Tax avoidance in this study is defined as the reduction of tax liability by illegal or intentional purposes. Though tax avoidance is serious crime, most taxpayers don't think it is not a serious crime. When they are getting caught by tax auditor, They...
Tax avoidance in this study is defined as the reduction of tax liability by illegal or intentional purposes. Though tax avoidance is serious crime, most taxpayers don't think it is not a serious crime. When they are getting caught by tax auditor, They think they had bad luck. The purpose of this thesis is to recognize the factors affecting tax avoidance, to verify the association of tax avoidance and tax ethics, psychological burden, operating performance, income level and to test the significance of the differences of groups by tax fidelity.
Factor analysis and Cronbach a test are used to test the validity and reliability. Regression and t-test are used to analyze data.
Hypotheses to achieve research purposes are as follows;
Hypothesis 1 : Taxpayers with high tax ethics will have low tax avoidance tendency.
Hypothesis 2 : Taxpayers with high psychological burden about tax audit will have low tax avoidance tendency.
Hypothesis 3 : Taxpayers think that tax would be determined by other factors rather than income level, will have high tax avoidance tendency.
Hypothesis 4 : In the case of much easily concealed tax data, it will result high tax avoidance.
Hypothesis 5 : Taxpayers with high income level will have high tax avoidance tendency.
Hypothesis 6-1 : Groups by tax fidelity will have different tax ethics attitude.
Hypothesis 6-2 : Groups by tax fidelity will have different tax avoidance tendency.
The research findings of empirical research are as follows
Empirical research analyzed hypotheses through regression and t-test. Dependent variable as tax avoidance was measured by Index 1, and Index index). Independent variables are tax ethics, psychological burden, operating performance, concealment of tax data, and income level.
First, tax ethics variable has a significant effect on the tax avoidance. The sign of regression coefficient is negative. It can be explained high tax ethics results low tax avoidance. This result is coincide with the anticipation.
Second, psychological burden also has a positive significant effect on the tax avoidance. This result is the adverse of expected sign. It can be interpreted contrarily that taxpayers who evade much more tax have more psychological burden. The hypothesis that possible concealment of tax data will increase tax avoidance was not supported significantly. Income level has a significant effect on tax avoidance and positive sign. This result indicates higher income taxpayers tend to be more tax avoidable.
An analysis of behavioral dimension of taxpayers indicates omission of income and overstatement of expenses are occurred frequently in Korea. When they took tax audit, they lied to the tax auditor. Taxpayers have much more negative attitude about the tax avoidance than in U.S.A. In Korea taxpayers have sensitive response about tax problem. They have negative attitude to their neighbour or the same trade taxpayers. Contrary taxpayers think they pay too much taxes than other taxpayers. They complain the administrative inefficiency of tax authority. Tax ethics attitude of groups by tax fidelity have differences significantly. Groups by tax fidelity have significantly different tax avoidance tendency.