RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 論賈公彦《周禮注疏》對六朝舊說的沿襲與超越

        顧遷(Gu Qian) 경북대학교 인문학술원 2009 동서사상 Vol.7 No.-

        The imperial edited “Wujing Zhengyi” in Tang Zhen Guan years, was mostly based on the commentaries in Southern and Northern Dynasties and went a step further to make beforehand explanations. The “Zhou Li Zhu Shu” which was written by Jia Gongyan in Yong Hui years was also based on “Zhouguan Li Yi Shu” which was written by Shenzhong. This was the general character in the commentaries in the beginning of Tang dynasty. “Zhou Li Zhu Shu” was written by Jia himself, so it was more perfect compared to “Wujing Zhengyi” which was written by many person and the trace it revised the former “Shu” is not obvious. This article will carefully study to make the region it followed clear. “Wujing Zhengyi” extended the patterns of the former commentaries and displayed different meanings. So its function is very big, but its feature is limited. However, "Shu" briefly focused on the emphases, left the limitations from the former commentaries, so it surpassed the pattern of the commentaries in the Southern and Northern Dynasties. From hermeneutics, Jia “Shu” paid more attention to the value of the expositor’s own thinking, it is a departure from the method of the imperial edited “Zhengyi”. Maybe the effort of Jia is not conscious, but it objectively played a role in the transition between Tang and Song Confucian, and it reflects the subtle changes of the style of study after Early Tang Dynasty. Perhaps that was why it owned ZhuXi’s respect in Jiujing Zhengyi.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼