RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    ARCS 모델을 활용한 개별화 동기유발 메시지가 수학과 학습동기 및 학업성취에 미치는 효과 = Effect of individually prescribed motivating messages applying ARCS model on learning motivation and academic achievement of mathematics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8476419

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      안동 : 안동대학교 교육대학원, 2001

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 안동대학교 교육대학원 , 교육학전공 , 2001. 8

    • 발행연도

      2001

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      376.4141 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상북도

    • 형태사항

      ⅳ, 53p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 39-42

    • 소장기관
      • 국립경국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산대학교 밀양캠퍼스 나노생명과학도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to find out the possibility of applying the ARCS model and the effect of motivating messages on learners' academic achievement and learning motivation by individualizing motivation factors A(Attention), R(Relevance), C,(Confidence) S(Satisfaction) and then applying the factors to mathematics which is low in academic achievement and motivation. For the purposes of the study, the question "Is there any difference in regard to learning motivation and academic achievement between the learning group which receives individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors and the group which doesn't? was asked. In the study, 43 students in the 3rd grade of ○○ elementary school, Andong, were randomly divided into 21 students for the experimental group and 22 students for the control group. In the experimental group, motivating messages applying A, R, C, S factors, which were modified according to investigator's observance, learner's motivation, and self-assessment were sent 12 times for 3 weeks. However, in the control group, motivating messages without applying the factors were sent. After the experiment, learning motivation tests and academic achievement tests were practiced. The t-test, which was composed of a motivating message applying A, R, C, S as independent factors and the mean score of learning motivation tests and academic achievement tests as subordinate factors, was practiced to check the difference of mean between the two groups. The level of meaningful degree was α=.05. The results of the study are as follows. First, the learning group which received individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors had a higher score than the group which didn't in the mean score of learning motivation tests. Second, the learning group which received individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors had meaningful score in academic achievement. These two results showed that A, R, C, S motivation factors were effective for improving learning motivation and academic achievement. The suggestions on the basis of the results of the study were drawn as follows; because learning motivation cannot be formed within a short period, along term research is required. There is a limitation of time to practice A, R, C, S model, so various messages and a method of application should be developed. In addition, other new criteria which can measure learning motivation need to be developed.

    번역하기

    This study aimed to find out the possibility of applying the ARCS model and the effect of motivating messages on learners' academic achievement and learning motivation by individualizing motivation factors A(Attention), R(Relevance), C,(Confidence) S(...

    This study aimed to find out the possibility of applying the ARCS model and the effect of motivating messages on learners' academic achievement and learning motivation by individualizing motivation factors A(Attention), R(Relevance), C,(Confidence) S(Satisfaction) and then applying the factors to mathematics which is low in academic achievement and motivation. For the purposes of the study, the question "Is there any difference in regard to learning motivation and academic achievement between the learning group which receives individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors and the group which doesn't? was asked. In the study, 43 students in the 3rd grade of ○○ elementary school, Andong, were randomly divided into 21 students for the experimental group and 22 students for the control group. In the experimental group, motivating messages applying A, R, C, S factors, which were modified according to investigator's observance, learner's motivation, and self-assessment were sent 12 times for 3 weeks. However, in the control group, motivating messages without applying the factors were sent. After the experiment, learning motivation tests and academic achievement tests were practiced. The t-test, which was composed of a motivating message applying A, R, C, S as independent factors and the mean score of learning motivation tests and academic achievement tests as subordinate factors, was practiced to check the difference of mean between the two groups. The level of meaningful degree was α=.05. The results of the study are as follows. First, the learning group which received individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors had a higher score than the group which didn't in the mean score of learning motivation tests. Second, the learning group which received individually prescribed motivating message applying A, R, C, S factors had meaningful score in academic achievement. These two results showed that A, R, C, S motivation factors were effective for improving learning motivation and academic achievement. The suggestions on the basis of the results of the study were drawn as follows; because learning motivation cannot be formed within a short period, along term research is required. There is a limitation of time to practice A, R, C, S model, so various messages and a method of application should be developed. In addition, other new criteria which can measure learning motivation need to be developed.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 5
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 6
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 = 5
    • 3. 용어 정의 = 6
    • 4. 연구 범위와 제한점 = 7
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 8
    • 1. 동기와 학습 = 8
    • 2. ARCS 모델에 근거한 학습동기 = 11
    • 3. ARCS 모델의 특징 = 13
    • 4. ARCS 동기 유발 전략 = 16
    • 5. 피드백의 유형 및 적용 시기 = 20
    • Ⅲ. 연구 가설 = 23
    • Ⅳ. 연구 방법 = 25
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 25
    • 2. 실험 설계 = 25
    • 3. 실험 처치 = 26
    • 4. 검사도구 = 28
    • 5. 실험절차 = 28
    • 6. 통계 처리 = 29
    • Ⅴ. 연구 결과 = 30
    • 1. 가설 1의 검증 결과 = 30
    • 2. 가설 2의 검증 결과 = 32
    • Ⅵ. 논의 = 33
    • Ⅶ. 결론 및 제언 = 37
    • 1. 결론 = 37
    • 2. 제언 = 37
    • 참고문헌 = 39
    • 부록 = 43
    • 《부록 1》 교과흥미도 조사 = 43
    • 《부록 2》 동기 자기 평가 = 44
    • 《부록 3》 동기유발 메시지 = 45
    • 《부록 4》 학습 동기 검사 = 47
    • 《부록 5》 수학과 학업성취도 검사 = 48
    • 《부록 6》 통계집단에게 보낸 메시지 = 51
    • 영문 초록 = 52
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼