RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      통합교육에 대한 일반교사의 인식 연구 = (The) Study on Ordinary School Teachers' Awareness toward Inclusion Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8428759

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to analyze the ordinary school teachers' awareness toward inclusion education. The independent variables were sex, teaching careers, and the degree of concerns. Two hundred teachers were participated to analyze the awareness toward effective inclusion environments. The forty four-questions survey divided into four sections such as awareness, problems, competencies, and problem solving methods was developed. Each subparts contained eleven questions. Three-way Anova was utilized to analyze the awareness based on the responses of the survey.
      The results of the study was followed. (a) In the analysis of total 44 questionnaire, there were not different attitudes toward effective inclusion environments according to sex and teaching careers, however, there was different awareness according to the degree of concerns. (b) In the analysis of four subparts, there were not different awareness toward effective inclusion environments according to sex and teaching careers, however, there was different attitudes according to the degree of concerns in the two subparts such as awareness and problem solving methods, not in problems and competencies. Therefore, the problems to develop the effective inclusion environments is a difficult phenomenon in the schools' teachers. The teachers may know that the problems for effective inclusion environments is not include in the boundary of the teachers's abilities and endeavors.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to analyze the ordinary school teachers' awareness toward inclusion education. The independent variables were sex, teaching careers, and the degree of concerns. Two hundred teachers were participated to analyze the aware...

      The purpose of this study was to analyze the ordinary school teachers' awareness toward inclusion education. The independent variables were sex, teaching careers, and the degree of concerns. Two hundred teachers were participated to analyze the awareness toward effective inclusion environments. The forty four-questions survey divided into four sections such as awareness, problems, competencies, and problem solving methods was developed. Each subparts contained eleven questions. Three-way Anova was utilized to analyze the awareness based on the responses of the survey.
      The results of the study was followed. (a) In the analysis of total 44 questionnaire, there were not different attitudes toward effective inclusion environments according to sex and teaching careers, however, there was different awareness according to the degree of concerns. (b) In the analysis of four subparts, there were not different awareness toward effective inclusion environments according to sex and teaching careers, however, there was different attitudes according to the degree of concerns in the two subparts such as awareness and problem solving methods, not in problems and competencies. Therefore, the problems to develop the effective inclusion environments is a difficult phenomenon in the schools' teachers. The teachers may know that the problems for effective inclusion environments is not include in the boundary of the teachers's abilities and endeavors.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 4
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 4
      • Ⅰ. 서론 = 1
      • 1. 연구의 의의 = 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 = 4
      • 3. 용어의 정의 = 4
      • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 4
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5
      • 1. 통합교육의 개념 = 5
      • 2. 통합 실천에서의 다양성 = 6
      • 3. 통합교육의 역사 = 7
      • 4. 통합교육에 대한 교사의 인식 수준 = 14
      • Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 18
      • 1. 연구대상 = 18
      • 2. 연구절차 = 19
      • 3. 자료처리 = 21
      • Ⅳ. 결과 및 논의 = 22
      • 1. 통합교육에 대한 인식 = 22
      • 2. 통합교육에 대한 이해 = 25
      • 3. 통합교육에 대한 문제의식 = 28
      • 4. 통합교육에 대한 전문성 = 30
      • 5. 통합교육에 대한 문제해결 방안 = 32
      • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언 = 38
      • 1. 결론 = 38
      • 2. 제언 = 39
      • 참고문헌 = 40
      • 영문초록 = 44
      • 부록 = 46
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼