RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    창의성과 자아개념 그리고 도덕성의 관계 = (The) Study on the Relationship among Creativity, Self-Concept and Morality

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9212354

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the present research was to examine the study on the relationship among creativity, self-concept and morality.
    The research questions were as follows :
    First, what is the relationship between creativity and self-concept?
    Second, what is the relationship between creativity and morality?
    Third, what is the relationship between self-concept and morality?
    The subjects of this study were 265 children, 141 males and 124 females. All the subjects were 6th graders of elementary school located in seoul.
    The materials used for measuring variables creativity, self-concept and morality- were 'What Kind of Person Are You', 'Self-concept Inventory' and 'the measurement of moral self' respectively.
    The data were analysed by SPSS/WIN 10.0 program for correlation, t-test and regression.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows:
    Overall there were no significant correlations among the scores of three constructs.
    However some of the sub-concepts of each construct showed positive significant correlations.
    Acceptance of authority, self-confidence and inguisitiveness in creativity were correlated behavioral conduct, athletic component and social acceptance in self-concept.
    Acceptance of authority in creativity was correlated the real me, responsibility for the real me, and commitment to ideals or self in morality.
    Sub-concepts in self-concept were correlated sub-concepts in morality.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the present research was to examine the study on the relationship among creativity, self-concept and morality. The research questions were as follows : First, what is the relationship between creativity and self-concept? Second, what...

    The purpose of the present research was to examine the study on the relationship among creativity, self-concept and morality.
    The research questions were as follows :
    First, what is the relationship between creativity and self-concept?
    Second, what is the relationship between creativity and morality?
    Third, what is the relationship between self-concept and morality?
    The subjects of this study were 265 children, 141 males and 124 females. All the subjects were 6th graders of elementary school located in seoul.
    The materials used for measuring variables creativity, self-concept and morality- were 'What Kind of Person Are You', 'Self-concept Inventory' and 'the measurement of moral self' respectively.
    The data were analysed by SPSS/WIN 10.0 program for correlation, t-test and regression.
    The results of this study are summarized as follows:
    Overall there were no significant correlations among the scores of three constructs.
    However some of the sub-concepts of each construct showed positive significant correlations.
    Acceptance of authority, self-confidence and inguisitiveness in creativity were correlated behavioral conduct, athletic component and social acceptance in self-concept.
    Acceptance of authority in creativity was correlated the real me, responsibility for the real me, and commitment to ideals or self in morality.
    Sub-concepts in self-concept were correlated sub-concepts in morality.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차 = i
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 목차 = i
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 5
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 1. 창의성 = 6
    • 1) 창의성의 정의 = 6
    • 2) 창의적 성향검사 = 8
    • 2. 자아개념 = 8
    • 1) 자아개념 = 8
    • 3. 도덕성 = 10
    • 1) 도덕성 = 10
    • 2) 도덕적 자아 = 12
    • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 14
    • 1. 연구대상 = 14
    • 2. 연구도구 = 14
    • 1) 창의성 측정도구 = 14
    • (1) 하위 구성개념 = 15
    • (2) 신뢰도 = 16
    • (3) 타당도 = 16
    • 2) 자아개념 측정도구 = 16
    • (1) 하위 구성개념 = 16
    • (2) 신뢰도 = 18
    • (3) 타당도 = 19
    • 3) 도덕적 자아 측정도구 = 19
    • (1) 하위 구성개념 = 19
    • (2) 신뢰도 = 22
    • (3) 타당도 = 23
    • 3. 연구절차 = 24
    • 4. 자료의 분석 = 24
    • Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 25
    • 1. 창의성과 자아개념 = 25
    • 2. 창의성과 도덕성 = 28
    • 3. 자아개념과 도덕성 = 29
    • Ⅴ. 논의 = 32
    • 1. 창의성과 자아개념간의 관계 = 32
    • 2. 창의성과 도덕성간의 관계 = 34
    • 3. 자아개념과 도덕성의 관계 = 35
    • 참고문헌 = 37
    • 부록 = 42
    • ABSTRACT = 56
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼