RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    관광동기 및 위험지각이 관광유형 선택과 관광후 행동에 미치는 영향 = (A) study on the effects of perceived risk and travel Motivation in travel typology choice and tourist behavior

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9682981

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 세종대학교 대학원, 2004

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 세종대학교 대학원 , 호텔관광경영학과 , 2005. 2

    • 발행연도

      2004

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      326.39 판사항(4)

    • DDC

      910.4 판사항(21)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      ⅶ, 175p. : 삽도, 표 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      지도교수: 김홍범
      참고문헌: p. 150-161

    • 소장기관
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
      • 동서대학교 민석도서관 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 세종대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was conducted to theoretically develop by out-bound tourist's behavior process of package tour. It explained perceived risk of tourist throughout researching difference by each level based on between tourist's before and after travel experience. It offers an integrated approach to understand tourist motivation and attempts to extend empirical evidence on the causal relationships among the push and pull motivation, perceived risk, and travel typology.
    A total of 441 usable surveys were collected from randomly selected out-bound travelers to North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. Four hypotheses were proposed and tested by SPSS 12.0 and LIMDEP 8.0 for the descriptive, the factor analysis, the reliability analysis, the multinomial logistic analysis, the discriminant analysis, the paired t-test analysis, the canonical analysis, and the one-way ANOVA analysis.
    The proposed hypotheses are attempted to identify: the impact of push and pull factor on travel typology choice, the impact of perceived risk on travel motivation and travel typology choice, the difference in perceived risk level according to tourist's behavior, the impact of travel typology on traveler's behavior.
    The results of this study indicates that hypotheses pertaining to objectives one showed that push and pull factors were significantly varied on travel typology choice and objective two exposed pre-perceived risk was significant between travel motivation and travel typology choice. Results of the hypothesis tests pertaining to objective three appeared that the differences between pre-perceived risk and perceived risk after travel were significant. It was significant that the effect of tourist behavior had differences from pre-perceived risk and perceived risk after travel. The result of testing hypothesis pertaining to objective four showed the impact of travel behavior on travel typology chosen by traveler which were significant.
    This study showed that the push motivation separated from the pull motivation determines the travel typology choice. This study revealed and confirmed the existence of the critical relationship among push and pull motivations, perceived risk, and travel typology choice. This finding suggested that it would be worthwhile for travel agency to make greater investments in their travel typology choice resources, in order to continue to enhance experiences.
    번역하기

    This study was conducted to theoretically develop by out-bound tourist's behavior process of package tour. It explained perceived risk of tourist throughout researching difference by each level based on between tourist's before and after travel experi...

    This study was conducted to theoretically develop by out-bound tourist's behavior process of package tour. It explained perceived risk of tourist throughout researching difference by each level based on between tourist's before and after travel experience. It offers an integrated approach to understand tourist motivation and attempts to extend empirical evidence on the causal relationships among the push and pull motivation, perceived risk, and travel typology.
    A total of 441 usable surveys were collected from randomly selected out-bound travelers to North America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania. Four hypotheses were proposed and tested by SPSS 12.0 and LIMDEP 8.0 for the descriptive, the factor analysis, the reliability analysis, the multinomial logistic analysis, the discriminant analysis, the paired t-test analysis, the canonical analysis, and the one-way ANOVA analysis.
    The proposed hypotheses are attempted to identify: the impact of push and pull factor on travel typology choice, the impact of perceived risk on travel motivation and travel typology choice, the difference in perceived risk level according to tourist's behavior, the impact of travel typology on traveler's behavior.
    The results of this study indicates that hypotheses pertaining to objectives one showed that push and pull factors were significantly varied on travel typology choice and objective two exposed pre-perceived risk was significant between travel motivation and travel typology choice. Results of the hypothesis tests pertaining to objective three appeared that the differences between pre-perceived risk and perceived risk after travel were significant. It was significant that the effect of tourist behavior had differences from pre-perceived risk and perceived risk after travel. The result of testing hypothesis pertaining to objective four showed the impact of travel behavior on travel typology chosen by traveler which were significant.
    This study showed that the push motivation separated from the pull motivation determines the travel typology choice. This study revealed and confirmed the existence of the critical relationship among push and pull motivations, perceived risk, and travel typology choice. This finding suggested that it would be worthwhile for travel agency to make greater investments in their travel typology choice resources, in order to continue to enhance experiences.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 4
    • 제3절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 5
    • 목차 = ⅰ
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제의 제기 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 목적 = 4
    • 제3절 연구의 방법과 범위 = 5
    • 제2장 이론적 고찰 = 8
    • 제1절 위험지각 = 8
    • 1. 위험지각의 개념 및 구성요소 = 8
    • 2. 관광목적지 선택과정과 위험지각 = 15
    • 3. 위험지각에 대한 선행연구의 종합 = 23
    • 제2절 관광동기 = 27
    • 1. 관광동기의 개념 및 종류 = 27
    • 2. 추진 및 유인요인에 대한 선행연구 = 28
    • 제3절 관광유형 = 34
    • 1. 관광유형에 대한 개념 및 분류 = 34
    • 2. 관광유형에 대한 선행연구 = 35
    • 제4절 관광동기, 위험지각, 관광유형, 관광후 행동의 상호관계 = 39
    • 1. 관광동기와 관광유형 = 39
    • 2. 관광유형과 관광후 행동 = 40
    • 3. 위험지각과 관광후 행동 = 40
    • 제3장 조사 및 분석방법의 설계 = 42
    • 제1절 연구모형과 가설의 설정 = 42
    • 1. 연구모형의 설계 = 42
    • 2. 연구가설의 설정 = 44
    • 3. 다중확률선택모형(Multinomial Logit Model)의 구조 = 48
    • 제2절 조사설계 및 분석방법 = 50
    • 1. 조사표본의 설계 = 50
    • 2. 변수의 조작적 정의 및 설문지의 구성 = 52
    • 3. 자료의 분석방법 및 절차 = 59
    • 제4장 분석결과 = 63
    • 제1절 표본의 일반적 특성 = 63
    • 1. 표본의 특성 = 63
    • 2. 연구모형 변수들의 특성 = 66
    • 제2절 측정척도의 검증 = 74
    • 1. 측정척도의 타당성 및 신뢰도분석 = 74
    • 2. 집단의 특성 분석 = 89
    • 제3절 연구가설의 검증 = 96
    • 1. 연구가설의 검증 = 96
    • 2. 가설검증의 요약 = 135
    • 제5장 결론 = 142
    • 제1절 연구의 요약 및 시사점 = 142
    • 1. 연구의 요약 = 142
    • 2. 연구의 시사점 = 146
    • 제2절 연구의 한계 및 향후 연구과제 = 148
    • 참고문헌 = 150
    • 설문지 = 162
    • 부록 = 169
    • Abstract = 174
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼