopting ESG management may be hesitant as much as the initial investment costs are incurred, and it may rather result in a decrease in firm value. Therefore, it will be an important point of observation for the analyzed companies whether adopting the ESG management environment actually increased their firm value. Second, we will examine the influence of the investor group on how the results of the controlled independent variable (ESG rating) affect the dependent variable (firm value). By ownership structure, the group of investors can be roughly divided into individual investors, domestic institutional investors centered on asset management companies, and foreign investors. Each of these can be said to be a different type of investment decision-making structure or propensity. Looking at how investors with such different tendencies react to the ESG environment will help many decisions made in implementing ESG management. In this study, investors are classified into foreign investors, (domestic) institutional investors, and the National Pension Service, and we want to study what kind of moderating effect the major shareholders, who are not an investor group but have a significant impact on all management decisions, have in ESG management. While ESG information reflects the needs of stakeholders, it can also be a tool for examining the agency problem between shareholders and managers. As a result of the analysis on whether ESG indicators have a positive effect on firm value, it was found that they have a significant and positive effect. However, different results were found in the major items. Significant results were found in the social (S) field, but no significance was found in the environment and governance fields. In the study analyzed separately by investor, foreigners and the national pension had a positive effect, but institutional investors did not appear significantly. Large share-holders also showed a positive effect, and it was observed that ESG management environment factors were recognized as important by investors and major shareholders.
최용호 ( Yongho Choi ) 전북대학교 인문학연구소 2018 건지인문학 Vol.0 No.23
This paper aims to examine Kripke’s meaning scepticism, or sceptical paradox and sceptical solution about meaning in the late 20<sup>th</sup> century, and show an argument against his negative thesis about meaning. Frist, historical background of meaning scepticism will be introduced. Next, each of his negative views about meaning will be reorganized as an argument. Finally, my argument will be provided against the negative prospective of meaning. 1) There is another practical area of language that cannot be regarded as an area depending only on agreement of community. 2) It is true that the sceptic about meaning relies on his memory, which is criticized by himself. 3) Basic principles of logic can be a good candidate of low-level fact for meaning ascription. 4) How much degree of justification do we need to determine whether a candidate is a fact about meaning ascription? 5) Should we admit that the argument of the sceptic is sound? I have suggested my opinions for each of them, 1) ~ 5). And I believe that my argument implies a conclusion that we have a good starting point to go opposite way of the unpromising line about meaning.