RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    1920년대 동인지 문학의 근대성 연구 = Modernity of Coterie Magazine Literature in the 1920`s

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8656022

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 高麗大學校 大學院, 2002

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(박사) -- 고려대학교 대학원 , 국어국문학과 , 2003. 2

    • 발행연도

      2002

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      810.906 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      238p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 224-235

    • 소장기관
      • 고려대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 고려대학교 세종학술정보원 소장기관정보
      • 국립중앙도서관 국립중앙도서관 우편복사 서비스
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The first literary coterie magazines as‘a literary medium’appeared in the early 1920’s. The magazines including Changjo(1919.2∼1921.6), Peyheo(1920.7∼1921.10), and Baekjo(1922.1∼1923.6) were the first periodicals which tried to make literature a specialized field. They planned to develop‘new literature movement’on the basis of social differentiation theory in the modern times. This dissertation shows the topography of the literary field in the early 1920's from a new angle. For the purpose, it deals with what logic various aspects of texts in the field of coterie magazine literature were placed by and what
    functions and effects they had.
    Chapter 2 of this dissertation describes the characteristic of modernity in the colonial period of Korea and the intellectual topography of new intelligentsia before and after the 1920's. And then it concretely draws the topographical map of coterie magazine literature in the early 1920's and infers the position and the form of coterie magazine discourse. While the writers of the coterie magazines placed themselves within the ‘Cultural Movement' which coeval
    intelligent youths had developed, they tried to differentiate their discourse from others' within the movement.
    Chapter 3 discusses how the writers constructed the concepts of‘literature’and‘artist’, and how they recognized genre system and specialized each genre. It is clear that the autonomy of literature and the concept of artist were produced from the social differentiation theory of the modern times. And also the specialization of each genre was involved in the modern epistemology which gave the subject a new definition and explained the world with it.
    Chapter 4 analyzes three types of recognition: the subject as a doer and the planning of‘reconstruction’, the subject as a self-reflector and the expression of‘the inner world’, and the subject as an observer and the discovery of‘reality’. They are classified according as how the attitude and the position of subject are arranged. And they were not only tightly connected with each other but also clearly confronted with in the field of coterie magazine literature. The exploration of the inner relevance among them is useful to grasp the topography of coterie magazine literature with the factors of
    illuminism, romanticism, and realism.
    Chapter 5 considers the meaning structure and the function of
    ‘representations’, which show the method that the subject and the object are related to each other, and examines how modern desire concretely works in coterie magazine literature. In the process, it is verified that the desire of subject is projected on the representation and reversely the effect of representation produces the desire of subject. This chapter takes notice of some representations including‘love’,‘train and steamboat’, ‘nature’, ‘children’, and‘alienated persons(madmanㆍopium addictㆍbeggarㆍvagabond)’. The meaning structure of the representations is newly produced and weaved in the historical phases of the modern times, and consequently they have specific function and effect to represent the modern times and its esthetics.
    In this dissertation, with the documents of coterie magazines, I attempt to reconstruct the ground that‘modern literature’ was constructed in the early 1920’. It is to look into the beginning of Korean modern literature. I reconsider values or ideas already established by the literary history, as historical facts. When the literary history as a production of the modern times fails to take its own historicity into account, the view of‘the modern times’becomes the subject of judgement across the entire history of literature. In conclusion, I intend, by exposing the historicity of modern literature, to revaluate the current stream of literature against it and reconsider the method of judgement or estimation from the literary history.
    번역하기

    The first literary coterie magazines as‘a literary medium’appeared in the early 1920’s. The magazines including Changjo(1919.2∼1921.6), Peyheo(1920.7∼1921.10), and Baekjo(1922.1∼1923.6) were the first periodicals which tried to make litera...

    The first literary coterie magazines as‘a literary medium’appeared in the early 1920’s. The magazines including Changjo(1919.2∼1921.6), Peyheo(1920.7∼1921.10), and Baekjo(1922.1∼1923.6) were the first periodicals which tried to make literature a specialized field. They planned to develop‘new literature movement’on the basis of social differentiation theory in the modern times. This dissertation shows the topography of the literary field in the early 1920's from a new angle. For the purpose, it deals with what logic various aspects of texts in the field of coterie magazine literature were placed by and what
    functions and effects they had.
    Chapter 2 of this dissertation describes the characteristic of modernity in the colonial period of Korea and the intellectual topography of new intelligentsia before and after the 1920's. And then it concretely draws the topographical map of coterie magazine literature in the early 1920's and infers the position and the form of coterie magazine discourse. While the writers of the coterie magazines placed themselves within the ‘Cultural Movement' which coeval
    intelligent youths had developed, they tried to differentiate their discourse from others' within the movement.
    Chapter 3 discusses how the writers constructed the concepts of‘literature’and‘artist’, and how they recognized genre system and specialized each genre. It is clear that the autonomy of literature and the concept of artist were produced from the social differentiation theory of the modern times. And also the specialization of each genre was involved in the modern epistemology which gave the subject a new definition and explained the world with it.
    Chapter 4 analyzes three types of recognition: the subject as a doer and the planning of‘reconstruction’, the subject as a self-reflector and the expression of‘the inner world’, and the subject as an observer and the discovery of‘reality’. They are classified according as how the attitude and the position of subject are arranged. And they were not only tightly connected with each other but also clearly confronted with in the field of coterie magazine literature. The exploration of the inner relevance among them is useful to grasp the topography of coterie magazine literature with the factors of
    illuminism, romanticism, and realism.
    Chapter 5 considers the meaning structure and the function of
    ‘representations’, which show the method that the subject and the object are related to each other, and examines how modern desire concretely works in coterie magazine literature. In the process, it is verified that the desire of subject is projected on the representation and reversely the effect of representation produces the desire of subject. This chapter takes notice of some representations including‘love’,‘train and steamboat’, ‘nature’, ‘children’, and‘alienated persons(madmanㆍopium addictㆍbeggarㆍvagabond)’. The meaning structure of the representations is newly produced and weaved in the historical phases of the modern times, and consequently they have specific function and effect to represent the modern times and its esthetics.
    In this dissertation, with the documents of coterie magazines, I attempt to reconstruct the ground that‘modern literature’ was constructed in the early 1920’. It is to look into the beginning of Korean modern literature. I reconsider values or ideas already established by the literary history, as historical facts. When the literary history as a production of the modern times fails to take its own historicity into account, the view of‘the modern times’becomes the subject of judgement across the entire history of literature. In conclusion, I intend, by exposing the historicity of modern literature, to revaluate the current stream of literature against it and reconsider the method of judgement or estimation from the literary history.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 차례 = ⅰ
    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1-1 연구 목적과 방법 = 1
    • 1-2 연구사 검토와 문제제기 = 5
    • 2. 동인지의 발생과 역사적 조건 = 18
    • 차례 = ⅰ
    • 1. 서론 = 1
    • 1-1 연구 목적과 방법 = 1
    • 1-2 연구사 검토와 문제제기 = 5
    • 2. 동인지의 발생과 역사적 조건 = 18
    • 2-1 새로운 창작 계층과 문화적 계몽주의 = 18
    • 2-2 태서문예신보 의 구도 = 46
    • 3. ‘문학’개념과 개별 장르에 대한 인식 = 68
    • 3-1 문학의 자율성과 예술가의 의미 = 68
    • 3-2 장르 체계와 개별 장르의 특성화 논리 = 94
    • 4. 동인지 담론의 주체와 지형 = 120
    • 4-1 행위 주체와 ‘개조’의 기획 = 120
    • 4-2 성찰 주체와 ‘내면’의 표현 = 129
    • 4-3 관찰 주체와 ‘사실’의 발견 = 140
    • 5. 근대적 표상의 의미구조와 작용 = 150
    • 5-1 연애 = 150
    • 5-2 기차와 기선 = 160
    • 5-3 자연 = 173
    • 5-4 어린이 = 182
    • 5-5 주변인들 = 192
    • 6. 결론 = 214
    • 참고문헌 = 224
    • 영문요약Abstract = 236
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼