http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
최봉구,이성호 釜山大學校 都市問題硏究所 2002 都市硏究報 Vol.13 No.-
The aims of this study are at large classified into twofold. First, though case laws and academic theories relating to the land expropriation, we investigate the fairness of the purpose of the land expropriation. Second, considering law reports and question-and-answer reports on the right of repurchase, we bring implicity of the institutional repurchase into the view of urban planning. In order to help people pursue a happy and comfortable life in the modern welfare-nation, it may be necessary to acquire some private land in a compulsory way prescribed in law for the construction of such public facilities as railways, roads, dams, power generation plants, housing sites and parks and so on. However, public land acquisition increase on the one land, various public projects are being delayed or given up, worsening the socio-economic conditions for them on other. Under these conditions, legislation relating to the land expropriation secure the rights of repurchase on land expropriated for the purpose of public projects. The repurchase right has developed into more details from case laws and academic theories. Though case laws and academic theories, it has been established that the repurchase right is a type of private right in which its transferability cannot be denied. Therefore, authorities and planners take part in land expropriation must afford deliberative efforts to prevent the purpose of expropriation from making a change. Because socio-economic conditions are so much fluid as time passed.