RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      英才 靑少年의 個人的 特性과 完璧主義 性向間의 關係

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8947517

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        서울 : 建國大學校, 2003

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문(박사) -- 건국대학교 대학원 , 교육학과 교육심리전공 , 2003.2

      • 발행연도

        2003

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • 주제어
      • KDC

        376.073 판사항(4)

      • DDC

        373.019 판사항(21)

      • 발행국(도시)

        서울

      • 기타서명

        Relationships between personal traits and perfectionism of the gifted adolescents

      • 형태사항

        ii, 144p. : 삽도 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        권말에 부록 수록
        참고문헌 : p.108-132

      • 소장기관
        • 건국대학교 상허기념도서관 소장기관정보
        • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
        • 세종대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research aims to bring light on the relationships between personal traits and perfectionism of gifted Adolescents.
      The following questions for the research were formulated based on the objective of the study.
      First, is there any difference between higher perfectionism-
      oriented group and lower perfectionism-oriented group in the relationship between perfectionism and personal traits variables of gifted Adolescents?
      Second, does the perfectionism of gifted Adolescents get different by grade or sex?
      Third, how do personal traits variables contribute to discriminate disposition of perfectionism in gifted Adolescents?
      1) How much can personal traits variables be accurate to distinguish and expect perfectionist groups?
      2) Which personal traits variables are positive and which are negative in classification of disposition of perfectionism?
      3) Specially, which personal traits variables are more contributive in discrimininating disposition of perfectionism?
      To get an answer, we sampled 417 students who study in three science high schools in the Metropolitan area. After testing the dispositions of their perfectionism,
      we selected 67 students over M+1 SD with other 67 students underM-1SD. And we titled the former-higher perfectionism-
      oriented group'and the latter-lower perfectionism-oriented group'.
      Personal Traits Scale(PTS) developed by Shin, Hyoun Sook was used to verify the questions provided in the study statistically. On the other hand, Multidimentional Perfectionism Scale(MPS)developed by Hewitt and Flett(1991) in Canada, which was translated into Korean by Han, Ki Yeon(1993) was used to estimate disposition of perfectionism.
      We compiled statistics on the scales of MPS and PTS, using SPSS for window 10.0. And we tried Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and t-test as a statistical analysis method to verify subject 1 and subject 2 of the study, and tried discriminant function analysis to verify subject 3.
      The results of the study are as follows :
      First, in case of higher perfectionism-oriented group(M+1SD), there were more variables which are closer to the disposition of perfectionism than others are, comparing with lower perfectionism-oriented group while there was no variable that is closer to the disposition of perfectionism than other variables are. Especially, some variables such as self esteem( .72, p< .01), self efficacy( .74, p< .01), obsessions compulsions neuroses( -.81, p< .01) and self trust( .73, p< .01) show as those variables are more influential to the disposition of perfectionism.
      Second, there was no significant difference found in the dispositions of perfectionism by grade.
      Third, boys' groups are inclined to show higher socially-prescribed perfectionism rather than self-oriented perfectionism and others-oriented perfectionism comparing with girls' groups(t= 2.52, p< .05). However, girls' groups are inclined to show higher self-oriented perfectionism than socially-prescribed perfectionism and others-oriented perfectionism when compared with boys' groups(t= 2.48, p< .05).
      Fourth, in classifying and predicting dispositions of perfectionism with 18 personal traits variables, accuracy of classification and prediction is 88.72%, which is 38.72% higher than 50%, existed in accurate percentage.
      Fifth, thirteen variables such as self-esteem, self-trust, self-
      efficacy, competition, achieve movement, persistence, commitment, academic achievement, rational thinking, psychological well-being, moral judgement, psychological environment and degree of school life adjustment effect positively while five variables such as obsession, interpersonal relationship, stress, anxiety and depress do in negative ways in dividing dispositions of the perfectionism by standardized canonical discriminant functional coefficient.
      Sixth, the significant traits variables in discriminant perfectionism are obsession (r=-.52, p< .001), self esteem(r=.37, p< .01), self trust(r=.35, p< .01) and self efficacy(r=.34, p< .01) and so on.
      And self-oriented groups seem self-esteem(r= .82, p< .001), self-trust(r= .84, p< .001), self-efficacy(r= .81, p< .001) and achieve movement(r= .85, p< .001) which is one of the characteristic factors. However, disposition of socially prescribed perfectionism is obsessive compulsion(r= -.87, p< .001) while that of other-oriented perfectionism is competitive spirit(r= .73, p< .001). Both are characteristic factors.
      As a result of the study, we could come to the conclusion as below:
      First, the dispositions of perfectionism in gifted adolescents get different by personal traits variables, specially it relates closer to character factors or self concept than to perceptional or physical factors.
      Second, generally speaking, boys are inclined to be social-oriented perfectionist than girls while girls are inclined to be self-oriented perfectionist.
      Third, we can say, the most contributive traits variables in discriminating the disposition of perfectionism in gifted adolescents are obsession variable and patience variable.
      Our suggestions based on the above the conclusion are as follows:
      First, we need to compare the assumptions through path analysis concerning whether some traits variables effect on the disposition of perfectionism directly or indirectly, with results of this study to enlarge and develop the study.
      Second, we have a limit to estimate the dispositions of the perfectionism of human with perfectionism scales which have been studied so far. In other words, there can be differences depending on who actually estimate the disposition of perfectionism since the test paper to estimate perfectionism is self-reporting examination paper.
      Therefore, we need to develop testing tools such as observation and interview people who are concerned.
      Third, we think that consequent studies which are helpful for development of counseling and personality program are required with a study that would effect on the dispositions of the perfectionism of gifted students positively. To make it, we have to enlarge and develop the study on positive and negative functions of perfectionism of gifted adolescents.

      번역하기

      This research aims to bring light on the relationships between personal traits and perfectionism of gifted Adolescents. The following questions for the research were formulated based on the objective of the study. First, is there any difference be...

      This research aims to bring light on the relationships between personal traits and perfectionism of gifted Adolescents.
      The following questions for the research were formulated based on the objective of the study.
      First, is there any difference between higher perfectionism-
      oriented group and lower perfectionism-oriented group in the relationship between perfectionism and personal traits variables of gifted Adolescents?
      Second, does the perfectionism of gifted Adolescents get different by grade or sex?
      Third, how do personal traits variables contribute to discriminate disposition of perfectionism in gifted Adolescents?
      1) How much can personal traits variables be accurate to distinguish and expect perfectionist groups?
      2) Which personal traits variables are positive and which are negative in classification of disposition of perfectionism?
      3) Specially, which personal traits variables are more contributive in discrimininating disposition of perfectionism?
      To get an answer, we sampled 417 students who study in three science high schools in the Metropolitan area. After testing the dispositions of their perfectionism,
      we selected 67 students over M+1 SD with other 67 students underM-1SD. And we titled the former-higher perfectionism-
      oriented group'and the latter-lower perfectionism-oriented group'.
      Personal Traits Scale(PTS) developed by Shin, Hyoun Sook was used to verify the questions provided in the study statistically. On the other hand, Multidimentional Perfectionism Scale(MPS)developed by Hewitt and Flett(1991) in Canada, which was translated into Korean by Han, Ki Yeon(1993) was used to estimate disposition of perfectionism.
      We compiled statistics on the scales of MPS and PTS, using SPSS for window 10.0. And we tried Pearson product moment correlation coefficient and t-test as a statistical analysis method to verify subject 1 and subject 2 of the study, and tried discriminant function analysis to verify subject 3.
      The results of the study are as follows :
      First, in case of higher perfectionism-oriented group(M+1SD), there were more variables which are closer to the disposition of perfectionism than others are, comparing with lower perfectionism-oriented group while there was no variable that is closer to the disposition of perfectionism than other variables are. Especially, some variables such as self esteem( .72, p< .01), self efficacy( .74, p< .01), obsessions compulsions neuroses( -.81, p< .01) and self trust( .73, p< .01) show as those variables are more influential to the disposition of perfectionism.
      Second, there was no significant difference found in the dispositions of perfectionism by grade.
      Third, boys' groups are inclined to show higher socially-prescribed perfectionism rather than self-oriented perfectionism and others-oriented perfectionism comparing with girls' groups(t= 2.52, p< .05). However, girls' groups are inclined to show higher self-oriented perfectionism than socially-prescribed perfectionism and others-oriented perfectionism when compared with boys' groups(t= 2.48, p< .05).
      Fourth, in classifying and predicting dispositions of perfectionism with 18 personal traits variables, accuracy of classification and prediction is 88.72%, which is 38.72% higher than 50%, existed in accurate percentage.
      Fifth, thirteen variables such as self-esteem, self-trust, self-
      efficacy, competition, achieve movement, persistence, commitment, academic achievement, rational thinking, psychological well-being, moral judgement, psychological environment and degree of school life adjustment effect positively while five variables such as obsession, interpersonal relationship, stress, anxiety and depress do in negative ways in dividing dispositions of the perfectionism by standardized canonical discriminant functional coefficient.
      Sixth, the significant traits variables in discriminant perfectionism are obsession (r=-.52, p< .001), self esteem(r=.37, p< .01), self trust(r=.35, p< .01) and self efficacy(r=.34, p< .01) and so on.
      And self-oriented groups seem self-esteem(r= .82, p< .001), self-trust(r= .84, p< .001), self-efficacy(r= .81, p< .001) and achieve movement(r= .85, p< .001) which is one of the characteristic factors. However, disposition of socially prescribed perfectionism is obsessive compulsion(r= -.87, p< .001) while that of other-oriented perfectionism is competitive spirit(r= .73, p< .001). Both are characteristic factors.
      As a result of the study, we could come to the conclusion as below:
      First, the dispositions of perfectionism in gifted adolescents get different by personal traits variables, specially it relates closer to character factors or self concept than to perceptional or physical factors.
      Second, generally speaking, boys are inclined to be social-oriented perfectionist than girls while girls are inclined to be self-oriented perfectionist.
      Third, we can say, the most contributive traits variables in discriminating the disposition of perfectionism in gifted adolescents are obsession variable and patience variable.
      Our suggestions based on the above the conclusion are as follows:
      First, we need to compare the assumptions through path analysis concerning whether some traits variables effect on the disposition of perfectionism directly or indirectly, with results of this study to enlarge and develop the study.
      Second, we have a limit to estimate the dispositions of the perfectionism of human with perfectionism scales which have been studied so far. In other words, there can be differences depending on who actually estimate the disposition of perfectionism since the test paper to estimate perfectionism is self-reporting examination paper.
      Therefore, we need to develop testing tools such as observation and interview people who are concerned.
      Third, we think that consequent studies which are helpful for development of counseling and personality program are required with a study that would effect on the dispositions of the perfectionism of gifted students positively. To make it, we have to enlarge and develop the study on positive and negative functions of perfectionism of gifted adolescents.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구목적 및 문제 = 5
      • C. 용어의 정의 = 6
      • 목차
      • I. 서론 = 1
      • A. 연구의 필요성 = 1
      • B. 연구목적 및 문제 = 5
      • C. 용어의 정의 = 6
      • D. 연구의 제한점 = 7
      • II. 이론적 배경 = 9
      • A. 영재의 개념 및 특성 = 9
      • B. 개인적 특성 = 26
      • C. 완벽주의 = 36
      • D. 선행연구의 고찰 = 55
      • III. 연구의 방법 = 75
      • A. 연구의 대상 = 75
      • B. 연구의 도구 = 76
      • C. 연구의 절차 = 85
      • D. 자료의 처리 = 86
      • IV. 결과해석 및 논의 = 87
      • A. 결과해석 = 87
      • B. 논의 = 101
      • V. 요약 및 결론 = 103
      • A. 요약 = 103
      • B. 결론 = 106
      • C. 제언 = 106
      • 참고문헌 = 108
      • Abstract = 133
      • 부록 = 138
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼