RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 고형연료의 염소 및 황 분석을 위한 시험방법별 비교

        왕희상(Heesang Wang),한소영(Soyoung Han) 한국환경에너지공학회 2022 한국열환경공학회 학술대회지 Vol.2022 No.1

        Domestic solid refuse fuels can be manufactured and distributed only when they pass appropriate standards under the current environment certification system. The content of total chlorine and sulfur, one of these standards, not only has a significant impact on the durability and efficiency of the facility, but also might be environmentally problematic. Currently, the proper chlorine content of solid fuels distributed in Korea is regulated to be less than 2.0 wt.% and the sulfur content is less than 0.6 wt.% and only 2.0 wt.% less in the case of tire chip fuel. It is being tested by the domestic certified test method for solid refuse fuel. There are also ASTM D 7359 in the United States and JIS Z 7302 in Japan for analyzing chlorine and sulfur content. In this study, the domestic certified test method for analyzing chlorine and sulfur content, as well as methods guided by ASTM D 7359 and JIS Z 7302 method are reviewed, and the chlorine and sulfur content of solid fuels is compared. Furthermore, in the future, we would like to find an optimized method for the analysis of chlorine and sulfur content by type of solid fuel.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼