http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
스마트워치의 지속사용에 관한 연구 : 획득유형에 따른 차이 분석
유혜인(Hye In Yoo),이중정(Choong C. Lee),윤혜정(Haejung Yun) 한국IT서비스학회 2020 한국IT서비스학회지 Vol.19 No.2
In the growth of IT industry, interest in wearable device has been globally rising along with the evolution of technology. A Smartwatch is expected to be at the center of wearable device industry in the future. However, there are some concerns that most of its actual sales are caused by gifts or bundling. Motivated by these issues, this study propounds the ideas that to enter the mainstream market, the empirical research is required for actual consumers who continue to use a smartwatch. The purpose of this study is to identify key factors affecting user satisfaction and antecedents affecting continuance intention to use from consumer perspectives. Further, assuming consumers perceptions will be different according to how they acquired smartwatch, this study classified the group as direct buyers and acquired users. To achieve the purpose of the research, this study analyzes the usage of smartwatch by integrating the IS Success Model and IS Continuance and Habit Theory. We implemented the survey of 338 smartwatch users, and the research findings indicate that information quality and system quality have significant effects on satisfaction, and consequently satisfaction and habit positively affect the continuance intention to use. Additionally, it is found that there was a significant difference in the relationship between satisfaction and habit in the group divided by acquisition type. Based on these findings, this study provides theoretical and practical implications.
자율주행시스템 발전을 위한 법제적 고찰 ― 법제 개선방향을 중심으로 ―
유혜인 ( Yoo Hye In ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 의료·과학기술과 법센터 2021 연세 의료·과학기술과 법 Vol.12 No.1
This study was prepared based on the analysis of the Personal Information Protection Act and the Location Information Act, starting with a review of the problems of the current law that hinder the implementation of a complete five-step autonomous driving system. In particular, when collecting driver's driving information in the process of establishing a system of autonomous vehicle manufacturers that develop autonomous driving systems, discussions were conducted focusing on the limitations of the 'requirements for consent of information subjects' of the relevant law. According to the study, these are found to be the legal risks of the operators. First, it is unclear which of the “Personal Information Protection Act” or “Location Information Act” should be applied to autonomous vehicle manufacturers first, and whether the information collected by the manufacturer is “Personal Location Information” or “Location information of automobiles”. Also, the “pseudonym information” in Article 28-2(1) of the Personal Information Protection Act, which allows manufacturers to use more freely, does not provide standards or methods of processing, and it is not clear whether the development of autonomous driving systems falls under the “scientific research” of the same article. Finally, since it is not clear whether the manufacturer is a “location information provider” or a “location-based service provider” under the Location Information Act, the practice unnecessarily produces multiple terms and conditions and provides them to customers. Resolving the uncertainty of these laws and easing the requirements for consent from operators could reduce the manufacturer's development costs and speed up the realization of a complete autonomous driving system.