RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    간호사관생도들의 건강상태, 강인성 및 건강증진행위간의 관련성

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9982262

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대전 : 충남대학교 대학원, 2005

    • 학위논문사항

      학위(석사) -- 충남대학교 보건대학원 , 보건학 전공 , 2005. 2

    • 발행연도

      2005

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      614 판사항(20)

    • 발행국(도시)

      대전

    • 기타서명

      Relationship between health status, hardiness and health promoting behaviors among cadets in armed forces nursing academy

    • 형태사항

      36 p. ; 26 cm.

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 이태용
      참고문헌 : p. 29-33

    • 소장기관
      • 국립군산대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 충남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to assess to the perceived status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior among Cadets in AFNA. Further, the relationship between perceived health status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior were assessed.
    The research subjects were 289 cadets in AFNA obtained by all sample.
    These data were collected by self reporting questionnaire for five days from september 6 to september 10, 2004.
    The instruments used in this study were the health perception questionnaire (Ware, 1976), the health related hardiness scale(Pollock, 1986), and the health promotion lifestyle profile(Walker et al., 1987).
    The data were analyzed by Cronbach's Alpha, Means and standard deviations, t-test and ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression using SPSS program(version 10.0) program.
    The results of this study were as follows :
    1. The mean scores of variables were as follows: perceived health status was 3.44, hardiness was 2.90 and health promotion behaviors was 2.63. The highest subfactor of hardiness was control factor 2.66. Also, the highest subfactor of health promotion behaviors was interpersonal support factor 3.11 and the lowest subfactor of health promotion behaviors was health responsibility factor 2.20.
    2. The perceived health status showed significant differences according to health management(p=.002). Also, the hardiness showed significant differences according to health management(p=.000). Health promotion behaviors showed significant differences according to grade (p=.000), health management (p=.000), Push-up(p=.001).
    3. Health promotion behaviors were correlated with perceived health status(r=.379) and hardiness (r= -.471). Perceived health status were correlated with hardiness (r=-.414).
    4. Hardiness was the most influential variable on health promotion behavior (p=.000). Stepwise regression showed the 38% of the variance in health promotion behavior was explained by including health management, push-up, Perceived health status, grade.
    In conclusion, healthing invention programed need to be developed in consideration of the relationships between perceived health, hardiness and health promotion behavior. The finding of this study add to emerging scientific knowledge concerning how to their quality of life among cadets in AFNA
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to assess to the perceived status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior among Cadets in AFNA. Further, the relationship between perceived health status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior were assessed. The res...

    The purpose of this study was to assess to the perceived status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior among Cadets in AFNA. Further, the relationship between perceived health status, hardiness, and health promotion behavior were assessed.
    The research subjects were 289 cadets in AFNA obtained by all sample.
    These data were collected by self reporting questionnaire for five days from september 6 to september 10, 2004.
    The instruments used in this study were the health perception questionnaire (Ware, 1976), the health related hardiness scale(Pollock, 1986), and the health promotion lifestyle profile(Walker et al., 1987).
    The data were analyzed by Cronbach's Alpha, Means and standard deviations, t-test and ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient and stepwise multiple regression using SPSS program(version 10.0) program.
    The results of this study were as follows :
    1. The mean scores of variables were as follows: perceived health status was 3.44, hardiness was 2.90 and health promotion behaviors was 2.63. The highest subfactor of hardiness was control factor 2.66. Also, the highest subfactor of health promotion behaviors was interpersonal support factor 3.11 and the lowest subfactor of health promotion behaviors was health responsibility factor 2.20.
    2. The perceived health status showed significant differences according to health management(p=.002). Also, the hardiness showed significant differences according to health management(p=.000). Health promotion behaviors showed significant differences according to grade (p=.000), health management (p=.000), Push-up(p=.001).
    3. Health promotion behaviors were correlated with perceived health status(r=.379) and hardiness (r= -.471). Perceived health status were correlated with hardiness (r=-.414).
    4. Hardiness was the most influential variable on health promotion behavior (p=.000). Stepwise regression showed the 38% of the variance in health promotion behavior was explained by including health management, push-up, Perceived health status, grade.
    In conclusion, healthing invention programed need to be developed in consideration of the relationships between perceived health, hardiness and health promotion behavior. The finding of this study add to emerging scientific knowledge concerning how to their quality of life among cadets in AFNA

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 조사대상 및 방법 = 4
    • 1. 조사 대상 및 기간 = 4
    • 2. 조사 방법 및 내용 = 4
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • Ⅱ. 조사대상 및 방법 = 4
    • 1. 조사 대상 및 기간 = 4
    • 2. 조사 방법 및 내용 = 4
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 6
    • 4. 분석 방법 = 7
    • Ⅲ. 연구결과 = 8
    • 1. 대상자의 일반적 특성 = 8
    • 2. 건강상태, 강인성, 건강증진행위 정도 = 10
    • 3. 일반적 특성에 따른 건강산태, 강인성, 건강증진행위간의 차이 = 15
    • 4. 건강상태, 강인성, 건강증진행위와의 관계 = 19
    • 5. 건강증진행위에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 21
    • Ⅳ. 고찰 = 22
    • Ⅴ. 결론 = 27
    • 참고문헌 = 29
    • ABSTRACT = 34
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼