미결구금시설로서의 경찰서 유치장제도

김태명(Kim Tea-Myeong) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2004 형사정책연구 Vol.59 No.-

랫드의 간에서 다양한 농도의 아플라톡신 투여에 의한 DNA Adduct의 형성과 Ras의 발현양상

김태명(Tae Myoung Kim),허진주(Jin Joo Hue),리란(Lan Li),김대중(Dae Joong Kim),남상윤(Sang Yoon Nam),윤영원(Young Won Yun),이범준(Beom Jun Lee) 한국독성학회 2005 Toxicological Research Vol.21 No.4

Aflatoxins are produced by Aspergillus flavus, parasiticus that grows in improperly stored cereals. Aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) is a potent hepatocarcinogen in a variety of experimental animals including human beings. In spite of a high attention to the hepatocarcinogenecity of aflatoxins, the relative toxicity of other types (AFB₂, AFG₁ and AFG₂) of the toxins is not fully clarified. Sprague-Dawley male rats were orally administered with AFB₁, AFB₂, AFG₁ and AFG₂ at the dose of 250, 1250, and 2500 μg/kg body weight. Animals were then killed at 12, 24 or 48 hrs following aflatoxin adminstration. Subsequently the relative weight of liver was measured and histopathological examination on the liver was performed. Level of 8-OxodG and expression of ras gene in the liver was determined. The relative liver weights at high doses of AFB₁ and AFG₁ was significantly low. The treatment of AFB₁ at the high dose of 2500 ㎍/㎏ showed vacuolar degeneration and centrilobular hepatic necrosis with inflammatory cells. The pathological changes by AFB₂, AFG₁ and AFG₂ were not clearly found. The formation of 8-OxodG by AFB₁ increased in a dose-dependent manner up to 24 hrs after a single treatment of AFB₁ thereafter decreased to the level of the control. The treatments of AFB₂, AFG₁ and AFG₂ showed an inconsistent pattern in the formation of 8-OxodG in the liver of rats with increasing time. The expression of ras oncogene in the liver by AFB₁ at the dose of 1250 ㎍/㎏ was increased twice compared to the control. The treatments of AFB₂, AFG₁ and AFG₂ at all doses decreased the expression of ras in the liver. These results in the present study indicate that AFB₁ among aflatoxins with low comparable levels is the most toxic as determined by early biomarkers such as 8-OxodG formation and ras expression. However, the levels of 8-OxodG and ras as biomarkers were not useful to predict the relative hepatocarcinogenicity of aflatoxins to AFB₁ in the present model. Further studies are required to look for other biomarkers to predict carcinogenic potency of aflatoxins.

경찰관의 무기사용에 대한 정당방위의 성립여부

김태명(Tea-Myeong Kim) 한국형사판례연구회 2007 刑事判例硏究 Vol.15 No.-

법치주의 확립을 위한 법교육 프로그램(Ⅰ) : 출소자의 사회복지 지원을 위한 법교육 프로그램 개발 연구

김태명(Kim Tae-myeong),백승흠(Baek Seung-heum),조진우(Cho Jin-woo) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2009 형사정책연구원 연구총서 Vol.- No.-

재심절차에서의 불이익변경 여부의 판단 - 대법원 2016. 3. 24. 선고 2016도1131 판결 -

김태명 ( Kim Taemyeong ) 법조협회 2017 法曹 Vol.66 No.2

본 평석의 대상이 된 판결에서는 피고인이 제1심에서 집행유예를 선고받은 후 다시 죄를 범하여 실형을 선고받아 집행유예의 실효가 예정되어 있는 경우 항소심에서 징역형을 가볍게 하면서 집행유예를 없애는 것이 불이익변경금지 원칙에 반하는지 여부가 문제되었다. 원심은 피고인이 제1심에서 징역 1년 6월, 집행유예 3년을 선고 받은 후 다시 상해죄 등을 저질러 징역 2년의 실형을 선고받아 그 판결이 확정됨으로써 사실상 집행유예가 실효될 것이 예정되어 있었던 점, 이 사건재심은 처벌의 근거가 된「폭력행위 등 처벌에 관한 법률」(이하 `폭력행위처벌법`이라 한다) 제3조 제1항에 대한 헌법재판소의 위헌결정에 의해 이루어졌기 때문에 재심법원으로서는 피고인에게 무죄나 면소판결을 선고할 수 없고 판결 선고당시의 형법 규정을 적용하여 피고인을 처벌해야 한다는 점 등을 근거로, 징역 1년 6월, 집행유예 3년을 징역 1년의 실형으로 변경하는 것은 불이익변경에 반하지 않는다고 보았다. 이에 대해 대법원은 징역형의 집행유예를 선고한 데 그 징역형의 형기를 단축하여 실형을 선고하는 것은 불이익변경에 해당한다는 기존의 법리를 이 사건에도 적용하여, 재심대상판결에서 징역형의 집행유예를 선고하였음에도 재심법원이 형기를 줄이는 대신 집행유예를 없애는 것은 불이익변경금지원칙에 위배된다고 판시하였다. 항소심에서 선고된 형이 불이익한지 여부는 개별적·형식적으로 고찰할 것이 아니라 전체적·실질적으로 고찰하여야 한다. 집행유예를 선고받는 경우에는 형집행이 면제되고, 실효 또는 취소됨이 없이 그 기간을 경과한 때에는 형선고의 효력이 상실된다는 점에서 실형을 선고받는 것과는 큰 차이가 있다는 점을 고려해 볼때, 재심대상판결은 집행유예를 선고한 데 대하여 재심법원에서는 형기를 단축하여 실형을 선고하는 것은 원칙적으로 불이익변경에 해당한다. 그러나 이 사건에서와 같이 사실상 (재심)법원에서 피고인이 무죄 또는 면소판결을 받을 가능성이 없고 재심대상판결에서 선고받은 집행유예의 실효가 예정되어 있다면, 재심법원이 형기를 단축하면서 실형을 선고하는 것이 반드시 피고인에게 불리하다고 볼 수는 없다고 할 것이다. Korean criminal procedure law adopted the principle of prohibition of reformatio in peius, which prohibit sentences heavier than the sentence for original judgement in cases appealed by the defender or for the defender. This principle is also adopted in the criminal retrial procedure which is designed to provide a remedy to the innocent and has been contributing to the due process and the right to impartial trial provided in the Korean Constitution. The Korean courts have been taking so-called the synthetic and practical judgement as standard for judgement whether the sentence in appellate or retrial process violates the principle. However this standard has encountered criticism that it is hard to prevent the involvement of the judge`s personal opinions and to guarantee objectivity in its judgement. According to this rule, it is not clear whether the suspended sentence with longer period of imprisonment is heavier than the sentence with shorter period of imprisonment. It has been generally recognized that the prison sentence is heavier than the sentence with a stay of execution, because the latter don`t accompany the imprisonment for the given period of time and the sentence loses its validity when the given period of time elapsed as long as the suspended sentence is not cancelled by the court or become invalid because of the other conviction. The Korean courts rules that the imprisonment sentence is heavier than the suspended sentence as long as the other conditions are equal. And it also ruled that the prison sentence with shorter period of imprisonment is heavier than the suspended sentence with longer period of imprisonment in a retrial procedure, even though the suspension is practically expected to be cancelled because of the other conviction due to another crime that was committed after the suspended sentence. Considering the this circumstance, it is much more logical that the Court rules the suspended sentence with longer period of imprisonment in the retrial process than the imprisonment period in the lower court don`t violate the principle of prohibition of reformatio.

검찰시민위원회 및 기소심사회 제도에 대한 비판적 고찰

김태명(Kim Tae-Myeong) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2010 형사정책연구 Vol.84 No.-

개정 형사소송법과 국민참여재판제도의 시행에 따른 경찰수사의 변화방향

김태명(Kim Tae-Myeong) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2007 형사정책연구 Vol.71 No.-

다시 개정되어야 할 재정신청제도

김태명(Kim Tae-Myeong) 한국형사법무정책연구원 2010 형사정책연구 Vol.82 No.-

권력형 성범죄의 처벌과 비동의 간음·추행죄의 도입

김태명(Kim, Tae-Myeong) 전북대학교 법학연구소 2018 法學硏究 Vol.57 No.-

안희정 사건은 미투운동이 본격적으로 전개되면서 그 실체를 드러낸 권력형 성범죄의 대표적인 사례로 일컬어지는 안희정 사건은 그동안 폭행 · 협박에 의한 성폭력범죄에 밀려 관심의 대상이 되지 못했던 권력형 성범죄의 특징과 피해자가 겪는 어려움이 널리 알려지게 되었다. 그리고 최근 안희정 사건에 대해 내려진 제1심 판결은 업무상 위계 · 위력에 의한 간음 · 추행죄의 성립요건과 적용범위 그리고 다른 외국에서는 성폭력범죄의 기본유형으로 규정된 이른바 비동의 간음 · 추행죄의 도입 필요성을 깨닫게 하는 계기가 되었다. 다른 외국의 입법례와 비교해 볼 때 우리나라에는 한편으로 업무상 위계 · 위력에 의한 간음 · 추행죄라는 독특한 유형의 범죄가 있고 다른 한편으로는 다른 외국에는 일반적으로 규정되어 있는 비동의 간음 · 추행죄가 없다. 업무상 위계 · 위력에 의한 간음· 추행죄는 이른바 권력형 성범죄에 적용될 것을 염두에 둔 대표적인 범죄유형으로서, 자신의 사회적 지위를 이용하여 상대방의 저항의지를 꺾고 상대방의 성적 자기결정의 자유를 침해하는 행위는 마땅히 이 유형의 범죄로 다스려야 한다. 그리고 최근 언론이나 정치권에서 도입이 주장되고 있는 비동의 간음 추행죄는 권력형 성범죄에 적용되는 것이 아니라 사회적 힘의 다과(多寡)에 의한 권력관계를 전제로 하지 않은 일상생활에서 발생하는 성범죄에 적용된다. 세계적 입법추세 그리고 날이 갈수록 성적 자기결정의 자유의 중요성과 보호필요성에 대한 인식이 높아지고 있는 우리나라의 현실을 감안해 볼 때 비동의간음 · 추행죄의 도입이 필요하다고 본다. 다만 이러한 법개정에 앞서 위계 · 위력을 수단으로 하는 간음 · 추행죄의 충실한 적용이 선행되어야 한다고 본다. The former governor of Chungnam Province and one-time presidential contender, Ahn Hee-jung has been acquitted of sexual abuse in one of the highest profile cases emerged from #MeToo movement in South Korea. His secretary Kim Ji-eun, who was encouraged by MeToo movement and made the allegations at an interview with news channel, had accused him of sexual intercourse and sexual contact by abuse of authority. The court ruled that he was not guilty of all counts saying it saw little evidence that he used his authority to force Kim into sex, adding the evidence was not enough to prove that victim’s sexual freedom was infringed against her will. And it ruled there are also many things that were questionable and incomprehensible in the victim’s testimony Dozens of women’s rights groups criticised that the court failed to recognize the reality, in which the victim had to choose between resisting boss’s order or losing her job and livelihood. Many legal experts say that it is difficult to understand its ruling, even though Ahn said to Kim Im ashamed. I have disappointed you all, The South Korean government announced plans to intensify punishment power-related sexual violence and introduce the punishment regulation of the sexual act without consent. This paper review the various types of the sexual assaults in Koreas criminal law. And check if it is appropriate and necessary to introduce the clause providing the punishment of sexual act without consent.

[논문] 간접정범 규정의 해석과 허위공문서작성죄의 간접정범

김태명(Kim Tae-Myeong) 한국형사법학회 2004 형사법연구 Vol.22 No.-

The indirect principal is one who commits a crime by way of taking advantage of a person who himself is not punished. The article 34 paragraph 1 provides that a person who commits a crime by instigating or aiding and abetting another who is not punishable for such conduct, or who is punishable as an offender through negligence, shall be punishable in accordance with the provision for an instigator or accessory. The majority opinion understands that this provision defines that the indirect offender is not a kind of complicity but of principal, and insists that the indirect principal of a status crime, of which a person's status is an element, such as the preparation of false public document can't be constituted, because a person who lacks the status can't commit that crime. On the contrary the Supreme Court ruled that the person who made an untrue statement to a public official, thereby caused a false entry to be made in a public document shall be punished as an indirect principal of the preparation of false public document. For an adequate interpretation of the indirect principal clause, we should examine its provision not from its nature as a type of the principal, but from the legal or interpretational point of view. It can be confirmed the lawmakers of the Criminal Code in 1953 provided it as a fictitious complicity which shall be punished with provisions of complicity, and intended to prevent the extension of the scope of its punishment. The discussion in this paper can be summarized as follows. First, the indirect principal shall be constituted and punished in accordance with the provision for complicity. So the commencement of its commission is recognized not at the time when the indirect principal takes advantage of a person, but at the time when the person who is instigated or aided and abetted reaches the commencement stage of its commission. And the indirect principal shall not be punished, unless the person doesn't carry out a crime. Second, the indirect principal of a status crime such as preparation of false document(article 227) shall be constituted and punished. Because to a person who collaborates in the commission of a crime, of which a person's status is an ingredient, the provision of the Instigator and Accessories shall apply even though that person lacks such status(article 33), and the indirect principal shall be punishable in accordance with the provision for complicity(article 34 paragraph 1), a person who makes a false report to a public official and has that official enter record any false fact in a public document shall be punished as the indirect principal of the preparation of a false public document.