공인중개사의 전문직업성 구성요인에 관한 연구 = (The) study on the components of professionalism of the licensed real estate agents

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this paper is to examine the professionalism of the licensed real estate agents in korea on the basis of a set of survey data gathered from the licensed real estate agents, their clients and their assistants.
The professionalism is major characteristics of its professional.
The institution of the licensed real estate agents is established to manage the real estate market and to be under government control in order to protect property of nationals.
This study determines 4 components of its professionalism by political, sociological and legal approach.
Firstly, it is their ability to monopolize the resources of real estate distribution. Monopolization may be achieved by depriving the clients of the opportunities to approach other brokerage, direct transaction, or quasi-licensed real estate agents by requirement of specialized technical knowledge, experience and a period of training and that like.
There are various views to monopoly but the danger of direct transaction lies consensus. Futhermore, brokers, licensed real estate agents are the most positive.
Secondly, it is autonomy by professional society, the ability to be the sole definer, controller, and that like. There are, also, various views to autonomy but it is consensus that the society doesn't manage the state-sponsored test for licensing real estate and take part in the act of real estate brokerage to fix and improve.
Thirdly, it is professional dominance by which other professional or occupational groups in the brokerage institution, as assistances.
all workers are placed under the directive of the licensed real estate agent in the real estate brokerage.
The assistants can't have the authority of mediate by himself.
After qualifying, the judicial scrivener can mediate but the lawyer can't.
Fourthly, it is responsibility, which emphasizes the responsible action of licensed real estate agents, but they think the clients have more responsibility in the brokerage accident. and it is to show client the value of the real estate who don't know and oriented-public interest but wish to succeed in business for the settled income.
Fifthly, it is correlative analysis. In reality, monopoly of the knowledge is getting bigger, desire of dominance and responsibility are getting bigger, too.
Actually, since licensed real estate agents have the higher desire of autonomy but their society can't satisfy its members. As the autonomy of its members becomes higher and higher, they want to be settled. The higher desire of responsibility there is, the less autonomy remains and they are regulated by government.
According to the result of the study, the licensed real estate agents, the brokers bears responsibility and duty by act of brokerage and has monopoly of brokerage. therefore he are, mostly, strongly positive, active and actual.
Generally, the licensed real estate agents belonging to the office have the tendency of being passive, critical and ideal.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = i
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 = 2
• 제3절 선행 연구 동향 = 3
• 제2장 이론 및 제도 배경 = 5
• 제1절 전문직업성의 이론 = 5
• 1. 전문직업성의 개념 = 5
• 2. 전문직업성에 대한 사회학적 접근 = 8
• 3. 전문직업성에 대한 정치학적 접근 = 13
• 4. 전문직업성에 대한 법학적 접근 = 17
• 제2절 부동산 유통 전문직의 특성 = 20
• 1. 공인중개사 제도 성립 배경 = 20
• 2. 공인중개사 집단의 특성 = 22
• 3. 전문 직업성의 근원 = 33
• 4. 전문적 권위 = 38
• 제3장 연구설계 = 40
• 제1절 분석의 틀 = 40
• 제2절 자료수집 방법 = 41
• 1. 조사 대상 = 41
• 2. 표본의 일반적인 특성 = 42
• 3. 설문지 구성 = 45
• 4. 자료분석 = 47
• 제4장 공인중개사 직업전문성 구성요인 분석 = 48
• 제1절 변수의 신뢰도 검사 = 48
• 제2절 전문직업성 구성요인 분석 = 49
• 1. 전문적 지식의 독점 = 49
• 2. 전문직 단체에 의한 자율성 = 58
• 3. 업무의 지배성 = 69
• 4. 책임중개 = 74
• 5. 변수들의 상관관계 = 82
• 제5장 공인중개사 직업전문성의 집단간 분석 = 85
• 제1절 개업·소속공인중개사집단의 비교 = 85
• 1. 전문적 지식의 독점에 대한 비교·분석 = 85
• 2. 전문직 단체에 의한 자율성에 대한 비교·분석 = 87
• 3. 업무의 지배성에 대한 비교·분석 = 89
• 4. 책임중개에 대한 비교·분석 = 89
• 5. 일반사항에 대한 비교·분석 = 91
• 제2절 개업공인중개사집단과 일반인집단의 비교 = 93
• 1. 전문적 지식의 독점에 대한 비교·분석 = 93
• 2. 전문직 단체에 의한 자율성에 대한 비교·분석 = 94
• 3. 업무의 지배성에 대한 비교·분석 = 95
• 4. 책임중개에 대한 비교·분석 = 96
• 제3절 소속공인중개사집단과 중개보조원집단의 비교 = 98
• 1. 지식의 독점에 대한 비교·분석 = 98
• 2. 전문직 단체에 의한 자율성에 대한 비교·분석 = 99
• 3. 업무의 지배성에 대한 비교·분석 = 100
• 4. 책임중개에 대한 비교·분석 = 101
• 제6장 결론 = 103
• 제1절 요약 = 103
• 제2절 연구의 한계 = 107
• 〔참고문헌〕 = 108
• 부록 = 113
• abstract = 120