http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
강묘정 ( Myo Jeong Kang ),공영태 ( Young Tae Kong ) 경북대학교 과학교육연구소 2014 科學敎育硏究誌 Vol.38 No.2
The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of argumentation for elementary students` scientific writing. Using nine subjects that were comprised of scientific situations and social scientific situations, this study was applied to four 5th grade students utilizing argumentation and scientific writing. The students` scientific writing and argumentation were collected and analyzed based on three domains of scientific writing: scientific thinking, logic, and creativity. The results from this study are as follows. First, the various contents of argumentation positively affected all of the scientific writing domains in post-argumentation scientific writing. Second, the contents of argumentation appeared in the post-argumentation scientific writing as three different forms: 1) Each individual`s scientific concepts, claims, and ideas, which were newly mentioned in the process of argumentation, were expressed, 2) Their classmates` claims, grounds and ideas, which were discussed in the process of argumentation, were expressed through internalization, and 3) Expanded ideas, new claims and inferences based on the argumentation were expressed.
연구논문 : 논의활동 전,후의 글쓰기에 나타난 과학글쓰기 능력의 정량적 변화 분석
공영태 ( Young Tae Kong ),강묘정 ( Myo Jeong Kang ) 경북대학교 과학교육연구소 2013 科學敎育硏究誌 Vol.37 No.3
이 연구의 목적은 논의활동 전·후에 작성한 초등학생들의 과학글쓰기에서 나타나는 과학글쓰기 능력의 변화 모습과 논의활동이 과학글쓰기 능력에 미친 영향을 알아보는데 두었다. 이를 위하여 과학적 상황과 사회과학적 상황으로 구성된 9가지 논의 및 과학글쓰기 주제를 개발하고 이를 초등학교 5학년 학생 8명을 대상으로 적용하였다. 논의활동 전·후에 작성한 과학글쓰기의 서술 내용을 과학글쓰기 4가지 목표영역 분석틀에 따라 비교하여 과학글쓰기 능력의 변화를 정량 및 정성적으로 분석하였다. 이번 연구에서 얻어진 결론은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 논의활동 후 과학글쓰기는 논의 전 과학글쓰기에 비하여 과학글쓰기 능력인 4가지 목표영역(과학성, 논리성, 창의성, 표현력)에서 모두 긍정적인 변화가 관찰되었다. 둘째, 과학적 상황 및 사회과학적 상황의 주제에서 모두 긍정적인 변화가 관찰되었다. 특히 논의 및 글쓰기 주제가 친숙할 경우 과학글쓰기 목표영역의 변화가 많았다. 셋째, 학생들의 수준에 따라 변화하는 정도는 다르지만 모든 참여 학생들의 과학글쓰기 능력의 향상되었다. 성취도 수준이 높은 학생일수록 과학글쓰기 능력의 향상이 높았지만 성취도 수준이 낮은 학생에서도 긍정적인 변화가 관찰되었다. The aim of this study is to investigate the change of science writing ability between pre and post-science writing which was written before and after argumentation activity and to show how argumentation influences the science writing ability. To fulfill this aim, eight 5th grade students were chosen from an elementary school. They were involved in the nine science writing themes which was compose of scientific contexts and social scientific contexts. Students` science works in argumentation and writing activity were collected and analysed based on four domains of framework for science writing ability: scientific thinking, logic, creativity and expression ability. The result of this study showed that the affirmative change of four domains of science writing ability on post-science writing written after argumentation was observed. Also, an affirmative change was observed in all of the scientific and social scientific themes. A lot of changes of the scientific writing ability were observed especially when the themes were familar to student. The degree of change depended on the level of the student, but overall it influenced all participating students with a positive improvement for their scientific writing ability. Students with high grade of academic achievement showed high improvement in science writing ability, but students who had low grade of academic achievement also showed a positive improvement in science writing ability.