住居環境改善事業의 施行方式에 관한 硏究 : 大邱廣域市를 中心으로 = A Reform Scheme in Enforcement Method of Residential Environment Betterment Project

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

While passing through rapid industrialization and the growth of cities since the 1960’s, turning into slums of city such as reckless occurrence of outworn houses and overpopulated area in residential environment has appeared.
To solve this problem, government established ‘Provisional complementary lows for urban low-income classesJ in 1989 and it‘s expected to be carried out until 2004. Thus, this study would like to present a direction for residential environment betterment for resident in slum area by looking about developmental process of residential - 46 - environment betterment project and analyzing physical character of district with problems-grasping through questionnaire survey on local residents.
Re-developing project including residential environment betterment project is a policy one to which the social-policy approach of low-income classes housing stability and the city-development character are demanded, redeveloping project of outworn houses area so far has given priority to urban environment betterment side rather to residential stability side of low-income classes. When considering this point, residential environment betterment project has met a problem in the process of enforcement, but it must be a desirable redeveloping direction on the side of raising policy equity principle in the urban development-oriented project. It may be effective on the land-use aspect with loosing of building-to-land ratio, floor area ratio in small lot and applying of parking lot law exception, but with it, that district has changed into poor housing area again with house-crowded area, infringement of ventilation and right to sunshine, parking difficulties.
After setting a basic minimum residential environment model for life worthy of man, rather than making improvement of a structure easy by loosing all kinds of restricts, and then within that area, change of direction toward securing public facilities, prescribing an item as an exception and then deciding various project form, should be tried.
Also, in residential environment betterment project, residential security of low-income classes is the most important thing, thereup guarantee of income would have to be followed. In reality, in case of the district where project is completed by joint dwelling houses construction method, frequent removal tendency, not settling down for a longtime, has appeared. Its reason seems to be that income structure betterment for low-income classes was not or not quite satisfactory with increased residential expenses also as a factor.
Because our housing policy has laid stress on house itself, I think that it’s impossible to achieve success in outworn housing-related policy. Low-income residents also should not think that they. are left out of society or not shift the responsibility for poverty on society, when they participate in society voluntarily with positiveness, hosing policy for low-income residents would be stabilized.
Finally, in the unified laws for residential area stability to be prepared in the future, an enforcement scheme would have to be - 48 - made so that distinctive work carrying-out of residential environment betterment project in special exception regulations, construction method, and financial support could be made considering the characteristics of this project within the area of urban re - development.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• I. 硏究目的 = 1
• II. 住居環境改善事業의 導入背景과 制度的 考察 = 3
• 1. 住居環境改善事業의 導入背景 = 3
• 2. 住居環境改善事業의 制度的 考察 = 7
• 가.地區指定 = 7
• 1) 地區指定의 基準 = 7
• 2) 地區指定의 要件 = 8
• 3) 地區指定時 調査事項 = 9
• 나. 住居環境改善計劃의 樹立 = 10
• 1) 住居環境改善計劃의 樹立基準 = 10
• 2) 住居環境改善計劃의 樹立 = 10
• 다. 住居環境改善事業의 事業方式 = 13
• 1) 現支改良方式 = 13
• 2) 換地方式 = 13
• 3) 共同住宅建設方式 = 14
• 라. 關聯規定의 特例 = 15
• 1) 建築關聯 規定의 特例 = 15
• 2) 住宅建設促進法 관련 規定의 特例 = 16
• 마. 住居環境改善事業과 都市再開發事業의 特徵 比較 = 17
• III. 住居環境改善事業地區의 物理的 特徵 = 20
• 1. 建設方式別 事業施行 現況 = 20
• 2. 住居環境改善事業地區의 物理的 特徵 = 21
• 가. 標高 및 傾斜度 = 21
• 나. 筆地規模 및 國·公有地 現況 = 22
• 다. 居住密度 現況 = 24
• 3. 事例分析 = 25
• 가. 現地改良方式 = 25
• 나. 共同住宅方式 = 28
• IV. 住居環境改善事業의 問題點과 改善方向 = 34
• 1. 住居環境改善事業의 問題點 分析 = 34
• 가. 過密開發을 조장하는 特例 = 34
• 나. 建設方式 選定의 問題點 = 36
• 다. 地區의 特性 반영 부족 = 37
• 라. 住宅再開發事業과 類似함에도 連繫性 不足 = 37
• 마. 所得構造改善 없는 住居環境改善事業 = 38
• 2. 住居環境改善事業의 改善方向 = 40
• 가. 住居環境의 質的 향상을 위한 改善計劃 樹立 = 40
• 나. 住民意見에 따른 改善方式 選定 = 40
• 다. 다양한 建設方式 導入 = 41
• 라. 住居環境改善事業을 住宅再開發計劃에 包含 = 41
• 마. 低所得 住民을 위한 福祉政策과 連繫 = 42
• V. 結論 = 43