RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • Counseling center survival: What directors need to know from Vice-Presidents of Student Affairs

        Bettin, Katherine Volpe Georgia State University 2005 해외박사(DDOD)

        RANK : 247343

        Counseling centers in the Accountability Era need to communicate and collaborate within the hierarchy of the university to ensure that they (a) justify funding requests within the university budget; (b) assist the university significantly in meeting its goals; and (c) demonstrate their services as more valuable and effective than other similar services on or off campus. The purpose of this research was to provide a qualitative, exploratory investigation of the perceptions of counseling centers by Vice-Presidents of Student Affairs in order to determine how counseling centers should accomplish these goals. The sample consisted of six Vice-Presidents of Student Affairs from public, research universities. Each of these universities were designated by the State Board of Regents as either peer institutions (n = 4) or aspirational institutions (n = 1) to a large, urban research university in the southeastern United States (n = 1). Prospective participants were contacted through "snowball" or network sampling (LeCompte & Schensul, 1999). Each Vice-President participated in a recorded, semi-structured telephone interview that consisted of open-ended questions. Topics included questions of accountability, value, prioritization, challenges, and views of the future. Analysis of the data was based on the grounded theory approach (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). Perceptions of Vice-Presidents were coded into nine categories: (a) general impressions of counseling centers; (b) support for the mission of the university; (c) challenges; (d) internal accountability; (e) visibility; (f) story-telling; (g) unique contributions; (h) future; and (i) communication, power, and politics. Results indicated that although the participants agreed on most general issues, there were many differences among participants in the particulars of their underlying strategy, focus, and beliefs. "Ten Recommendations for Counseling Center Directors" was created from the mixture of their voices.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼