http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
전완부(前腕部) 경혈(經穴) 취혈(取穴)에서 골도분촌법(骨度分寸法)과 일부법(一夫法)의 비교(比較) 연구(硏究)
박히준 ( Hi Joon Park ),채윤병 ( Youn Byoung Chae ),차응석 ( Wung Seok Cha ),박종배 ( Jong Bae Park ),이혜정 ( Hye Jung Lee ),이향숙 ( Hyang Sook Lee ),인창식 ( Chang Sik Yin ),고형균 ( Hyung Kyun Koh ),김수영 ( Su Young Kim ) 대한경락경혈학회 2004 Korean Journal of Acupuncture Vol.21 No.4
Background: The cun measurement system, an essential and convenient method in locating acupoints, has been widely used in the practice of acupuncture. However, traditional cun measurement has been criticized for its lack of reliability. Objectives: The purposes of this study are to determine if one cun measured by the directional methods have a consistency with that of proportional methods and to investigate which factors are related with these differences, especially in forearm. Methods: The distance between the elbow crease and the wrist crease of forearm was compared to a reference value of one cun obtained by the directional method. In this method, one cun is one third of the distance between index finger and small finger of a subject, measured at proximal interphalangeal joint. In addition, to investigate the factors influencing the differences between these two methods, we measured the height and body weight and calculated body mass index (BMI). Finally we analyzed the factors correlated with these lengths by linear regression teat. Results: The results showed that one cun obtained by the directional methods were significantly different from one cun by the proportional methods in forearm. It was demonstrated that the length acquired with the directional method was more correlated with body weight and body mass index, while the length obtained by the proportional method was more correlated with the height. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the directional method is less likely dependable in locating acupoints than the proportional method because the influencing factors are different.