http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
중국과 한국의 위기대응 비교분석 -사스와 메르스를 중심으로-
풍배배 ( Feng Bei Bei ),김재관 ( Kim Jaegwan ) 한국자치행정학회 2020 한국자치행정학보 Vol.34 No.2
The crisis management field in modern countries is expanding not only in the traditional military field but also in the non-military field. Therefore, the system of responding to national crises is very important. Developed countries have sufficient crisis management mechanisms to deal with these crisis situations, but China's crisis management mechanism is still insufficient. This study shows how to improve China's crisis management system compared to South Korea's relatively advanced crisis management system. In China, SARS is considered to be one of the most representative cases of the infectious disease crisis, and the MERs situation in Korea focuses on the infectious disease crisis response process. We compare and analyze the crisis response systems and systems of the two countries. Infectious diseases, including viral diseases such as SARS and MERs, are not considered to be just infectious diseases due to their rapid transmission rate and fatal characteristics, which is the greatest threat to national public health in the 21st century. The comparative analysis and evaluation project of infectious disease crisis countermeasures is carried out on the basis of theoretical review and previous research. First, professional institutions and legal basis, second, inter-agency cooperation support system, third, command reporting system, and fourth, dispatching system. The respondent was selected. The research results show that China needs to review the general aspects of the crisis response system, including policies and regulations related to the fight against infectious diseases, the division of functions of professional crisis response agencies, and the cooperation between the government and local governments. It is necessary to establish a more effective response to the crisis. Complete crisis response system.