경관영향평가 항목선정에 관한 연구 = Study on evaluation item selecting of landscape impact assessment

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research which it sees pushes and only each territory the bay it knows, until natural mode of life territory there is the questionable matter of the place where it searches the Landscape Impact Assessment item from overview viewpoint which includes. The concept which is a landscape which will reach it re-took a triangular position, literature data it led and an objectivity evaluation item it selected. When it summarizes the result, with after words there is it will be able to arrange together.
1. Literature research it led and in landscape impact assessment evaluation item 「variety」, 「place characteristic of view」, 「beauty of landscape」, 「thorn volume」 it selected back total 17 items time from view resoures.
And 「a animal-plant sort variety」, 「the greens area」, 「the map of life the nature」, 「waterway system」, inclined ratio selected back total 21 items from landscape mode of life resources territory.
2. Before question investigating against the landscape expert group it investigated the important degree as the landscape concept against the landscape architecture subject students at reserve question investigation phase and evaluation item.
Against the expert group mail question investigation it led and it received a statistical analysis with the base which will reach it executed the answer back of 61 issues and.
3. Question of 61 issues which had recovery a technical statistical analysis, a reliability analysis, an interrelation analysis the SPSS for windower ver 10.0k which is a statistical processing program which it used and it executed.
4. From the question regarding the introduction of landscape impact assessment in 7 perfect score it showed a high demand degree with 6.1463.
It appeared transfer highly from the investigation against a basis of assessment. but, it was visible a low score from two standards of 「the soil」. 「The uniform characteristic」 item of the other side 「bottom material feeling」 each item importance of volunteering territory 「sky line analysis」 to appear time most highly from investigation showed a low important degree. There is a value from in the clause nail of landscape mode of life resources territory 「importance biotop preservation」 item to be most important, but 「the water」, 「climate」,「the soil」item was appeared a low important degree relativy.
5. While point development work damage minimization of primarily topography, 「animal-plant sort variety」it was this importance from importance investigation as each unit enterprise importance evaluation item and 「the climate」, 「the soil」 item appeared a head of a family low important degree in the item which will be considered. While line development work damage minimization of primarily topography, 「importance biotop preservation」, but 「the climate」, 「the soil」 item appeared a head of a family low important degree with the sameness to appear highly. While area development work, the area characteristic of view, 「the greens area」, 「analysis of sky line」 the important degree where the back is high 「the climate」, 「the soil」 item was visible a low-end important degree with the sameness to seem.
6. Statistical analysis it led and it did an instance application. Instance shoes two which falls li it executed the viewable evaluation regarding four nine regions.
The evaluation item analyzed 「thorn volume analysis」, 「sort variety」, 「the greens passage/connection characteristic/the mobile passage」against the item of back.
It shows the result which is good from all evaluations the pressure of development after direction is added an extra weight and the building which is in the process of expanding and contracting plentifully is witnessed and feed with the fact that the legal regulation must become accomplished it becomes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = i
• -표목차- = ii
• -그림 목차- = v
• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구사 = 3
• 3. 경관의 개념 = 7
• Ⅱ. 연구범위 및 방법 = 11
• 1. 연구범위 = 11
• (1) 시간적 범위 = 11
• (2) 내용적 범위 = 11
• 2. 연구방법 = 12
• (1) 국내 경관영향평가 항목의 문제점 = 12
• (2) 문헌연구에 의한 예비 평가항목 도출 = 12
• (3) 예비평가항목의 타당성 검증 및 사업별 중점평가항목 선정 = 13
• (4) 사례지 적용 = 13
• Ⅲ. 결과 및 고찰 = 16
• 1. 국내 경관영향평가 항목의 문제점 = 16
• (1) 환경영향평가서(Environment Impact Assessment) = 16
• (2) 제주도 경관영향평가(Landscape Impact Assessment of Jeju) = 18
• 2. 문헌연구를 통한 예비평가 항목 설정 = 19
• (1) 시각경관평가항목 = 19
• (2) 경관생태평가항목 = 23
• (3) 예비평가항목 = 26
• 3. 예비평가 항목의 타당성 검증 = 28
• (1) 예비 설문조사 = 28
• (2) 전문가 설문조사 = 32
• 1) 빈도 분석 = 32
• 2) 신뢰도 분석 = 33
• 3) 기술통계분석 = 36
• 4) 상관관계분석 = 41
• 5) 요인 분석 = 46
• 4. 각 단위 사업별 중점 평가항목으로서의 중요성 = 51
• 5. 사례지 적용 = 30
• (1) 사례지 개황 = 60
• (2) 경관평가 방법 = 62
• (3) 평가분석 및 고찰 = 62
• Ⅳ. 결론 = 71
• 참고문헌 = 73
• (abstract) = 78
• 부록1 전문가 설문지 = 80
• 부록2 신두리 사구 식물상 = 88