http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김학수 ( Kim Hag Su ) 한국고문서학회 2003 古文書硏究 Vol.23 No.-
It is true that the understanding of the administrative process is often made based not on the posthumous title but on a class of codes although the posthumous title plays the key role in Choson society. Raising a question on this attitude, this study is to analyse the administrative process based on the posthumous title of Choson Dynasty and to find its meaning. Based on the posthumous title of Choson Dynasty, the administrative process is found to have the complicated process and the administrative management is found to be fair. - The process and the mode formed by the codes apply in the administration based on the posthumous title of Choson Dynasty, which reveals the administration system is well organized. However, concerning geom-Sang(檢詳) and sa-in(舍人) of State Council there exist no documents. - An official document on the administration based on the posthumous title makes it possible to increase the efficiency of administrative work and to grasp the administrative process. An official document on the administration based on the posthumous title as well as Ip-an(立案) and Haeyu-munseo(解由文書) is found to be useful to understand the administrative process and how to deal with the documents of Choson Dynasty. - Although the administrative system based on the posthumous title is well organized, there exists an exceptional case. Namely, some documents such as sihomang-danja(諡號望單子), seokyeong- wmeui(署經完議) and siho-kyoji( 諡號敎旨) are found to be disqualified for an official document making a difference in documents` name, the way of marking and the place of an official seal . - An official document on the administration based on the posthumous title is useful to catch the order of the administrative process. It is useful to explain the interval between the date on which king`s permission granted and the date in the True Record of Choson Dynasty. Besides, it is helpful to show siho-kyoji(諡號敎旨) and siho-seokyeong(諡號署經) in chronological order. - Seonsi(宣諡) and Yeonsi(延諡) are found to be a burden for the descendants in the course of holding a feast in celebration of confemng the posthumous title, while they make Jeungsi(?諡) authoritative by emphasizing their ceremonial function . - It proved to be absurd that the descendants are qualified and they are restricted from using the posthumous title based on Yeonsi(延諡) being against the original intent of the system .