RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    서술형 수행평가를 통한 교사피드백이 수학학습에 미치는 영향 = (An) Effects of Teachers Feedback through Descriptive Performance Test on Mathematics Learning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9465481

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to find what effects a descriptive performance test as on a student's matematics learning. For the purpose, participants students were received a teacher's feedback through the descriptive open-questions in a class, with its result analyzed their learning attitude and mathematical potential.
    To accomplish the purpose, the subjects of the study are determined as follows;
    1) does a teacher's feedback through the performance test items of a descriptive open-questions has any effect on students' attitude toward mathematics learning?
    2) does a teacher's feedback through the perfoFmance test items of a descriptive open-questions has any effect on students' mathematic potential?
    Participants were 2 classes of the 3rd grade of a middle school, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon, divided into Group Ⅰ(with a teacher's feedback through marks) and Group Ⅱ(with a teacher's feedback through right or wrong judgment). The tool was KED's(1992) Mathematics Learning Attitude Test and a Test for Mathenlatic Potential for pre and post- test in common.
    As a result of analyzing the effects of a teacher's feedback to descriptive performance test on students' learning potential, it can be concluded as follows;
    First, there are significant difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ in self-concept of mathematics, attitude toward mathematics, and learning habits of mathematics(p<.05). It suggests that performance test with a teacher's mark feedback would be more effective teaching approach to improve students' mathematics leaming attitude than the test with a teacher's right or wrong judgment feedback.
    Second, there are significant difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ in self-confidence of mathematics, flexibility of mathematics, mathematic willing, mathematic reflection, and mathematic value(p<.05). It indicates that performance test with a teacher's mark feedback would be a more useful teaching approach to improve students' mathematic potential than the test with a teacher's right or wrong judgment.
    Therefore, it is found that a teacher's mark feedback has a positive effect on students' mathematics learning attitude and mathematic potential by giving students a concrete scores to their mathematic solution, leading students to have interest in mathematics rather than giving it up at first. The implication is that if a teacher checks a wrong answer on performance test and lets students know it by working out the mathematic items, rather than informing students of their scores, students will also check their wrong answer, realize how the items should be solved, build a good understanding and concepts of mathematics.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to find what effects a descriptive performance test as on a student's matematics learning. For the purpose, participants students were received a teacher's feedback through the descriptive open-questions in a class, with i...

    The purpose of the study was to find what effects a descriptive performance test as on a student's matematics learning. For the purpose, participants students were received a teacher's feedback through the descriptive open-questions in a class, with its result analyzed their learning attitude and mathematical potential.
    To accomplish the purpose, the subjects of the study are determined as follows;
    1) does a teacher's feedback through the performance test items of a descriptive open-questions has any effect on students' attitude toward mathematics learning?
    2) does a teacher's feedback through the perfoFmance test items of a descriptive open-questions has any effect on students' mathematic potential?
    Participants were 2 classes of the 3rd grade of a middle school, Daedeok-gu, Daejeon, divided into Group Ⅰ(with a teacher's feedback through marks) and Group Ⅱ(with a teacher's feedback through right or wrong judgment). The tool was KED's(1992) Mathematics Learning Attitude Test and a Test for Mathenlatic Potential for pre and post- test in common.
    As a result of analyzing the effects of a teacher's feedback to descriptive performance test on students' learning potential, it can be concluded as follows;
    First, there are significant difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ in self-concept of mathematics, attitude toward mathematics, and learning habits of mathematics(p<.05). It suggests that performance test with a teacher's mark feedback would be more effective teaching approach to improve students' mathematics leaming attitude than the test with a teacher's right or wrong judgment feedback.
    Second, there are significant difference between Group Ⅰ and Group Ⅱ in self-confidence of mathematics, flexibility of mathematics, mathematic willing, mathematic reflection, and mathematic value(p<.05). It indicates that performance test with a teacher's mark feedback would be a more useful teaching approach to improve students' mathematic potential than the test with a teacher's right or wrong judgment.
    Therefore, it is found that a teacher's mark feedback has a positive effect on students' mathematics learning attitude and mathematic potential by giving students a concrete scores to their mathematic solution, leading students to have interest in mathematics rather than giving it up at first. The implication is that if a teacher checks a wrong answer on performance test and lets students know it by working out the mathematic items, rather than informing students of their scores, students will also check their wrong answer, realize how the items should be solved, build a good understanding and concepts of mathematics.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 3
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 3
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 4
    • 5. 기대되는 효과 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 1. 수행평가 의의 및 필요성 = 6
    • 2. 서술형 수행평가 = 8
    • 3. 피드백 = 12
    • 4. 선행연구 = 18
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 및 절차 = 21
    • 1. 연구기간 및 연구대상 = 21
    • 2. 연구설계 = 21
    • 3. 검사도구 = 23
    • 3) 서술형 수행평가 (문항 예시) = 25
    • Ⅳ. 결론 = 29
    • 1. 분석 및 결과 = 29
    • 2. 결론 = 40
    • <참고문헌> = 44
    • ABSTRACT = 48
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼