RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    학교 교육 과정 개발·운영에 있어서 교육 주체의 권리와 그 한계

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8959884

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구: 대구교육대학교 교육대학원, 2003

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2003

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      375

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      i,64p.: 삽도; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌 : p.60-62

    • 소장기관
      • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present study deaBt with the issue concerning the rights & its limitations of the state, schooBs, teachers and parents, which are relevant entities in developing and operating school education curricula. The objectives of this study were to identify problems with the
    current development and operation of school education curricula, and the causes of the problems based on historical and legal backgrounds. With regard to these purposes, three research problems to be discussed were defined as follows.
    First, this study examined the issue of justness of the concept of public education in contemporary society through the histoncal background and developmental process of public education, which are the bases of current development and operation of school education curricula. Second, this study considered the constitutiona]ity of educational ideas on the right of education defined in the constitution and other education-related laws and regulations, and based on the findings, examined the legality of education curriculum doveLopment and operation policies conducted by the state. Third, based on the discussion above, this study examined specifically the right of schools, teachers, parents and students, which are relevant entities in developing and operating school education curricula in each school, as wel] as the relationships among the entities. As a result of this study based on the historical and legal background of public educatien to solve these research problems, the following conclusions were drawn.
    Public education started as family-based private education fell into the national system as the state was established. In the process the state that tool over the dominant position in education from parents strengthened ideological Instruction for the political and economical interest of the ruling group. The current 7th Education Curriculum is a representative example that shows clearly the intention to propagate neo-liberalism. Thus the government's exclusive right on education lost its justness. As for legal issue, the national po]icies related to the current development and operation of school education curricula are contrary to the basic idea of securing people's right to education specified in the Constitution, and provisilons related to school education curricula in subordinate education-related lalvs and regulations are likely to violate the Constitution.
    In conclusion, the government's policies on the development and operation of school education curricula lack the basis of justness and legality. Thus, it is required to reconsider the government's exclusive development and operation of school education curricula and reestablish the statuses of education entities so that a group of educational experts lead the development and operation, and the state, schools, parents and students participate in it.

    번역하기

    The present study deaBt with the issue concerning the rights & its limitations of the state, schooBs, teachers and parents, which are relevant entities in developing and operating school education curricula. The objectives of this study were to identi...

    The present study deaBt with the issue concerning the rights & its limitations of the state, schooBs, teachers and parents, which are relevant entities in developing and operating school education curricula. The objectives of this study were to identify problems with the
    current development and operation of school education curricula, and the causes of the problems based on historical and legal backgrounds. With regard to these purposes, three research problems to be discussed were defined as follows.
    First, this study examined the issue of justness of the concept of public education in contemporary society through the histoncal background and developmental process of public education, which are the bases of current development and operation of school education curricula. Second, this study considered the constitutiona]ity of educational ideas on the right of education defined in the constitution and other education-related laws and regulations, and based on the findings, examined the legality of education curriculum doveLopment and operation policies conducted by the state. Third, based on the discussion above, this study examined specifically the right of schools, teachers, parents and students, which are relevant entities in developing and operating school education curricula in each school, as wel] as the relationships among the entities. As a result of this study based on the historical and legal background of public educatien to solve these research problems, the following conclusions were drawn.
    Public education started as family-based private education fell into the national system as the state was established. In the process the state that tool over the dominant position in education from parents strengthened ideological Instruction for the political and economical interest of the ruling group. The current 7th Education Curriculum is a representative example that shows clearly the intention to propagate neo-liberalism. Thus the government's exclusive right on education lost its justness. As for legal issue, the national po]icies related to the current development and operation of school education curricula are contrary to the basic idea of securing people's right to education specified in the Constitution, and provisilons related to school education curricula in subordinate education-related lalvs and regulations are likely to violate the Constitution.
    In conclusion, the government's policies on the development and operation of school education curricula lack the basis of justness and legality. Thus, it is required to reconsider the government's exclusive development and operation of school education curricula and reestablish the statuses of education entities so that a group of educational experts lead the development and operation, and the state, schools, parents and students participate in it.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • II. 공교육 발전 과정에서의 교육권 = 3
    • 1. 공교육의 태동 = 3
    • 2. 자본주의 발달과 공교육 = 5
    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • II. 공교육 발전 과정에서의 교육권 = 3
    • 1. 공교육의 태동 = 3
    • 2. 자본주의 발달과 공교육 = 5
    • 3. 복지 국가와 공교육 = 7
    • 4. 신자유주의와 공교육 = 10
    • III. 교육 과정 개발 운영 권한의 법적 근거 = 17
    • 1. 교육 과정에 대한 권한의 법적 근거 = 17
    • 2. 교육 과정에 대한 국가의 권한 = 22
    • IV. 교육 과정에 대한 학교 내 주체들의 권한 = 29
    • 1. 학교(장)의 권한 = 29
    • 2. 교사의 권한 = 35
    • 3. 부모의 권한 = 42
    • 4. 학생의 권한 = 49
    • V. 결론 = 56
    • 참고문헌 = 60
    • 영문초록 = 63
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼