RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    관계노력이 신뢰와 몰입 및 성과에 미치는 영향

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9989857

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구 : 경북대학교, 2005

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문 (석사) -- 경북대학교 대학원 , 경영학과 , 2005

    • 발행연도

      2005

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 기타서명

      Effects of relationship efforts for trust, commitment, and performance

    • 형태사항

      vi, 82 p. : 챠트 ; 27 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      PDF 파일형태로도 이용가능
      참고문헌: p. 68-73

    • 소장기관
      • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As several retail markets have reached maturity, are over-stored, and have difficulties differentiating themselves based on merchandise selection only, retailer and more than ever obliged to continually seek out products, processes, and technologies that increase customer value.
    However, retailers generally have little Knowledge on the types of value drivers. Especially research pertaining to relationship marketing in consumer markets has advanced little. In general, marketing literature
    focused at product and service efforts as drivers of total consumer value to the neglect of relationship efforts.
    Nevertheless, some researchers recognize the importance of relationship-specific value components. This study defines and operationalizes four types of relationship efforts and empirically validates their impact on consumer' trust, relationship commitment, and behavioral loyalty, intention to keep relationship, word of mouth intention.
    The objectives of this study are as follows:
    First, it is objective to assist the researches for the relationship marketing in the domestic consumer markets. Second, it is objective to emphasize the importance of relationship efforts of department store as a large-scale retailer and to suggest four types of relationship efforts - direct mail, preferential treatment, tangible rewards, and cooperative intention. Third, it is objective to investigate the potential role of a retailer's relationship efforts in influencing consumer attitudes and behavior and demonstrate the effects of relationship efforts on trust in a retail setting.
    To accomplish the objectives of this study, theoretical and practical researches are carried out. In theoretical research, relationship marketing, detail types of relationship efforts, trust, relationship commitment, and factors affected the expectation performance are studies and developed. By using a result of this theoretical research, hypothesized model composed of five hypothesis is developed.
    As a data analysis method, frequency analysis to suggest the characteristics of popular statistics and data, factor analysis to evaluated the validity and credibility of measurement value of four types of relationship efforts, trust, relationship commitment, and result variables(word of mouth intention, intention to keep relationship, and behavioral loyalty), reliability analysis, and regression analysis are performed. As a result of above statical analysis, five hypotheses of the model are adopted.
    The results of study are as follows:
    First, while this study did not incorporate product or service efforts, it indicates that relationship efforts are important driver of customer value. Second, this study suggests that customer loyalty strategies can be built based on these relationship efforts. Consequently, managers and employees of retail companies should be well trained, motivated, and rewarded for making relationship efforts to regular customers. Third, several researchers warn that tangible rewards generally do not lead to sustainable competitive advantages. They refer to the reality that price is the most easily imitated element of the marketing mix, that some customers may react opportunistically, and that already-loyal customers can be 'unnecessarily' rewarded. Nevertheless, the author and some previous researchers including O'Brien and Jones advocate that rewarding strategies can lead to sustainable competitive advantages if such strategies are no short-term promotional give-aways, but planned and implemented parts of a larger loyalty management strategy. This study provides strong empirical supports for the potential competitive advantages resulting from the practice of rewarding consumers for their patronage.
    번역하기

    As several retail markets have reached maturity, are over-stored, and have difficulties differentiating themselves based on merchandise selection only, retailer and more than ever obliged to continually seek out products, processes, and technologies t...

    As several retail markets have reached maturity, are over-stored, and have difficulties differentiating themselves based on merchandise selection only, retailer and more than ever obliged to continually seek out products, processes, and technologies that increase customer value.
    However, retailers generally have little Knowledge on the types of value drivers. Especially research pertaining to relationship marketing in consumer markets has advanced little. In general, marketing literature
    focused at product and service efforts as drivers of total consumer value to the neglect of relationship efforts.
    Nevertheless, some researchers recognize the importance of relationship-specific value components. This study defines and operationalizes four types of relationship efforts and empirically validates their impact on consumer' trust, relationship commitment, and behavioral loyalty, intention to keep relationship, word of mouth intention.
    The objectives of this study are as follows:
    First, it is objective to assist the researches for the relationship marketing in the domestic consumer markets. Second, it is objective to emphasize the importance of relationship efforts of department store as a large-scale retailer and to suggest four types of relationship efforts - direct mail, preferential treatment, tangible rewards, and cooperative intention. Third, it is objective to investigate the potential role of a retailer's relationship efforts in influencing consumer attitudes and behavior and demonstrate the effects of relationship efforts on trust in a retail setting.
    To accomplish the objectives of this study, theoretical and practical researches are carried out. In theoretical research, relationship marketing, detail types of relationship efforts, trust, relationship commitment, and factors affected the expectation performance are studies and developed. By using a result of this theoretical research, hypothesized model composed of five hypothesis is developed.
    As a data analysis method, frequency analysis to suggest the characteristics of popular statistics and data, factor analysis to evaluated the validity and credibility of measurement value of four types of relationship efforts, trust, relationship commitment, and result variables(word of mouth intention, intention to keep relationship, and behavioral loyalty), reliability analysis, and regression analysis are performed. As a result of above statical analysis, five hypotheses of the model are adopted.
    The results of study are as follows:
    First, while this study did not incorporate product or service efforts, it indicates that relationship efforts are important driver of customer value. Second, this study suggests that customer loyalty strategies can be built based on these relationship efforts. Consequently, managers and employees of retail companies should be well trained, motivated, and rewarded for making relationship efforts to regular customers. Third, several researchers warn that tangible rewards generally do not lead to sustainable competitive advantages. They refer to the reality that price is the most easily imitated element of the marketing mix, that some customers may react opportunistically, and that already-loyal customers can be 'unnecessarily' rewarded. Nevertheless, the author and some previous researchers including O'Brien and Jones advocate that rewarding strategies can lead to sustainable competitive advantages if such strategies are no short-term promotional give-aways, but planned and implemented parts of a larger loyalty management strategy. This study provides strong empirical supports for the potential competitive advantages resulting from the practice of rewarding consumers for their patronage.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제제기 및 연구목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구방법 = 3
    • 3. 연구구성 = 4
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 문제제기 및 연구목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구방법 = 3
    • 3. 연구구성 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 1. 관계마케팅에 대한 이론적 고찰 = 6
    • 1) 관계마케팅의 개념 = 6
    • 2) 관계마케팅의 특징 = 10
    • 3) 관계마케팅의 효과 = 12
    • 4) 소매업체에 따른 관계마케팅 연구의 필요성 = 13
    • 2. 관계노력 = 14
    • 1) 관계노력의 개념 = 14
    • 2) 관계노력의 필요성 = 17
    • 3. 관계노력의 네 가지 유형 = 19
    • 1) 직접우편 = 19
    • 2) 차별적 대우 = 19
    • 3) 유형적 보상 = 21
    • 4) 협력의도 = 22
    • 4. 신뢰 = 23
    • 1) 신뢰의 개념 및 역할 = 23
    • 2) 신뢰의 형성과정 = 25
    • 5. 관계몰입 = 26
    • 1) 관계몰입의 개념 및 역할 = 26
    • 2) 관계몰입의 중요성 = 28
    • 6. 관계노력의 기대성과 = 29
    • 1) 구전 의도 = 30
    • 2) 관계지속 의도 = 31
    • 3) 행동적 충성도 = 33
    • Ⅲ. 실증연구의 설계 = 35
    • 1. 연구모형 = 35
    • 2. 연구가설 설정 = 36
    • 1) 관계노력의 세부유형과 신뢰에 관한 가설 = 36
    • 2) 신뢰와 관계몰입에 관한 가설 = 37
    • 3) 관계몰입과 구전의도에 관한 가설 = 38
    • 4) 관계몰입과 관계지속의도에 관한 가설 = 40
    • 5) 관계몰입과 행동충성도에 관한 가설 = 40
    • 3. 측정변수의 조작적 정의 = 42
    • 1) 신뢰에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 42
    • 2) 신뢰 = 44
    • 3) 관계몰입 = 44
    • 4) 구전 의도 = 45
    • 5) 관계지속 의도 = 45
    • 6) 행동적 충성도 = 46
    • 4. 조사방법 = 46
    • 1) 예비조사 및 본 조사 = 46
    • 2) 표본설계 및 자료수집 = 47
    • 3) 설문지 구성 = 47
    • 4) 자료분석 방법 = 49
    • Ⅳ. 분석결과 = 50
    • 1. 표본의 특성 = 50
    • 2. 측정항목의 타당성과 신뢰성 검증 = 52
    • 1) 타당성 검증 = 52
    • 2) 신뢰성 검증 = 56
    • 3. 연구가설의 검증 = 58
    • 1) 가설 1의 검증 = 58
    • 2) 가설 2의 검증 = 59
    • 3) 가설 3의 검증 = 60
    • 4) 가설 4의 검증 = 61
    • 5) 가설 5의 검증 = 61
    • 4. 결과의 해석 및 논의 = 62
    • Ⅴ. 결론 = 65
    • 1. 연구요약 및 시사점 = 65
    • 2. 한계점 및 미래 연구방향제시 = 67
    • 국내문헌 = 68
    • 외국문헌 = 70
    • 영문초록 = 74
    • 설문지 = 77
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼