http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : WOO-SAM, ANNE MARIE (검색결과 3 건)
-
-
-
WOO-SAM, ANNE MARIE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, BERKELEY 1999 해외박사(DDOD)
This dissertation examines the implementation of a “domestic immigration policy” by California's Commission of Immigration and Housing. The history of U.S. immigration policy is usually written as a fight over restrictions and quotas at the federal level. Describing immigration policy in this way, scholars have ignored the existence of state immigrant protective agencies that emerged during the Progressive Era. By 1923, such policies existed in states having over fifty percent of the United States' immigrant population. California's program was the second in the nation and one of the most ambitious in the scope of its activities. The first chapter places California's program in the context of a national movement for a “domestic immigration policy.” In California, New York, Massachusetts and other states, this policy aimed to assimilate immigrants through three broad areas of action: protection, education, and geographical dispersion. In practice, these areas of reform translated into state programs for the Americanization of immigrants and the native-born, the state's regulation of living and working conditions, and the state's adjustment of immigrant complaints. The second chapter introduces the bureaucrats responsible for the commission's development. Chapters three through six examine California's domestic immigration policy in four areas: Americanization, the adjustment of immigrant complaints, the regulation of migrant laborers' living and working conditions, and the regulation of housing. A concluding chapter looks at the movement away from the domestic immigration policy that the commission started with and the development of new policies as part of the “fight against fascism” in California from 1939 through 1942. This dissertation thus challenges the literature which looks at immigration policy only at the federal level, or which discusses domestic immigration policy merely within a social control framework. When we look at the commission's functions, it becomes evident that the social control of immigrant life was only part of a much more comprehensive domestic immigration policy. Rather than emphasizing Americanization as a one way exchange in which immigrants were expected to adopt American values, California's experience shows that Americanization called for fundamental changes in native-born behavior and institutions to a degree that has rarely been acknowledged in the literature.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
