RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    집단토의 활동이 유아의 친사회적 행동에 미치는 영향 = A Study on the Effects of Group Discussion on the Prosocial Development of Young Children

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8872442

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of group discussion on the prosocial development of young children. To achieve this purpose, 122 kindergarten children aged four or five were sampled and randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental treatment were treated for eight weeks to experimental group. And the 'Prosocail Behavior Test' were administered to the children of experimental group and the control group.
    The collected data were analyzed by t-test for the pre-test and post-test to compare between experimental group and the control group.
    The findings of this study were as follows:
    1. There were no statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(120)=1.21, p>.05]. But there were statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in the post-test personal emotion control skills[t(120)=5.07, p<.01], inter-relationship skills[t(120)=3.18, p<.01], kindergarten adjustment skills[t(120)=3.33, p<.01], and total prosocial behavior scores[t(120)=5.10, p<.01]. It showed that the scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group. This result means that the prosocial behavior increased by group discussion.
    2. There were statistically significant differences between the children of four years and five years of experimental group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=5.24, p<.01]. It showed that the scores of the 5 years of age were significantly higher than that of the four years of age. But there were no statistically significant differences between the children of four years and five years of experimental group in the post-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=0.29, p>.05]. This result means that the group discussion were more effective to the prosocial behavior of four years of age.
    3. There were no statistically significant differences between the boys and girls of experimental group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=1.64, p>.05]. And, also there were no statistically significant differences between the boys and girls of experimental group in the post-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=0.62, p>.05]. This result means that the group discussion were equally effective to the prosocial behavior of girls and boys.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of group discussion on the prosocial development of young children. To achieve this purpose, 122 kindergarten children aged four or five were sampled and randomly assigned to the experimental gr...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of group discussion on the prosocial development of young children. To achieve this purpose, 122 kindergarten children aged four or five were sampled and randomly assigned to the experimental group and the control group. The experimental treatment were treated for eight weeks to experimental group. And the 'Prosocail Behavior Test' were administered to the children of experimental group and the control group.
    The collected data were analyzed by t-test for the pre-test and post-test to compare between experimental group and the control group.
    The findings of this study were as follows:
    1. There were no statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(120)=1.21, p>.05]. But there were statistically significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in the post-test personal emotion control skills[t(120)=5.07, p<.01], inter-relationship skills[t(120)=3.18, p<.01], kindergarten adjustment skills[t(120)=3.33, p<.01], and total prosocial behavior scores[t(120)=5.10, p<.01]. It showed that the scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than that of the control group. This result means that the prosocial behavior increased by group discussion.
    2. There were statistically significant differences between the children of four years and five years of experimental group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=5.24, p<.01]. It showed that the scores of the 5 years of age were significantly higher than that of the four years of age. But there were no statistically significant differences between the children of four years and five years of experimental group in the post-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=0.29, p>.05]. This result means that the group discussion were more effective to the prosocial behavior of four years of age.
    3. There were no statistically significant differences between the boys and girls of experimental group in the pre-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=1.64, p>.05]. And, also there were no statistically significant differences between the boys and girls of experimental group in the post-test prosocial behavior scores[t(60)=0.62, p>.05]. This result means that the group discussion were equally effective to the prosocial behavior of girls and boys.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 영문초록
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 용어의 정의 = 3
    • 목차
    • 영문초록
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 용어의 정의 = 3
    • 3. 연구의 제한점 = 4
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 5
    • 1. 집단토의학습 = 5
    • 2. 유아의 친사회적 행동 = 12
    • 3. 선행연구 고찰 = 17
    • III. 연구 문제 및 가설 = 20
    • IV. 연구 방법 = 22
    • 1. 연구대상과 기간 = 22
    • 2. 측정도구 = 23
    • 3. 실험설계 및 절차 = 25
    • 4. 자료분석방법 = 30
    • V. 결과해석 및 논의 = 31
    • VI. 요약 및 결론 = 42
    • 1. 요약 = 42
    • 2. 결론 = 44
    • 참고문헌 = 46
    • 부록 = 51
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼