RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    조직시민행동, 조직몰입에 대한 지각된 조직적 지원의 선행요인과 매개효과에 관한 연구 = Antecedents of Perceived Organizational Support, and it's Mediating Effect on Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Organizational Commitment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8874973

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was fourfold : (1) to examine the construct validation of the two-dimensional perceived organizational support scale, (2) to examine the effects of antecedents such as organizational justice, communication satisfaction, affectivity and locus of control on perceived organizational support, (3) to examine the effects of perceived organizational support on consequences such as organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, (4) and to examine the effect of perceived organizational support as a mediator in the relationship between antecedents and consequences.
    A research model was established according to the literature reviews in the field of perceived organizational support (Eisenberger et al, 1986; Shore & Wayne, 1993; Wayne et al, 1997).
    For two months, questionnaire survey was administered by the researcher in 7 companies. Out of 410 responses, only 364 were used as the final set of data for analysis.
    Research findings can be summarized as follows:
    ① The construct validation of the two-dimensional perceived organizational support scale.
    In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the discriminant validity between emotional support and instrumental support. The results of the study showed the SPOS(survey of perceived organizational support) as a two-dimensional scale.
    ② The relationship between antecedents and perceived organizational support.
    The results of the study showed that distributive justice, procedural justice and communication satisfaction with top management have a positive effect on the two dimensions of perceived organizational support. However, communication satisfaction with supervisor had a positive effect on emotional support, and communication satisfaction with co-worker had a positive effect on instrumental support.
    Positive affectivity did not have any significant effect on any of organizational support variables. Negative affectivity had a negative effect on instrumental support only. Locus of control had a positive effect on the two components of perceived organizational support.
    ③ The relationship between perceived organizational support and consequences.
    Emotional support had a positive effect on loyalty behavior, self-development behavior, affective commitment and continuous commitment. Instrumental support had a positive effect on loyalty behavior, altruistic behavior, conscientious behavior and affective commitment.
    ④ Mediating effect of perceived organizational support in the relationship between antecedents and consequences.
    Organizational support either partially or completely mediated 72 relationships of the 96 relationships between antecedents and consequences. Of these mediated relationships, 18 represent full mediation and 64, partial mediation.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was fourfold : (1) to examine the construct validation of the two-dimensional perceived organizational support scale, (2) to examine the effects of antecedents such as organizational justice, communication satisfaction, affec...

    The purpose of this study was fourfold : (1) to examine the construct validation of the two-dimensional perceived organizational support scale, (2) to examine the effects of antecedents such as organizational justice, communication satisfaction, affectivity and locus of control on perceived organizational support, (3) to examine the effects of perceived organizational support on consequences such as organizational commitment, organizational citizenship behavior, (4) and to examine the effect of perceived organizational support as a mediator in the relationship between antecedents and consequences.
    A research model was established according to the literature reviews in the field of perceived organizational support (Eisenberger et al, 1986; Shore & Wayne, 1993; Wayne et al, 1997).
    For two months, questionnaire survey was administered by the researcher in 7 companies. Out of 410 responses, only 364 were used as the final set of data for analysis.
    Research findings can be summarized as follows:
    ① The construct validation of the two-dimensional perceived organizational support scale.
    In this study, confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the discriminant validity between emotional support and instrumental support. The results of the study showed the SPOS(survey of perceived organizational support) as a two-dimensional scale.
    ② The relationship between antecedents and perceived organizational support.
    The results of the study showed that distributive justice, procedural justice and communication satisfaction with top management have a positive effect on the two dimensions of perceived organizational support. However, communication satisfaction with supervisor had a positive effect on emotional support, and communication satisfaction with co-worker had a positive effect on instrumental support.
    Positive affectivity did not have any significant effect on any of organizational support variables. Negative affectivity had a negative effect on instrumental support only. Locus of control had a positive effect on the two components of perceived organizational support.
    ③ The relationship between perceived organizational support and consequences.
    Emotional support had a positive effect on loyalty behavior, self-development behavior, affective commitment and continuous commitment. Instrumental support had a positive effect on loyalty behavior, altruistic behavior, conscientious behavior and affective commitment.
    ④ Mediating effect of perceived organizational support in the relationship between antecedents and consequences.
    Organizational support either partially or completely mediated 72 relationships of the 96 relationships between antecedents and consequences. Of these mediated relationships, 18 represent full mediation and 64, partial mediation.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • <제목 차례> = i
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제제기 및 연구목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 방법 및 구성 = 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 9
    • <제목 차례> = i
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 문제제기 및 연구목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 방법 및 구성 = 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 9
    • 제1절 지각된 조직적 지원 = 9
    • 1. 지각된 조직적 지원의 개념 = 9
    • 2. 지각된 조직적 지원의 측정차원 = 11
    • 3. 지각된 조직적 지원에 대한 기존 연구의 개관 = 18
    • 4. 지각된 조직적 지원의 유사개념들 = 25
    • 제2절 지각된 조직적 지원의 선행변수 = 32
    • 1. 조직공정성 = 32
    • 2. 의사소통만족 = 35
    • 3. 정서 = 39
    • 4. 통제의 위치 = 41
    • 제3절 지각된 조직적 지원의 결과변수 = 43
    • 1. 조직시민행동 = 43
    • 2. 조직몰입 = 49
    • 제4절 지각된 조직적 지원의 매개역할 = 54
    • 1. 공정성과 결과변수와의 관계에 있어서 POS의 매개역할 = 55
    • 2. 의사소통만족과 결과변수와의 관계에 있어서 POS의 매개역할. = 57
    • 3. 정서, 통제의 위치와 결과변수와의 관계에 있어서 POS의 매개역할 = 57
    • 제3장 연구모형 및 가설의 설정 = 59
    • 제1절 연구모형 = 59
    • 제2절 가설설정 = 63
    • 1. 공정성과 지각된 조직적 지원 = 63
    • 2. 의사소통만족과 지각된 조직적 지원 = 65
    • 3. 정서와 지각된 조직적 지원 = 66
    • 4. 통제의 위치와 지각된 조직적 지원 = 68
    • 5. 지각된 조직적 지원과 조직시민행동 = 69
    • 6. 지각된 조직적 지원과 조직몰입 = 71
    • 7. 지각된 조직적 지원의 매개역할 = 72
    • 제4장 연구조사의 설계 = 75
    • 제1절 연구대상 = 75
    • 제2절 변수의 조작적 정의 및 측정 척도 = 77
    • 1. 조직특성 변수 = 77
    • 2. 개인특성 변수 = 78
    • 3. 지각된 조직적 지원 = 79
    • 4. 결과변수 = 80
    • 5. 설문지의 구성 = 82
    • 제3절 분석방법 = 83
    • 제5장 연구분석결과 86
    • 제1절 타당성 및 신뢰성 검증 = 86
    • 1. 연구변수의 타탕성 = 86
    • 2. 연구변수의 신뢰성 = 94
    • 제2절 변수간의 상관관계 = 95
    • 제3절 가설검증 = 98
    • 1. 선행변수와 지각된 조직적 지원과의 관계 = 98
    • 2. 지각된 조직적 지원과 결과변수와의 관계 = 104
    • 3. 지각된 조직적 지원의 매개역할 검증 = 111
    • 제6장 요약 및 결론 = 128
    • 제1절 연구결과의 요약 = 128
    • 제2절 연구의 시사점 = 132
    • 제3절 연구의 한계점 및 미래 연구방향 = 135
    • 참고문헌 = 138
    • <부록> = 156
    • = 163
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼