RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      학습장애아의 학습전략 효과에 관한 메타분석 = Meta-Analysis on the Effect of Learning Strategies of Learning Disabilities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T9138288

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the size effect by meta-analysis considering studies on learning strategies of learning disabilities.
      In order to achieve the purpose, the following questions were formulated:
      First, to what effect does learning strategies influence learning disabilities?
      Second, to what effect do cognitive strategies, reading strategies, mathematics strategies and other learning strategies influence learning disabilities?
      Third, to what effect do reading, writing, mathematical problem solving, learning achievement, affective and cognitive ability influence learning disabilities?
      Fourth, to what effect does each area applied by each learning strategy?
      For such studies, we have used meta-analysis to measure the effect. The basic formula for such analysis is as follows:
      We divide the difference between the mean score of the experiment group and that of the control group by the standard deviation.
      The finding can be summarized as follows:
      First, the meta-analysis result on the effect of all learning strategies of learning disabilities is 1.1266. This is a big effect. This means that if we set the control group at 50%, then there is a 37% improvement.
      Second, the meta-analysis result on the specific learning strategies with the learning disabilities from highest to lowest is mathematical: (1.4440), other learning: (1.2808), reading: (1.2079) and cognitive: (0.8481).
      Third, the meta-analysis result on each applied area to the learning disabilities from highest to lowest is writing, learning achievement, mathematical problem solving, cognitive, reading and affective ability.
      Fourth, the meta-analysis result on the effect of each area applied by each learning strategy shows the overall effect.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the size effect by meta-analysis considering studies on learning strategies of learning disabilities. In order to achieve the purpose, the following questions were formulated: First, to what effect does le...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate the size effect by meta-analysis considering studies on learning strategies of learning disabilities.
      In order to achieve the purpose, the following questions were formulated:
      First, to what effect does learning strategies influence learning disabilities?
      Second, to what effect do cognitive strategies, reading strategies, mathematics strategies and other learning strategies influence learning disabilities?
      Third, to what effect do reading, writing, mathematical problem solving, learning achievement, affective and cognitive ability influence learning disabilities?
      Fourth, to what effect does each area applied by each learning strategy?
      For such studies, we have used meta-analysis to measure the effect. The basic formula for such analysis is as follows:
      We divide the difference between the mean score of the experiment group and that of the control group by the standard deviation.
      The finding can be summarized as follows:
      First, the meta-analysis result on the effect of all learning strategies of learning disabilities is 1.1266. This is a big effect. This means that if we set the control group at 50%, then there is a 37% improvement.
      Second, the meta-analysis result on the specific learning strategies with the learning disabilities from highest to lowest is mathematical: (1.4440), other learning: (1.2808), reading: (1.2079) and cognitive: (0.8481).
      Third, the meta-analysis result on each applied area to the learning disabilities from highest to lowest is writing, learning achievement, mathematical problem solving, cognitive, reading and affective ability.
      Fourth, the meta-analysis result on the effect of each area applied by each learning strategy shows the overall effect.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 내용 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 학습장애아의 학습전략 = 4
      • 목차
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 내용 = 3
      • Ⅱ. 학습장애아의 학습전략 = 4
      • 1. 학습장애와 기타 유사 명칭 구별 = 4
      • 1) 학습장애 = 4
      • 2) 학습부진 = 6
      • 3) 학습지진 = 8
      • 2. 학습전략 = 9
      • 1) 학습전략의 정의 = 9
      • 2) 학습전략의 유형 = 11
      • (1) 인지 전략 = 11
      • (2) 읽기 전략 = 11
      • (3) 수학 전략 = 12
      • Ⅲ. 메타분석의 이론과 방법 = 13
      • 1. 정의와 특징 = 13
      • 2. 메타분석의 장점 = 14
      • 3. 메타분석 방법 = 15
      • Ⅳ. 연구문제 = 17
      • Ⅴ. 연구방법 = 18
      • 1. 자료의 선정과 수집 = 18
      • 2. 자료의 분석 = 18
      • 3. 자료의 처리 = 20
      • Ⅵ. 결과 및 해석 = 23
      • Ⅶ. 논의, 결론 및 제언 = 31
      • 1. 논의 = 31
      • 2. 결론 = 33
      • 3. 제언 = 34
      • 참고문헌 = 36
      • 부록 = 39
      • ABSTRACT = 45
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼