RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      가족단위 축제참가자들의 축제참가과정에서 의사결정자의 역할 분석 = Study of the role of decision makers among family members in the process of participating in a local festival

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9986338

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study investigated who a primary decision maker or actual performer is in the process of festival participation. The process of participation in a local festival can be divided into five stages: decision making stage of before departure to the festival venue, in the middle of trip to the festival place, at the festival place, during coming back home from the festival, and after arrival at home. Moreover, type of family was considered an important component in this study in explaining the role of a primary decision maker or actual performer. Thus, the family type was categorized by a group of family with children and a group of family without children.
      Data for this study were collected through an on-site self-administered survey process. The sample used for this study consisted of festival goers who participated in the '2005 Gyenongju Korean Traditional Drink & Rice Cake Festival' with or without children. Questionnaires were distributed over the entire festival period of March 26 through 31, 2005. A total of 700 questionnaires were distributed to the participants in the festival during the festival period, and a total of 548 usable responses were collected for further data analysis steps. A total of 152 unusable questionnaires were ruled out because incomplete questionnaires.
      Descriptive statistics of frequency analysis showed the general questions of both families with and without children. A repeated measure of the general linear model (GLM) was selected to analyze differences of responses of decision makers or performers.
      The results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the husbands of family with children played a role as a decision maker regarding the judgment about time; for example, departure time from home, break time, leaving time from the destination, and arriving time. Also, results of the study revealed that the husbands from family with children
      showed a higher level of involvement with decision of types of accommodation.
      Second, wives of family with children were involved in budgeting- and planning-related decision making.
      Lastly, the results of differences in both cases of family with and without children were found. Husbands showed a tendency of being involved with car maintenance and payment for gasoline bill at the gas station. Wives indicated a high level of roles in suggestion to attend certain festivals, and they are also committed to decision related to meals. Furthermore, wives showed the buying power on souvenir-related purchasing, Thus, they indicated an influence of what to buy or not to buy and what limitation to buy. Wives revealed progressively enjoying the festival itself and they engage into finalizing the journey.
      The contribution of this study was to explore an influential decision making in the festival participation. The study aims to find out who plays more in part out roles during the family festival participation process and thus the process was divided into the five stages and family types were considered. The other contribution would be to make an endeavor that exercised twice preliminary examinations and a pre-test to increase reliability and validity of questionnaire items.
      One of weaknesses of this study was the fact that festival participants were not drawn from various types of festivals, The results of this study may not be generalized in other cases. Thus, more efforts should be made in considering children's age level. It means that future study should consider a role of children in festival participation decision making process. Although this kind of treatment has made in the family lifestyle research, this study did not cover this area. This study conducted on-site, and so there could be obstacles to answer questions that were related to during coming back from the venue and after arriving home from the festival. A future study should consider these matters to overcome possible problems.
      번역하기

      This study investigated who a primary decision maker or actual performer is in the process of festival participation. The process of participation in a local festival can be divided into five stages: decision making stage of before departure to the fe...

      This study investigated who a primary decision maker or actual performer is in the process of festival participation. The process of participation in a local festival can be divided into five stages: decision making stage of before departure to the festival venue, in the middle of trip to the festival place, at the festival place, during coming back home from the festival, and after arrival at home. Moreover, type of family was considered an important component in this study in explaining the role of a primary decision maker or actual performer. Thus, the family type was categorized by a group of family with children and a group of family without children.
      Data for this study were collected through an on-site self-administered survey process. The sample used for this study consisted of festival goers who participated in the '2005 Gyenongju Korean Traditional Drink & Rice Cake Festival' with or without children. Questionnaires were distributed over the entire festival period of March 26 through 31, 2005. A total of 700 questionnaires were distributed to the participants in the festival during the festival period, and a total of 548 usable responses were collected for further data analysis steps. A total of 152 unusable questionnaires were ruled out because incomplete questionnaires.
      Descriptive statistics of frequency analysis showed the general questions of both families with and without children. A repeated measure of the general linear model (GLM) was selected to analyze differences of responses of decision makers or performers.
      The results of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the husbands of family with children played a role as a decision maker regarding the judgment about time; for example, departure time from home, break time, leaving time from the destination, and arriving time. Also, results of the study revealed that the husbands from family with children
      showed a higher level of involvement with decision of types of accommodation.
      Second, wives of family with children were involved in budgeting- and planning-related decision making.
      Lastly, the results of differences in both cases of family with and without children were found. Husbands showed a tendency of being involved with car maintenance and payment for gasoline bill at the gas station. Wives indicated a high level of roles in suggestion to attend certain festivals, and they are also committed to decision related to meals. Furthermore, wives showed the buying power on souvenir-related purchasing, Thus, they indicated an influence of what to buy or not to buy and what limitation to buy. Wives revealed progressively enjoying the festival itself and they engage into finalizing the journey.
      The contribution of this study was to explore an influential decision making in the festival participation. The study aims to find out who plays more in part out roles during the family festival participation process and thus the process was divided into the five stages and family types were considered. The other contribution would be to make an endeavor that exercised twice preliminary examinations and a pre-test to increase reliability and validity of questionnaire items.
      One of weaknesses of this study was the fact that festival participants were not drawn from various types of festivals, The results of this study may not be generalized in other cases. Thus, more efforts should be made in considering children's age level. It means that future study should consider a role of children in festival participation decision making process. Although this kind of treatment has made in the family lifestyle research, this study did not cover this area. This study conducted on-site, and so there could be obstacles to answer questions that were related to during coming back from the venue and after arriving home from the festival. A future study should consider these matters to overcome possible problems.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 6
      • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 범위 = 7
      • 목차 = ⅰ
      • 제1장 서론 = 1
      • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
      • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 6
      • 제3절 연구의 방법 및 범위 = 7
      • 1. 연구의 방법 = 7
      • 2. 연구의 범위 = 8
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 9
      • 제1절 관광의사결정의 정의와 특징 및 관광자 행동요인 = 9
      • 1. 관광의사결정의 정의 = 9
      • 2. 관광의사결정의 특징 = 10
      • 3. 관광자 행동요인 = 16
      • 제2절 가족의 본질과 구조 및 가족관광의사결정과정 = 20
      • 1. 가족의 본질과 구조 = 20
      • 2. 가족관광의사결정의 정의 = 21
      • 3. 가족관광의사결정과정 = 24
      • 제3절 가족구성원의 역할구조와 상호영향력관계 및 가족특성에 따른 영향력 관계 = 32
      • 1. 가족구성원의 역할구조 = 32
      • 2. 가족구성원의 상호영향력 관계 = 38
      • 3. 가족특성에 따른 영향력 관계 = 40
      • 제4절 축제참가자의 축제관련 의사결정 = 43
      • 제5절 선행연구 요약 = 48
      • 제3장 연구방법의 설계 = 56
      • 제1절 연구모형의 설계와 가설의 설정 = 56
      • 1. 연구모형의 설계 = 56
      • 2. 가설의 설정 = 57
      • 제2절 연구방법의 설계 = 58
      • 1. 측정항목개발 = 58
      • 2. 설문지의 구성 = 60
      • 3. 분석방법 = 61
      • 4. 자료수집 = 64
      • 제4장 자료분석 및 분석결과 해석 = 67
      • 제1절 자료분석 = 67
      • 1. 응답자의 인구통계적 분석 = 67
      • 2. 가족단위 축제참가자들의 의사결정단계별 차이측정 = 72
      • 3. 축제에 자녀를 동반한 참가자와 축제에 자녀를 동반하지 않은 참가자들 사이에 가족단위 축제참가 의사결정자간의 차이검증 = 98
      • 제2절 분석결과 해석 = 108
      • 1. 자녀를 동반한 가족단위 측제참가자의 가족 구성원별 의사결정사항 및 실제행동에 대한 차이해석 = 108
      • 2. 자녀를 동반하지 않은 가족단위 축제참가자의 가족 구성원별 의사결정사항 및 실제행동에 대한 차이해석 = 117
      • 제5장 결론 = 123
      • 제1절 연구의 요약 = 123
      • 제2절 연구의 시사점 및 공헌도 = 128
      • 제3절 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향 = 132
      • 참고문헌 = 133
      • ABSTRACT = 158
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼