RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    誤謬分析에 관한 硏究 : 英語話者의 韓國語習得 過程에서 發生되는 文法的 誤謬를 中心으로 = (An) error analysis : syntactic errors made by english speakers learning Korean

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T843248

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 건국대학교 대학원, 1984

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 건국대학교 대학원 , 영어영문학과 , 1984

    • 발행연도

      1984

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • KDC

      740 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      84p. : 삽도 ; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌: p. 81-84

    • 소장기관
      • 건국대학교 상허기념도서관 소장기관정보
      • 남서울대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국학중앙연구원 한국학도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한성대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    An analysis of errors made by twenty English speaking students learning the Korean language has been performed in order to determine the sources of errors.
    Supporters of the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis claim that the existing mother tongue habit interferes with learning a second language, and thus that a taxanomy of linguistics contrasts between the learner's mother tongue and the second language he is learning makes it possible to predict the difficulties he will encounter.
    Supporters of Error Analysis, however, point out that second-language learning is, like first-language learning, a creative process of constructing a system, and that most errors made by a second-language learner can, in fact, be attributed to the complexity of the target language itself.
    In order to investigate what strategies the English speaker employs in learning Korean as a foreign language, a test requiring a written translation of thirty English sentences was administered to twenty speakers of English who are currently taking a Korean language course at The University of Maryland in the Eighth United States Army compound, Seoul, Korea.
    The error types were categorized into over-generalization, transfer, translation and indeterminate origin.
    The results of the investigation are: First, the errors made by the elementary level students are found not qualitatively different from those made by the intermediate level students. Second, overgeneralization is found to have been employed by both groups of students as the major strategy. Third, one of the major characteristics of generalization is found to be simplification of the syntactic system of the target language.
    번역하기

    An analysis of errors made by twenty English speaking students learning the Korean language has been performed in order to determine the sources of errors. Supporters of the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis claim that the existing mother tongue habit ...

    An analysis of errors made by twenty English speaking students learning the Korean language has been performed in order to determine the sources of errors.
    Supporters of the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis claim that the existing mother tongue habit interferes with learning a second language, and thus that a taxanomy of linguistics contrasts between the learner's mother tongue and the second language he is learning makes it possible to predict the difficulties he will encounter.
    Supporters of Error Analysis, however, point out that second-language learning is, like first-language learning, a creative process of constructing a system, and that most errors made by a second-language learner can, in fact, be attributed to the complexity of the target language itself.
    In order to investigate what strategies the English speaker employs in learning Korean as a foreign language, a test requiring a written translation of thirty English sentences was administered to twenty speakers of English who are currently taking a Korean language course at The University of Maryland in the Eighth United States Army compound, Seoul, Korea.
    The error types were categorized into over-generalization, transfer, translation and indeterminate origin.
    The results of the investigation are: First, the errors made by the elementary level students are found not qualitatively different from those made by the intermediate level students. Second, overgeneralization is found to have been employed by both groups of students as the major strategy. Third, one of the major characteristics of generalization is found to be simplification of the syntactic system of the target language.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 대조분석 = 4
    • 2.1 대조분석 가설(Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis) = 4
    • 2.2 언어간의 상이점과 유사점 = 9
    • 목차
    • Ⅰ. 서론 = 4
    • Ⅱ. 대조분석 = 4
    • 2.1 대조분석 가설(Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis) = 4
    • 2.2 언어간의 상이점과 유사점 = 9
    • 2.3 대조분석의 양상 = 11
    • 2.4 대조분석에서의 오류의 의미 = 13
    • 2.5 관찰방법 = 13
    • 2.6 대조분석 비판 = 16
    • Ⅲ. 오류분석(Error Analysis) = 21
    • 3.1 오류분석의 정의 = 21
    • 3.2 오류분석의 대상 = 25
    • Ⅳ. 가설들의 상보적관계 = 31
    • 4.1 상보적 관계 = 31
    • 4.2 대조분석의 문제점 = 31
    • 4.3 오류분석과 대조분석의 관계 = 32
    • Ⅴ. 사례연구 = 34
    • 5.1 조사대상 = 35
    • 5.2 실험방법 = 35
    • 5.3 자료와 실험절차 = 36
    • 5.4 오류의 분류 = 38
    • 5.5 결과 및 토의 = 38
    • Ⅵ. 결론 = 48
    • 부록 = 50
    • ABSTRACT = 79
    • 참고문헌 = 81
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼