http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
朴在公 關東大學校 地域開發硏究所 1997 社會科學論叢 Vol.1 No.1
The NIMBY phenomena rejecting the siting hazardous and noxious facilities, which give benefits to society as a whole, are caused by the closed and unfair siting process and procedures, the lack of knowledge and information about facilities, and the negatve behaviors and attitudes against siting facilities. But the most important reason for NIMBY is the unbalance between the benefits and costs resulted from the siting hazardous and noxious facilities. The three approaches to overcoming NIMBY phenomena can be presented as facilitation, persuasion and bargaining in accordance with the social psychological occuring process of NIMBY. On the basis of the results from reviewing these approaches through the articles concerned and case analysis, I could present a new co-solution model as the effective coping with NIMBY phenomena, which regards the residents of proposed host communities as co-solvers, not as participants.
保護的規制政策의 執行에 있어서 執行機關과 對象集團의 關係
朴在公 관동대학교 1996 關大論文集 Vol.24 No.2
This research focuses on the corelations between implementing agencies and policy target groups and on the target group involvement in the implementation process of protective regulation policy. The questions - how the corelations and the involvements are - were solved through the ananlysis of implementation process of Korean environmental protective policy. The important findings through the analysis were the deregulation as a target group involvement in the underegulated Korean society and the strong influence of government economic agencies on implementing agency in the implementation process. The regulated groups used the strong power and influence of government economic agencies as the means of involvement in the implementation process of environmental protective policy in Korea. And this involvement was so effective that lots of demands for deregulation were accepted by implementers. Other reason for the easy acceptance of deregulation demands was the unreasonably high strength of regulation which would have brought about administrative inefficiency in policy implementation. So, we have to put the importance on the point that the strength of regulation in protective regulation policy in Korea has to be so reasonable that target group compliance can be easily elicitated.