부부간의 갈등표출 방법에 관한 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

本 硏究는 夫婦間의 葛藤을 理解하고, 夫婦間의 葛藤이 어떤 原因에 의해 생겨나며, 葛藤을 어떤 方法으로 表出하고 있으며, 夫婦間의 葛藤表出方法과 夫婦間意思疏通樣式과는 相關이 있는지 알아보고 두 關係에 대한 실증적 자료를 제공하고자 한다.
本 硏究에서 다루려는 硏究問題는 다음과 같다.
1. 結婚生活에서 夫婦葛藤은 어떤 原因에 의해 발생하는가?
2. 夫婦葛藤表出方法은 性別, 敎育程度, 職業, 所得, 結婚年齡, 宗敎의 有·無에 따라 差異를 보이는가?
3. 意思疏通樣式의 使用程度는 男·女에 따라 차이를 보이는가?
4. 夫婦間의 葛藤表出方法과 意思疏通統樣式과는 相關이 있는가?
이 硏究를 위해 3가지 척도로 302명( 남138, 여 164 : 국민학교 4개교, 중학교 2개교, 고등학교 2개교의 부모님들 )에게 說問을 통해 資料를 수집하였다.
첫째도구는 先行硏究를 기초로, 둘째도구는 Murray A. Straus 의 Conflict Tactices Scales, 세째도구는 James L. Hawkins의 意思疏通樣式의 硏究를 기초로한 元曉鍾 硏究를 이용하였다.
資料分析은 빈도, 백분율, 평균을 구한후 F-Test를 하여 유의도를 검증했고, Pearson의 적률 상관계수를 구하였다.
硏究結果는 다음과 같다.
1. 주요 갈등의 原因은 男便과 婦人의 경우만을 보았다.
男便은 知的·興味差異, 子女敎育및 養育, 宗敎, 經濟問題, 健康, 生活態度, 家族關係, 性格, 愛情의 順이다.
婦人은 知的.興味差異, 子女敎育및 養育, 宗敎, 健康, 家族關係, 經濟問題, 生活態度, 性格, 愛情의 順이다.
이것은 1970年代 말과 1980年代 초와 비교해볼때 많은 변화가 있었다. 이것은 아마도 가정의 경제수준의 향상으로 보다 인간다운 삶을 추구하며 자신의 정신적, 정서적 생활에 많은 가치를 두게 되었기 때문이 아닌가 생각한다.
2. 夫婦葛藤表出方法은 말다툼, 폭력에서 교육정도( P<.05, P<.001)와 結婚年齡( P<.05, P<.05)이 有意한 差異를 보였고, 다른 변인과는 有意한 差異를 보이지 않았다.
3. 夫婦間의 意思疏通樣式은 性別에 따라 遮斷型, 抑制型, 親熟型에서 有意한 差異를 보였다.
4. 夫婦葛藤表出方法과 夫婦間意思疏通樣式과의 相關關係는 남편(P<.05), 婦人(P<.05, P<.01) 모두 높은 관계를 보였다.
이와같은 硏究結果로 健全한 家族關係를 위해 開放的 意思疏通 類型과 理性的 葛藤表出方法이 必要함을 알수 있다.
또한 어린시절부터 이 開放的 意思疏通 類型과 理性的 葛藤表出方法에 대한 敎育이 필요하다.
앞으로 이 硏究를 토대로 夫婦間의 葛藤表出方法과 意思疏通樣式에 따른 夫婦間의 適應에 대한 硏究도 이루어졌으면 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to investigate what kinds of issues are involved in conflicts between husbands and wives, what are the ways of expression in marital conflict in marital conflict situation, which factors among the variables (sex, educational level, husbands occupation, family income, the age of marriage, religion) have effect on the way of expression in the marital conflict and the marital communication style.
Questions to be considered in the study are as follows;
1. What are major conflict areas in married life?
2. How do independent variables influence on the way of expression in marital conflict.
3. Is there any gender difference in the marital communication style?
4. Is there any relationship between the way of the expression of marital conflict and the marital communication style. For this study, three instruments were administered to 302 subjects (138 males, 164 females) who were mothers and fathers of the students attending 4 elementary schools, 2 middle schools and 2 high schools located in Seoul. The first instrument was a modified version of 'The Marital Conflict Tactics Scale' which was developed by Straus and the third instrument was Hyo Jong Won's study based on the marital communication style by Power and Hawkins.
Theoretical way of expression for marital conflict are scale of expression was ranked as 'Reasoning', 'Verbal Aggression' and 'Violence' and Marital Communication Style are 'Conventional', 'Controlling', 'Speculation' and 'Contactful'.
Statistical Method used to analyze the data was frequencies, percentile, mean, one-way ANOVA and Pearson's correlation.
The major result of this study are as follows:
1. Major conflict areas in marital life are ranked as follows. In husbands, ranked are; difference of knowledge and interest, children's breeding and education, religion, economic problem, health, manner of life, family relationship, difference of character and love.
In wives, ranked are; difference of knowledge and interest, children's breeding and education, religion, health, family relationship, economic problem, manner of life, difference of character and love.
There were a great deal of changes in variables in the 80s as compared with that of the late the 70s. This change may have come from the improvement of financial status that make people to place importance of life in their spiritual and emotional life rather than in wealth.
2. The two variables, degree of education (p<.05, p<.001) age of marriage (p<.05, p<.05) made significant difference in 'Verbal Aggression', 'Violence' in the way of expression in the marital conflict, while other variables didn't make much difference in the way of expression in marital conflict. People in the lower education level tends to use' Verbal Aggression', 'Violence' more than people in the higher education level.
Age of marriage under 24 group tend to use 'Verbal Aggression', 'Violence' more often than the other 2 groups.
3. Sex makes significant difference in 'Conventional', 'Controlling' and 'Controlling' and Contactful' style in the degree of marital communication style.
Husbands employ more often' Conventional' style than wives, and wives employ more often 'Controlling' and 'Contactful' style than husbands. Maybe the difference come from men's socialization.
4. There is a significant positive correlation between the way of expression in marital conflict and the marital communication style.
Among 'Controlling' type husbands showed correlation with 'Verbal Aggression', 'Violence'. 'Speculation' and among analytic type, with 'Reasoning,' while wives showed in the former type 'Reasoning', 'Verbal Aggression' and among the latter, wives had correlation between 'Reasoning' and 'Verbal Aggression.'
As a result of this study, the writer advocates, the open communication and 'Reasoning' which is one of the ways to expose marital conflict for the healthy family relationship. The researcher believes that the open communication and 'Reasoning' need to be taught from the childhood.
The writer would suggest that further studies on the Marital Adjustment over the way of expression in marital conflict and the marital communication style need to be conducted.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次
• 論文要約 = I
• I. 序論 = 1
• 1. 問題의 提起 = 1
• 2. 硏究의 制限點 = 4
• 3. 用語의 定議 = 5
• II. 理論的 背景 = 6
• 1. 夫妻葛?의 槪念 및 유발原因 = 6
• 2. 葛藤이 夫妻關係의 미치는 영향 = 12
• 3. 夫妻葛藤表出方法 = 14
• 4. 意思疏通의 定義 및 夫妻間 意思疏通樣式 = 15
• 5. 意思疏通이 夫妻關係에 미치는 영향 = 22
• III. 硏究問題 = 25
• 1. 硏究問題 = 25
• 2. 硏究模型 = 25
• IV. 연구방법 = 27
• 1. 調査道具 = 27
• 2. 硏究對象 및 節次 = 29
• 3. 資料分析 = 33
• V. 結果 및 解釋 = 35
• VI. 結論 및 提言 = 48
• 參考文獻 = 52
• 英文抄錄 = 56
• 附錄 = 60