地方自治團體 住民參與 影響要因에 관한 硏究 : 慶尙南道 泗川市를 中心으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The local administration had faced dramatical change as a turning point with the local election which held on 27th June, 1995. Through the election, more complete local autonomy was begin to perform by being elected governors by citizens. By emerging of elected-governors, local administration was being to change with new and fresh appearance. As a matter of fact, the most important point of localization era are the degree of local development and citizen participation into the autonomy administration.
The citizen participation onto the major decision making process in local government provides the benefits such as the insurance of democracy in autonomy administration and consolidation of community. The aim of local autonomy has made it possible for citizen to be involved in the local administrative participation. It has been proposed that local autonomy helps citizens to easily solve any problems or conflicts that they may have with the local government. The citizen participation, however, is incomplete and the consciousness of participation is insufficient as well.
This study focused on the analysis on both determinants and responsiveness aspects of citizen participation to accomplish the purpose of this study. In performing this study, citizen participation system and the awareness on participation were examined through the questionnaire within sample areas, Sa-Chon, Kyoung-Nam. The key aims of this study is to explore factors that effect on the citizen participation.
For this study's validity, I analyzed the data on survey through the SPSSWIN program. To be concrete, Frequency analysis was used to get the general perception of person answered. To prevent the errors of the questionnaire, Reliability test was used to test the variables. t-test, ANOVA, multiple-regression analysis were used to test hypothesis set.
The major findings of this research are as follow :
1) The level of citizen participation in local government is relatively low, So local government should concrete relationship with private sector and utilize positively voluntary activities.
2) From the analysis of variance, this study found that level of citizen participation in local government is statistically different by sex, age, occupation.
3) The result of regression analysis shows that the determinant of citizen participation is mass-media, public official's honesty, administrative information service, trust in public official. So, local government should voluntarily open all administrative information to the public so that the average citizens can timely know that information related to themselves to make a better community and to draw voluntary participation. The right of fair participation should be given to all average citizens. If not, the representation should be fully considered in that case.
This study tried to find out the level of citizen participation in local government, but it still has some limitations. I believe that we need to discuss and develop more effective and open systems to deal with citizen participation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 의의와 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구의 범위와 방법 = 3
• 제2장 연구의 이론적 배경 = 6
• 제1절 지방자치의 개념과 의미 = 6
• 1. 지방자치의 개념 = 6
• 2. 지방자치의 의미 = 8
• 1) 정치적 의미 = 9
• 2) 행정적 의미 = 10
• 3) 경제적 의미 = 11
• 4) 사회문화적 의미 = 12
• 제2절 지방자치와 주민참여의 필요성 = 13
• 1. 지방자치의 구성요소 = 13
• 2. 주민참여의 개념 = 15
• 3. 주민참여의 의의와 필요성 = 17
• 1) 주민참여의 의의 = 18
• 2) 주민참여의 필요성 = 19
• 4. 지방자치에 있어서의 주민의 역할 = 21
• 1) 행정적 측면의 역할 = 22
• 2) 정치적 측면의 역할 = 24
• 제3절 주민참여의 여건과 통로 = 26
• 1. 주민참여에 대한 법률적 근거 = 26
• 1) 주민참여의 헌법적 근거 = 26
• 2) 주민의 참여를 규정한 법률 = 27
• 3) 조례에 의한 주민참여제도 = 31
• 2. 주민참여의 여건(환경) = 32
• 1) 주민의 의식구조 = 32
• 2) 공무원의 행태 = 33
• 3) 행정구조와 기능 = 34
• 4) 정보의 공개 = 35
• 3. 주민참여의 채널(통로) = 35
• 1) 행정자문위원회 = 36
• 2) 주민투표 = 36
• 3) 반상회 및 주민조직 = 37
• 4) 주민발의제 = 38
• 5) 주민감사청구제 = 38
• 6) 주민주도적 접촉: 민원제출, 제안제도, 인터넷주민참여 = 39
• 7) 자원봉사 = 40
• 8) 공청회 = 41
• 9) 여론모니터제도 = 41
• 10) 행정예고제 = 41
• 11) 여론설문제도 = 42
• 12) 기관장과 주민과의 대화 = 42
• 제4절 주민참여의 대응성 = 42
• 1. 주민참여에 대한 행정의 대응성 = 42
• 2. 관료적 대응성 모델 = 46
• 제3장 연구의 조사설계 = 50
• 제1절 경험적 연구를 위한 분석틀 및 가설설정 = 50
• 1. 분석틀의 설정 = 50
• 2. 가설설정 = 53
• 제2절 설문지 구성 = 55
• 제3절 설문조사방법과 대상 = 57
• 제4장 조사결과의 논의 및 분석 = 58
• 제1절 표본의 특성 = 58
• 제2절 척도구성을 위한 신뢰도 분석 = 59
• 제3절 조사결과의 분석 = 60
• 1. 주민참여의 여건(영향요인) 분석 = 60
• 1) 주민의식에 대한 빈도분석 = 60
• 2) 공무원 행태에 대한 빈도분석 = 65
• 3) 정보공개정도 빈도분석 = 68
• 2. 주민참여도 분석 = 70
• 1) 주민참여도 빈도분석 = 70
• 2) 주민참여도 분산분석 = 71
• 3) 주민참여도 상관관계분석 = 73
• 4) 주민참여도 다중회귀분석 = 74
• 제5장 요약 및 결론 = 76
• 참고문헌 = 80
• 설문조사서 = 83
• ABSTRACT = 86