RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    공동주택 재건축 공사계약체결방식 의사결정모델에 관한 연구 = (A) study on the decision making model for reconstruction contract method

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8706013

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In the past, the reconstruction contract method was decided by the size of the business profit that anticipated from the basic economic analysis of the project. If the business profit was expected high, construction cost-oriented contract system had been recommended and if the profit was expected low, equity-oriented contract system was the way to run the business. But, any system without a close consideration on varying circumstances related to reconstruction methods and clients' ability might lead the whole business to discord of participators, business schedule delay, and cost rise.
    The following study engaged the inquiry by the exploratory research and interviews with specialists to figure out the factors needed for choosing a reconstruction method, and then applied AHP methodology to the found factors to reconstruct the decision making model.
    The decision making model for reconstruction contract method consists of 4 levels and the second level includes 'project' and 'participator'. Cost, business schedule, quality are the sub-level factors for the project, and 'client' and 'constructor' are the factors that will be evaluated for the participator.
    The followings are results and contribution of the study.
    1. The study examined the contract methods established by Ministry of Construction and Transportation for both Construction cost-oriented contract system and Equity-oriented contract system in every clause.
    2. The study drew an appraisal standard for the reconstruction contract method that can satisfy not only return profit but also clients and project.
    3. The study figured out the correlation and importance of the evaluation factors and also transformed them to numeric numbers so that they can be sorted out by their importance rate in the construction method.
    4. The correlation and importance rate of the construction methods are composed together to create a model which is useful in the decision making model for the reconstruction contract method in the preliminary reconstruction level.
    The found decision making model for the reconstruction contract methods will enable the union members to understand their situation and important items for themselves and utilize the information to evaluate the circumstances skillfully. The decision making model will be used as an yardstick for judgement with scientific and objective standards.
    번역하기

    In the past, the reconstruction contract method was decided by the size of the business profit that anticipated from the basic economic analysis of the project. If the business profit was expected high, construction cost-oriented contract system had...

    In the past, the reconstruction contract method was decided by the size of the business profit that anticipated from the basic economic analysis of the project. If the business profit was expected high, construction cost-oriented contract system had been recommended and if the profit was expected low, equity-oriented contract system was the way to run the business. But, any system without a close consideration on varying circumstances related to reconstruction methods and clients' ability might lead the whole business to discord of participators, business schedule delay, and cost rise.
    The following study engaged the inquiry by the exploratory research and interviews with specialists to figure out the factors needed for choosing a reconstruction method, and then applied AHP methodology to the found factors to reconstruct the decision making model.
    The decision making model for reconstruction contract method consists of 4 levels and the second level includes 'project' and 'participator'. Cost, business schedule, quality are the sub-level factors for the project, and 'client' and 'constructor' are the factors that will be evaluated for the participator.
    The followings are results and contribution of the study.
    1. The study examined the contract methods established by Ministry of Construction and Transportation for both Construction cost-oriented contract system and Equity-oriented contract system in every clause.
    2. The study drew an appraisal standard for the reconstruction contract method that can satisfy not only return profit but also clients and project.
    3. The study figured out the correlation and importance of the evaluation factors and also transformed them to numeric numbers so that they can be sorted out by their importance rate in the construction method.
    4. The correlation and importance rate of the construction methods are composed together to create a model which is useful in the decision making model for the reconstruction contract method in the preliminary reconstruction level.
    The found decision making model for the reconstruction contract methods will enable the union members to understand their situation and important items for themselves and utilize the information to evaluate the circumstances skillfully. The decision making model will be used as an yardstick for judgement with scientific and objective standards.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 배경 = 1
    • 1.2 연구의 목적 = 2
    • 1.3 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 목차
    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 배경 = 1
    • 1.2 연구의 목적 = 2
    • 1.3 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 2. 재건축 일반사항 = 6
    • 2.1 재건축 사업의 정의 및 개요 = 6
    • 2.2 재건축 사업의 추진절차 = 7
    • 2.3 재건축에 관한 기존 연구 고찰 = 17
    • 2.4 소결 = 20
    • 3. 재건축 사업의 공사계약체결방식의 비교 = 22
    • 3.1 재건축 사업의 공사계약체결방식 = 22
    • 3.2 도급제, 지분제의 비교(표준계약서를 중심으로) = 25
    • 3.3 소결 = 31
    • 4. AHP 방법론 = 32
    • 4.1 AHP 방법론 일반사항 = 32
    • 4.2 AHP를 활용한 분석방법 = 40
    • 4.3 소결 = 43
    • 5. 재건축 사업 공사계약체결방식의 평가 항목 = 45
    • 5.1 재건축사업 공사계약 체결방식 평가항목 선정을 위한 사전 연구 = 45
    • 5.2 재건축 사업 공사계약체결방식 평가 항목의 선정 = 49
    • 5.3 소결
    • 6. 재건축 공사계약체결방식 평가 factor와 대안의 비교 = 57
    • 6.1 프로젝트 비용 = 58
    • 6.2 프로젝트 사업공기 = 63
    • 6.3 프로젝트 품질 = 68
    • 6.4 사업주체중 발주자 = 72
    • 6.5 사업주체중 시공자 = 78
    • 6.6 재건축 공사계약체결방식 의사결정모델의 활용 = 83
    • 6.7 소결 = 87
    • 7. 재건축 계약체결방식 의사결정 모델 사례 검증 = 89
    • 7.1 사례단지 1 = 89
    • 7.2 사례단지 2 = 91
    • 7.3 사례단지 3 = 93
    • 7.4 사례단지 4 = 95
    • 7.5 사례단지 5 = 97
    • 7.6 사례단지 6 = 99
    • 7.7 소결 = 101
    • 8. 결론 = 104
    • 8.1 연구의 결과 = 104
    • 8.2 향후 연구 과제 = 107
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼