RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    공공기관 담장녹화에 대한 만족도 분석 : 서울시 4개 구청을 중심으로 = (The) analysis of satisfaction for fence afforestation at goverment buildings : focused on the 4 ward offices in Seoul

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8392618

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this research, we surveyed what civilians feel about afforestation at government buildings. Then we made our conjecture about which factors contribute to their satisfaction. We hope our research will help government building architects and maintainers create more user-friendly environment than before. In this study, we focus on how open spaces are used.
    We visited ward offices in Seoul and studied the basic afforestation guide lines. Then we divided afforestation policies into four categories and polled the visitors at four different ward offices that represent each category. From the poll we could learn the visitors' characteristics and how they utilized the open space in government offices. Over the study we conclude that there are six factors that contribute to the satisfaction of the visitors to afforested government buildings.
    The main results can be summarized as follows.
    1. Visitors gave higher scores on avenue type and park type offices than offices with parterres and/or decorative crags.
    2. Street fence type ward offices got more points at accessibility, sensibility of space, openness, greenness and decorativeness. Park type ward offices had better lounges and facilities for cultural activities. Offices with decorative crags and/or partrres scored the highest points at convenience facilities and more facilities and equipment for exercise and recreation. Perspective fence type offices got very good evaluation for stability and chaoticness.
    3. The fifteen variables that were set to survey the degree of satisfaction for different types of afforestation could be grouped to six categories. If we compare the standardized coefficient of regression, what mattered most to the evaluators were how decorative, how side of form good-looking, how chaotic, and side of silence equipment the office is.
    Over the research, we conclude that those who are responsible for afforestation at government offices should reflect the information gathered from being aware of the factors that influence satisfaction of civilians and characteristics of the visitors and the place, through careful examination of civilians' expectations on the space in question and their reactions.
    번역하기

    In this research, we surveyed what civilians feel about afforestation at government buildings. Then we made our conjecture about which factors contribute to their satisfaction. We hope our research will help government building architects and maint...

    In this research, we surveyed what civilians feel about afforestation at government buildings. Then we made our conjecture about which factors contribute to their satisfaction. We hope our research will help government building architects and maintainers create more user-friendly environment than before. In this study, we focus on how open spaces are used.
    We visited ward offices in Seoul and studied the basic afforestation guide lines. Then we divided afforestation policies into four categories and polled the visitors at four different ward offices that represent each category. From the poll we could learn the visitors' characteristics and how they utilized the open space in government offices. Over the study we conclude that there are six factors that contribute to the satisfaction of the visitors to afforested government buildings.
    The main results can be summarized as follows.
    1. Visitors gave higher scores on avenue type and park type offices than offices with parterres and/or decorative crags.
    2. Street fence type ward offices got more points at accessibility, sensibility of space, openness, greenness and decorativeness. Park type ward offices had better lounges and facilities for cultural activities. Offices with decorative crags and/or partrres scored the highest points at convenience facilities and more facilities and equipment for exercise and recreation. Perspective fence type offices got very good evaluation for stability and chaoticness.
    3. The fifteen variables that were set to survey the degree of satisfaction for different types of afforestation could be grouped to six categories. If we compare the standardized coefficient of regression, what mattered most to the evaluators were how decorative, how side of form good-looking, how chaotic, and side of silence equipment the office is.
    Over the research, we conclude that those who are responsible for afforestation at government offices should reflect the information gathered from being aware of the factors that influence satisfaction of civilians and characteristics of the visitors and the place, through careful examination of civilians' expectations on the space in question and their reactions.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 과정 = 4
    • 1. 연구의 범위 = 4
    • 2. 연구 과정 = 4
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 과정 = 4
    • 1. 연구의 범위 = 4
    • 2. 연구 과정 = 4
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 제1절 공공기관 담장녹화사업 = 7
    • 1. 추진경위 및 배경 = 7
    • 2. 추진실적 = 8
    • 1)서울특별시 공공기관 담장녹화사업 = 8
    • 2) 대구광역시 담장허물기운동 = 11
    • 제2절 선행연구 고찰 = 13
    • 제3장 연구방법 = 16
    • 제1절 연구대상지 선정 = 16
    • 1. 구청 오픈 스페이스 유형 선정 = 16
    • 2. 조사대상 구청 선정 = 18
    • 1) 예비조사 = 18
    • 2) 조사대상 구청 선정 = 20
    • 3. 조사대상지역 개요 = 22
    • 1) 노원구 = 22
    • 2) 강서구 = 23
    • 3) 서초구 = 24
    • 4) 중구 = 25
    • 제2절 조사방법 = 27
    • 1. 설문구성 = 27
    • 2. 설문조사 = 27
    • 제3절 분석방법 = 28
    • 제4장 결과 및 고찰 = 30
    • 제1절 이용자 속성 및 실태분석 = 30
    • 1. 이용자 속성분석 = 30
    • 2. 이용실태 분석 = 35
    • 제2절 담장녹화 유형별 만족도 분석 = 41
    • 1. 담장녹화 유형별 만족도 분석 = 41
    • 2. 만족요인 분석 = 42
    • 1) 만족변수 측정치 분석 = 42
    • 2) 인자행열표 분석 = 45
    • 3) 만족도 결정요인 분석 = 46
    • 제3절 담장녹화 유형별 이용의사 분석 = 48
    • 제5장 결론 및 제언 = 51
    • 제1절 연구의 종합 및 요약 = 51
    • 제2절 공공기관 담장녹화 계획 및 개선방향에 대한 제언 = 54
    • 참고문헌 = 56
    • ABSTRACT = 58
    • 부록: 설문지 = 60
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼