RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    TAI 협동학습이 아동의 수학과 학업성취와 자아존중감에 미치는 효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8354918

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the TAI(Team - Assisted Individualization) on the academic achievement of elementary mathematics and self-esteem. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows;
    First, is there any difference between the group of TAI and that of traditional instruction by ability on the academic achievement of mathematics?
    Second, is there any difference between the group of TAI and that of traditional instruction by ability on self-esteem?
    The main hypotheses tested were as follows:
    (1) The high group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (2) The low group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional Instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (3) The high group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    (4) The low group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    The subjects in this study were 80(2 class) second-grade elementary school students. Each class was assigned to the experimental and control groups. Experimental group had a TAI cooperative learning and control group had a traditional instruction.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of achievement test and self-esteem inventory to verify group homogeneity, posttest of achievement and self-esteem to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores of achievement test and self-esteem inventory. The TAI cooperative learning method was applied to test the effects of treatment.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental - control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 9.0. The significance level was 5%.
    The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) The high group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (2) The low group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (3) There was no significant difference between the high group of TAI and that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    (4) The low group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    Consequently, while research hypothesis 3 was rejected, hypotheses 1, 2, 4 were accepted.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the TAI(Team - Assisted Individualization) on the academic achievement of elementary mathematics and self-esteem. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows; Fi...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the TAI(Team - Assisted Individualization) on the academic achievement of elementary mathematics and self-esteem. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows;
    First, is there any difference between the group of TAI and that of traditional instruction by ability on the academic achievement of mathematics?
    Second, is there any difference between the group of TAI and that of traditional instruction by ability on self-esteem?
    The main hypotheses tested were as follows:
    (1) The high group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (2) The low group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional Instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (3) The high group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    (4) The low group of TAI would be higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    The subjects in this study were 80(2 class) second-grade elementary school students. Each class was assigned to the experimental and control groups. Experimental group had a TAI cooperative learning and control group had a traditional instruction.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of achievement test and self-esteem inventory to verify group homogeneity, posttest of achievement and self-esteem to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores of achievement test and self-esteem inventory. The TAI cooperative learning method was applied to test the effects of treatment.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental - control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 9.0. The significance level was 5%.
    The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) The high group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (2) The low group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of mathematics.
    (3) There was no significant difference between the high group of TAI and that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    (4) The low group of TAI was higher than that of traditional instruction on self-esteem.
    Consequently, while research hypothesis 3 was rejected, hypotheses 1, 2, 4 were accepted.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 4
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 4
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 5
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 6
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 7
    • 1. 협동학습과 TAI = 7
    • 2. TAI 협동학습과 학업성취 = 21
    • 3. TAI 협동학습과 자아존중감 = 26
    • III. 연구 방법 = 29
    • 1. 실험 대상 = 29
    • 2. 실험 설계 = 30
    • 3. 실험 도구 = 31
    • 4. 실험 절차 = 33
    • 5. 자료 분석 = 37
    • IV. 결과 및 논의 = 38
    • 1. 결과 = 38
    • 2. 논의 = 40
    • V. 결론 및 제언 = 45
    • 참고문헌 = 47
    • 영문초록 = 49
    • 부록 = 51
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼