RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    보육시설 과학교육 교수방법에 있어 교사변인에 관한 연구 = A Study of the Teacher Variables on Teaching Methods of Science Education in Child Care Center

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8960141

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to examine what type of teaching method was preferred by caregivers for science education in day-care centers and whether their background variables made any differences to the preference.
    The research questions were posed as below:
    1. What type of teaching method is favored by caregivers for science education in day-care centers?
    2. Are their science teaching methods different according to background variables including personal, work and science-related ones?
    3. What makes them to find it difficult to teach science?
    The subjects in this study were 300 caregivers in day-care centers from the city of Jinju and its adjacent areas. They were asked to select one of Biddulph's three teaching styles when a survey was conducted.
    The findings of this study were as follows:
    Based on the findings of the study, there are some suggestions about future research efforts and more successful science education for preschoolers:
    First, the caregivers were asked to choose one of Biddulph's three teaching styles, and their career, part of the personal variable, was identified as a factor to affect their preference for teaching method.
    The questionnaire method was put to use to find out what type of teaching method they relied on for science education, but direct observation is called for in the future.
    Second, there appeared significant relationship between preference for interaction method, one of Biddulph's three teaching styles, and the working variable among the caregivers in charge of multiage class and kindergarten class. It's required to make a more efficient and specialized approach toward the ultimate object of science education for preschoolers and teaching method.
    Third, regarding the possible impact of the background variables on favored teaching method, it's found that teaching method wasn't determined by any single factor. The selection of teaching method was a complex process where different factors worked on.
    When an attempt to envision teaching methods and strategies for preschoolers is made, it's mandatory to allow for caregiver, young children, teaching equipment and environmental condition above all.
    Therefore, how caregivers look at existing science education for preschoolers should be examined first before paying attention to preferred teaching methods.
    Their view should be investigated from different angles to identify what problems there are and to find a solution, and this would make a great contribution to science education for preschoolers.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to examine what type of teaching method was preferred by caregivers for science education in day-care centers and whether their background variables made any differences to the preference. The research questions were pos...

    The purpose of this study was to examine what type of teaching method was preferred by caregivers for science education in day-care centers and whether their background variables made any differences to the preference.
    The research questions were posed as below:
    1. What type of teaching method is favored by caregivers for science education in day-care centers?
    2. Are their science teaching methods different according to background variables including personal, work and science-related ones?
    3. What makes them to find it difficult to teach science?
    The subjects in this study were 300 caregivers in day-care centers from the city of Jinju and its adjacent areas. They were asked to select one of Biddulph's three teaching styles when a survey was conducted.
    The findings of this study were as follows:
    Based on the findings of the study, there are some suggestions about future research efforts and more successful science education for preschoolers:
    First, the caregivers were asked to choose one of Biddulph's three teaching styles, and their career, part of the personal variable, was identified as a factor to affect their preference for teaching method.
    The questionnaire method was put to use to find out what type of teaching method they relied on for science education, but direct observation is called for in the future.
    Second, there appeared significant relationship between preference for interaction method, one of Biddulph's three teaching styles, and the working variable among the caregivers in charge of multiage class and kindergarten class. It's required to make a more efficient and specialized approach toward the ultimate object of science education for preschoolers and teaching method.
    Third, regarding the possible impact of the background variables on favored teaching method, it's found that teaching method wasn't determined by any single factor. The selection of teaching method was a complex process where different factors worked on.
    When an attempt to envision teaching methods and strategies for preschoolers is made, it's mandatory to allow for caregiver, young children, teaching equipment and environmental condition above all.
    Therefore, how caregivers look at existing science education for preschoolers should be examined first before paying attention to preferred teaching methods.
    Their view should be investigated from different angles to identify what problems there are and to find a solution, and this would make a great contribution to science education for preschoolers.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 표목차 = iii
    • 그림목차 = iv
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 목차
    • 표목차 = iii
    • 그림목차 = iv
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구문제 = 5
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 6
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 1. 유아 과학교육의 중요성과 목적 = 7
    • 2. 유아 과학교육의 내용 = 13
    • 3. 유아 과학교육의 방법 = 18
    • III. 연구방법 = 40
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 40
    • 2. 연구 도구 = 46
    • 3. 연구 절차 = 48
    • 4. 자료 처리 = 48
    • IV. 결과 및 논의 = 49
    • 1. 보육시설 과학교육 교수방법 유형 = 49
    • 2. 보육시설 교사변인에 따른 과학 교수방법 = 50
    • 3. 유아과학 교육에서 교사가 어려움을 느끼는 이유 = 65
    • V. 결론 = 67
    • 참고문헌 = 69
    • 부록 = 74
    • 영문요약(Abstract) = 88
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼