RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    도덕적 추론과 도덕적 직관, 인지양식 및 메타인지의 관계 = The relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition, cognitive style, metacognition

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8546972

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study investigated the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition, cognitive style, metacognition. This study sought to answer three questions.
    1. What is the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition?
    2. What is the relationship between moral reasoning and cognitive style, metacognition?
    3. What is the difference between male and female in moral reasoning?
    The subjects of this study were 137 students of elementary school, 117 students of middle school, 148 students of high school located in Seoul, and 72 students from Chung-Ang University. Those subjects, except college students, were measured moral reasoning by the Defining issues test(DIT), cognitive style by the Group Embedded Figures Test(GEFT), and metacognition by which used prior research(Swanson & Hill, 1993). Middle and high school students have controlled the intelligence variable. College students only were investigated the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition by interview and a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Moral dilemmas which presented to college students were constructed one common dilemma and two taboo dilemmas. Interview focused on the responses after listening the tape-recorded moral dilemmas and this process has been recorded on video tape. Criterions which considered as the prototypical properties of moral intuition are emotional response(facial expression, gut feeling etc), quick and automatic judgement, low level of logical language expression, strong beliefs of judgement, post-hoc reasoning after moral judgement. Data of this study was analyzed Chi-square, Pearson's moment correlation, partial correlation, biserial correlation, t-test analysis, ANOVA, ANCOVA, Multiple regression.
    The findings of this study are as follows.
    First, moral intuition, like moral reasoning, showed a causal role of moral judgement and at this case moral reasoning showed a post-hoc reasoning after moral judgement. Also, these evidences showed that taboo moral dilemmas were more frequent than common dilemma. Additionally, the difference in sex was not significant.
    Second, cognitive style and moral reasoning correlated significantly.
    Also, field-independent cognitive style group is higher than field-dependent cognitive style group in moral reasoning score(elementary school: F=4.086, p<.05, middle school: F=4.070, p<.05, high school: F=6.440, p<.05). Metacognition and moral reasoning correlated significantly. Higher level metacognition group demonstrated higher moral reasoning score than do lower level metacognition group (elementary school: F=14.936, p<.05, middle school: F=7.241, p<.01, high school: F=6.441, p<.05). Also, Interaction effect of cognitive style and metacognition was not demonstrated in moral reasoning, significantly.
    Third, the difference of sex in moral reasoning score was notsignificant in elementary and middle school. But in high school female students was higher than male students in moral reasoning score(t=4.133, p<.01). Interaction effect of sex and age was not demonstrated in moral reasoning, significantly. Additionally, effects of moral reasoning across sex, age, cognitive style, metacognition were ordered of age(β=.339, p<.01), cognitive style(β=.213, p<.01), metacognition(β=.203, p<.01), sex(β =.118, p<.01). Based on this result, it showed that sex variable was the lowest variable in effect of moral reasoning among four variables.
    These findings suggest that moral intuition should be considered as a causal cognitive process of moral judgement. Also, both cognitive style and metacognitive ability should be treated as students' cognitive characters in moral education for developing moral reasoning and cognitive moral development. Finally, the difference of sex in moral reasoning ability suggests a need of reevaluate in further research, because the findings of this study contrasted with the results of many prior researches and sex variable in moral reasoning have been treated as an important topic in research of Kohlberg's cognitive moral development theory
    번역하기

    This study investigated the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition, cognitive style, metacognition. This study sought to answer three questions. 1. What is the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition? 2. What is th...

    This study investigated the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition, cognitive style, metacognition. This study sought to answer three questions.
    1. What is the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition?
    2. What is the relationship between moral reasoning and cognitive style, metacognition?
    3. What is the difference between male and female in moral reasoning?
    The subjects of this study were 137 students of elementary school, 117 students of middle school, 148 students of high school located in Seoul, and 72 students from Chung-Ang University. Those subjects, except college students, were measured moral reasoning by the Defining issues test(DIT), cognitive style by the Group Embedded Figures Test(GEFT), and metacognition by which used prior research(Swanson & Hill, 1993). Middle and high school students have controlled the intelligence variable. College students only were investigated the relationship between moral reasoning and moral intuition by interview and a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Moral dilemmas which presented to college students were constructed one common dilemma and two taboo dilemmas. Interview focused on the responses after listening the tape-recorded moral dilemmas and this process has been recorded on video tape. Criterions which considered as the prototypical properties of moral intuition are emotional response(facial expression, gut feeling etc), quick and automatic judgement, low level of logical language expression, strong beliefs of judgement, post-hoc reasoning after moral judgement. Data of this study was analyzed Chi-square, Pearson's moment correlation, partial correlation, biserial correlation, t-test analysis, ANOVA, ANCOVA, Multiple regression.
    The findings of this study are as follows.
    First, moral intuition, like moral reasoning, showed a causal role of moral judgement and at this case moral reasoning showed a post-hoc reasoning after moral judgement. Also, these evidences showed that taboo moral dilemmas were more frequent than common dilemma. Additionally, the difference in sex was not significant.
    Second, cognitive style and moral reasoning correlated significantly.
    Also, field-independent cognitive style group is higher than field-dependent cognitive style group in moral reasoning score(elementary school: F=4.086, p<.05, middle school: F=4.070, p<.05, high school: F=6.440, p<.05). Metacognition and moral reasoning correlated significantly. Higher level metacognition group demonstrated higher moral reasoning score than do lower level metacognition group (elementary school: F=14.936, p<.05, middle school: F=7.241, p<.01, high school: F=6.441, p<.05). Also, Interaction effect of cognitive style and metacognition was not demonstrated in moral reasoning, significantly.
    Third, the difference of sex in moral reasoning score was notsignificant in elementary and middle school. But in high school female students was higher than male students in moral reasoning score(t=4.133, p<.01). Interaction effect of sex and age was not demonstrated in moral reasoning, significantly. Additionally, effects of moral reasoning across sex, age, cognitive style, metacognition were ordered of age(β=.339, p<.01), cognitive style(β=.213, p<.01), metacognition(β=.203, p<.01), sex(β =.118, p<.01). Based on this result, it showed that sex variable was the lowest variable in effect of moral reasoning among four variables.
    These findings suggest that moral intuition should be considered as a causal cognitive process of moral judgement. Also, both cognitive style and metacognitive ability should be treated as students' cognitive characters in moral education for developing moral reasoning and cognitive moral development. Finally, the difference of sex in moral reasoning ability suggests a need of reevaluate in further research, because the findings of this study contrasted with the results of many prior researches and sex variable in moral reasoning have been treated as an important topic in research of Kohlberg's cognitive moral development theory

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론 = 1
    • A. 연구문제의 제기 = 1
    • B. 연구의 목적 및 의의 = 8
    • C. 용어의 정의 = 10
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 13
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • A. 연구문제의 제기 = 1
    • B. 연구의 목적 및 의의 = 8
    • C. 용어의 정의 = 10
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 13
    • A. 인지적 도덕발달 연구 동향 = 13
    • B. 도덕적 추론과 도덕적 직관 = 21
    • C. 도덕적 추론과 인지양식의 관계 = 28
    • D. 도덕적 추론과 메타인지의 관계 = 33
    • III. 연구문제 및 가설 = 37
    • A. 연구문제 = 37
    • B. 연구가설 = 41
    • IV. 연구방법 및 절차 = 42
    • A. 연구대상 = 42
    • B. 측정도구 = 42
    • C. 연구절차 = 46
    • D. 자료분석 = 47
    • V. 결과 및 해석 = 48
    • A. 학교급별 집단의 특성 = 48
    • B. 도덕적 추론과 도덕적 직관의 관계 = 49
    • C. 도덕적 추론과 인지양식 및 메타인지의 관계 = 55
    • D. 성별 도덕적 추론능력 = 62
    • VI. 논의 및 결론 = 66
    • A 요약 = 66
    • B. 논의 = 69
    • C. 결론 = 71
    • D. 제언 = 73
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    • 부록
    • 부록 I. 도덕 추론 능력 검사(한국판 DIT)
    • 부록 II. 도덕 직관 검사용 딜레마
    • 부록 III. 도덕 직관 검사용 설문지
    • 부록 IV. 인지 양식 검사
    • 부록 V. 메타 인지 검사
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. Care, Clement, , 1996

    2. Emotion, Lyons, William E, Gregg Revivals, , 1993

    3. Writing, White, , 1987

    4. Moral Boundaries, Tronto, , 1993

    5. Moral psychology, Lapsley, Daniel K, Westview Press, Moral psychology, , 1996

    6. Conceptualization, Fabes, Eisenberg, , 1990

    7. Difference voices, Stacks, , 1990

    8. Altruistic emotion, Eisenberg, , 1986

    9. The moral emotions, Haidt, , 2000

    10. Emotion and adaption, Lazarus, , 1991

    1. Care, Clement, , 1996

    2. Emotion, Lyons, William E, Gregg Revivals, , 1993

    3. Writing, White, , 1987

    4. Moral Boundaries, Tronto, , 1993

    5. Moral psychology, Lapsley, Daniel K, Westview Press, Moral psychology, , 1996

    6. Conceptualization, Fabes, Eisenberg, , 1990

    7. Difference voices, Stacks, , 1990

    8. Altruistic emotion, Eisenberg, , 1986

    9. The moral emotions, Haidt, , 2000

    10. Emotion and adaption, Lazarus, , 1991

    11. Evolutionary approaches, Keller, , 1996

    12. Gender role development, Cheung, , 1996

    13. The nature of the child, Kagan, Jerome, BasicBooks, , 1984

    14. A model of dual attitude, Schooler, Linsey, Wilson, , 2000

    15. The process of education, Bruner, Jerome S, Vintage Books, The process of education, , 1960

    16. A tretise of human nature, Hume, , 1992

    17. What influenceslearning ?, Walberg, Wang, Haertel, What influences learning?, , 1990

    18. Essays on moral development, Kohlberg, Lawrence, Harper & Row, , 1981

    19. Intuition : how we think and act, Bastick, Tony, J. Wiley, , 1982

    20. On the nature of cognitive style, Riding, , 1997

    21. Understanding strategy selection, Roberts, Newton, , 2001

    22. Developing a thinking skills program, Beyer, Barry K., Allyn and Bacon, , 1988

    23. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, Greenwald, Banaji, , 1995

    24. Cognitive psychology: Its implication, Anderson, , 1990

    25. Construct validation of metacognition, Allen, Armour-Thomas, Construct validation ofmetacognition, , 1993

    26. IQ intelligence: The surprising truth, Ceci, , 2001

    27. Moral cognition: Individual difference, Bjorklund, , 2000

    28. Control and automaticity in social life, Bargh, Wegner, , 1998

    29. Moral orientation and moral development, Gilligan, , 1987

    30. Marketing managers: Caught in the Middle, Corey, , 1993

    31. Strategy choice in sociocultural context, Ellis, , 1997

    32. What makes a problem an ethical problem?, Braunack-Mayer, , 2001

    33. The dialogical self : meaning as movement, Hermans, H. J. M, Academic Press, , 1993

    34. Young children's knowledge about thinking, Flavell, John H, University of Chicago Press, , 1995

    35. The measurement of moral judgement(Vols1-2), Kohlberg, Colby, , 1987

    36. Empathy, "social cognition, and moral action, Hoffman, "Empathy, , 1991

    37. Sources of power : how people make decisions, Klein, Gary A, MIT Press, , 1999

    38. The development of morality. In W. Damon(ed.), Turiel, , 1998

    39. Research on metacognition in special education, Montague, , 1998

    40. Smart problem solving : Howmetacognition helps, Davidson, Sternberg, Smart problem solving: Howmetacognition helps, , 1998

    41. 의료윤리 교육 프로그램 개발 연구, 홍성훈, 의료윤리교육 프로그램 개발 연구, , 2000

    42. Learning styles in Continuing Medical Education, Curry, , 1983

    43. Kohlberg and Piaget on stage and moral reasoning, Carpendale, , 2000

    44. Moral dumbfounding: When intuitionfinds no reason, Murpy, Bjorklund, Haidt, , 2000

    45. Flourishing: The positive person and the good life, Haidt, Keyes, , 2001

    46. Development of children's prosocial moral judgement, Eisenberg, , 1979

    47. From IQ to IC: A Dispositional view of intelligence, Ritchhart, , 2001

    48. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action, Bandura A., Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action, , 1991

    49. The virtues and vices ofmoral development theorists, Helwig, Turiel, Nucci, , 1996

    50. A Preliminary cross-cultural study ofmoral intuition, O'Neill, Petrinovich, , 1997

    51. Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning, Galotti, , 1988

    52. Metacognitive aspects of moral reasoningand behavior, Hill.G, Swanson, , 1993

    53. Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity, Messick, , 1976

    54. Introduction: Perspectives on morality ineveryday life, Killen, Hart, , 1995

    55. A two-tiered cognitive architecture for moral reasoning, Bolender, , 2001

    56. The relation of empathy to prosocial andrelated behavior, Eisenberg, Miller, , 1987

    57. Gender and dilemma differences in real-lifemoral judgement, Krebs, Wark, , 1996

    58. Influences on children's sharing ina multicultural setting, McBride-Chang, Stewart, , 2000

    59. The ethics of care and women's experiences of public space, Day, , 2000

    60. Determinations of meaning: Discourseand moral socialization, Much, Shweder, , 1991

    61. Influence of wording and framing effectson moral intuitions, O'Neill, Petrinovich, , 1996

    62. Mapping the moral domain: New images of self inrelationship, Gilligan, , 1989

    63. The return of stage 6: Itsprinciple and moral point of view, Levine, Kohlberg, Boyd, , 1990

    64. Moral stages: A current formulationand a response to critics, Kohlberg, Hewer, Levine, , 1983

    65. 한국 청소년의 도덕성 발달 진단을 위한 연구, 문용린, , 1994

    66. Remapping the moral domain: New images of self inrelationship, Gilligan, , 1988

    67. Towards a categorization of cognitive styleand learning style, Rayner, Riding, , 1997

    68. Evidence for altruism: Toward a Pluralism of Prosocial Motives, Shaw, Batson, , 1991

    69. Emotional networks in the brain. In M. Lewis & J.Haviland(eds.), LeDoux, , 1993

    70. Language culture, and moral development: AVygotskian perspective, Tappen, "Language culture, , 1997

    71. Culture and Systems of Thought: Holistic Versus Analytic Cognition, Nisbett, Ara Norenzayan, , 2001

    72. Judgment misguided : intuition and error in public decision making, Baron, Jonathan, Oxford University Press, , 1998

    73. In a different voice : psychological theory and women's development, Gilligan, Carol, Harvard University Press, In a different voice: psychological theory and women'sdevelopment, , 1993

    74. Mental-Attentionalcapacity: Does cognitive style make a difference?, Roncadin, Baillargeon, Pascal-Leone, , 1998

    75. Moral developmental theory: Acritique of its Kantian presuppositions, Christoper, Campbell, , 1996

    76. 한국인의 도덕판단과 행동선택에 관한 DIT적용 연구, 박찬주, , 1989

    77. Judging social issues: Difficulties inconsistencies, andconsistencies, Turiel, "Judging social issues: Difficulties inconsistencies, , 1991

    78. Mathematics and metacognition: What isthe nature of the relationship?, Cornoldi, Lucangeli, , 1997

    79. The future of moral psychology: truth initution, and the pluralist Way, Haidt, Shweder, "The future of moral psychology: truth initution, , 1993

    80. M etacognition: Underly ing dimens ions andrelation to cognitive s ty le, Deonaraine, Metacognition: Underlying dimensions and relation tocognitive style, , 1998

    81. The Kohlberg-Gilligan Controversy: lessons for AccountingEthics Education, Reiter, , 1996

    82. A hot/cool-system analysis of delay ofgratification: Dynamics of willpower, Mischel, Metcalf, , 1999

    83. Cross-cultural communication: An essential dimension ofeffective education, Taylor, , 1990

    84. Hierarchical Complexity of tasks shows the existenceof developmental stages, Commons, , 1998

    85. Moral judgement: Theory and Research on differencebetween males and females, Brabeck, , 1993

    86. Ethical sensitivity and moral reasoningamong men and women in the professions, Brabeck, Bebeau, , 1989

    87. Learning culture the way informations do: Observing Imitating,and participating, Fiske, "Learning culture the way informations do: Observing Imitating, , 1999

    88. Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: Whatmakes an expert student?, Sternberg, R. J., Sternberg, "Metacognition, , 1998

    89. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functionsof the prefrontal cortex, Damasio, , 1998

    90. Information function of empathic emotion: Learning thatwe value the other's welfare, Baston, , 1995

    91. Making connections : the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School, Gilligan, Carol, Harvard University Press, , 1990

    92. Facilitating conceptual change learning: The need forteachers to support metacognition, Beeth, , 1998

    93. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A socialintuitionist approach to moral judgment, Haidt, The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionistapproach to moral judgment, , 2001

    94. Children's metacognition about reading: Issuesin definition, measurement, and instruction, Paris, Jacobs, "Children's metacognition about reading:Issues in definition measurement, , 1987

    95. Fraud detection: The effect of client integrity andcompetence and auditor cognitive style, Bernardi, , 1994

    96. Justice as reversibility: The claim to moral adequacy of ahighest stage of moral judgement, Kohlberg, , 1981

    97. Beyond intuition and instinct blindness:Toward an evolutionarily Rigorous cognitive science, Cosmides, Tooby, , 1994

    98. The Role of liking in perception of themoral responsibility to help: A cultural perspective, Miller, Bersoff, , 1998

    99. The narrative approach to moral development:From the epistemic subject to dialogical selves, Day, Tappen, , 1996

    100. Moral reasoning among Tibetan monks: Astudy of Buddhist adolescents and young adults in Nepal, Huebner, Garrod, , 1993

    101. Learning to think arithmetically: Problem solving,metacognition, and sense making in arithmetics, Schoenfeld, "Learning to think arithmetically: Problem solving, , 1992

    102. Exploring metacognition: A description of levels ofmetacognition and their relation to moral judgement, Schrader, , 1988

    103. Antisocial behavior and psychophysiology: A biosocialperspective and a prefrontal dysfunction hypothesis, Raine, , 1997

    104. From is ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacyand get away with it in the study of moral development, Kohlberg, , 1971

    105. An analysis of the association of traditional demographicvariables with the moral reasoning of auditing students and auditors, Shaub, , 1994

    106. A study of moral metacognition as a factor influencingmoral reasoning and ethical behavior in delinquent and nondelinquentadolescents, Hill, , 1988

    107. Caught in a narrow Kantian perception of prosocialdevelopment: Reaction to Campbell and Christopher's critique of moraldevelopment theory, Eisenberg, , 1996

    108. An empirical investigation of locus ofcontrol and the structure of moral reasoning: Examining the ethicaldecision-making processes of sales managers, Cherry, Fraedrich, , 2000

    109. The differential contribution of field-dependentand field-independent cognitive style to sociocognitive transaction inpromoting scientific reasoning, Levin, Druyan, , 1996

    110. The effect of Learning style instructional resources onfifth-grade suburban- student's metacognition achievement, attitudes,and ability to teach themselves, Schiering, "The effect of Learning style instructional resources onfifth-grade suburban- student's metacognition achievement, , 2000

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼