지체장애인의 자립생활에 영향을 미치는 요인

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study are to progress the level of Independent Living. It was through that make an investigation into Independent Living Level of Korean with disability, that find influential factor for Independent Living which available services and demographic-social characteristics. This survey was done 195 person with physical disability at nine useable institution.
The results of a hypotheses of the study are as follows;
First, the highest Independent level, especially Mental independent level, is their thirties and forties in the group of survey recipient. People who a monthly income are below two hundred thousand won has low Mental Independent Level. Person with employment is that Independent Level is higher than person with unemployment, especially Physical, Movable, Social independent level are done. The lower disability grade is, the higher Movable independent level is. The earlier the time of disability appearance is, the higher Independent level is, especially Movable, Social independent level are done. The longer a period of disabled condition is, the higher Independent level is, especially Movable, Mental, Social independent level are done. The more they have cognize disability as a serious problem, the lower Independent level is, especially Movable, Mental, Social independent level are done.
Second, The higher Satisfaction level about welfare center and the organization for promoting employment of the disabled is, the lower Mental and Social independent level is.
Third, The higher Satisfaction level about Services is, the lower Mental independent level is; concrete facts about services are as follows: The higher Satisfaction level about Medical rehabilitation, Rehabilitation consultation, Rehabilitation camp is, the higher Movable independent level is. The higher satisfaction level about recreation activity for the disabled is, the higher Independent and Movable independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of Movable service is, the higher Movable independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of Services for reinnovation of their houses is high, the more Physical independent level is high, but Mental, Social independent level is low. The higher Satisfaction level of care center is, the lower Mental, Social independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level about family support for the seriously disabled people and moving bathing service is, the higher Movable independent level is.
Fourth, The higher Satisfaction level of governmental support is, the lower Independent and Mental independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of pension is, the lower Mental independence is. The higher Satisfaction level of medicaid for the disabled is, the lower Mental and Social independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of education support for the disableds' children is, the more Physical independent level is high, but independent level is low. The higher Satisfaction level of fund for independent living is, the lower Mental and Social independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of house rental service for them is, the lower Social independent level is. The higher Satisfaction level of cutting taxation and living expenses is, the higher Mental independence is.
Fifth, The longer a period of education is, the higher Independent and Mental independent level is. Person with experience of special education is that Physical independent level is low. Person with experience of non-ordinary education is that all area, except Mental independent level, is low.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
• 제 1 절 문제제기 = 1
• 제 2 절 연구목적 = 4
• 1. 연구목적 = 4
• 2. 연구문제 = 6
• Ⅱ. 자립생활 관련 제 이론 = 7
• 제 1 절 재활과 자립 = 7
• 1. 재활(Rehabilitation)의 개념과 목표 = 7
• 2. 재활에서 자립생활로의 전환 = 9
• 3. 자립생활의 이상(理想) = 14
• 제 2 절 사회통합과 자립생활 = 16
• 1. 사회통합 = 16
• 2. 사회통합과 자립생활 = 24
• 제 3 절 장애인의 자기결정권(Self-Determination) = 27
• 1. 역량강화(Empowerment)와 자기결정권 = 27
• 2. 자립생활패러다임과 역량강화 = 28
• 3. 장애인의 자기결정권 확보와 자립생활 = 33
• Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 38
• 제 1 절 연구과정 = 38
• 제 2 절 조사설계 = 38
• 1. 조사의 목적과 대상 = 38
• 2. 자료수집방법 = 40
• 3. 조사도구 = 40
• 4. 자료분석방법 = 44
• 제 3 절 연구의 한계 = 45
• Ⅳ. 조사결과와 분석 = 46
• 제 1 절 자립도 = 46
• 1. 신변자립도 = 46
• 2. 이동자립도 = 47
• 3. 심리자립도 = 49
• 4. 사회자립도 = 50
• 5. 자립도 = 52
• 제 2 절 조사대상자의 인구사회학적 특성 = 52
• 1. 조사대상자의 인구사회학적 특성 = 52
• 2. 인구사회학적 특성과 자립도 = 55
• 3. 인구사회학적 특성과 각 자립영역 = 57
• 제 3 절 서비스 기관과 자립도 = 62
• 1. 빈도분석 = 62
• 2. 상관관계 = 63
• 제 4 절 서비스 종류와 자립도 = 65
• 1. 빈도분석 = 65
• 2. 상관관계 = 66
• 제 5 절 정부지원과 자립도 = 69
• 1. 빈도분석 = 69
• 2. 상관관계 = 70
• 제 6 절 교육특성과 자립생활 = 73
• 1. 빈도분석 = 73
• 2. 자립도와의 관계 = 74
• Ⅴ. 결론 = 77
• 제 1 절 자립생활에 영향을 미치는 요인 = 77
• 1. 긍정적 요인 = 77
• 2. 부정적 요인 = 78
• 제 2 절 지체장애인의 자립생활을 위한 제언 = 79
• <참고문헌> = 81
• <부 록> = 88
• Abstract = 93