RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    共同住宅 居住家口의 住居選擇 行態에 관한 硏究 = (A)Study on the housing choice behavior of multi-family housing residents

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8301143

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    People try to get a house which is well-corresponded with lifestyle and housing consciousness and housing space. If the relationships among them are not balanced, residents move to and choose another house in order to embody their housing needs. This adjustment behavior stems from their housing dissatisfaction through housing choice consequence.
    So the residential mobility and the housing choice procedures play a significant role on household´s welfare. Households experience a typical procedure on the residential mobility and the housing choice. This procedure consists of several steps. We need to analyze the whole procedure because it makes us to predict the orientations and the
    concerns of the residents´ housing needs through the procedure. There may be some differences of residential mobility and housing choice from each group which exist in urban area, therefore we need to apply some policies about housing choice according to those various groups or classes.
    This thesis aims to analyze the housing choice process and behavior of multi-family housing residents in Pusan. The survey for 667 residents of apartment in Pusan was performed.
    The result in this thesis is the following ;
    1. The housing choice procedure consists of ① a step for recognition of residential situation and for embodying moving motives(Moving motives step), ② a step for searching housing information(Housing search step), ③ a step for establishing a standard criterior of evaluation the housing choice alternatives(Assessment of housing alternative step), ④ a step for housing choice(Housing choice step) and ⑤ a step for having the intention to move(Intention to move step).
    2. There are some linkages with each steps. The higher the level of moving motives, the higher the level of housing search efforts. The higher the level of housing search efforts, the higher the level of housing alternative evaluating. The higher the level of housing alternative evaluating, the higher the level of housing satisfaction after they choose a house. The higher the level of housing satisfaction after they choose a house, the lower the level of intention to move. So the whole procedure of housing choice has a main streaming throughout the steps.
    3. We clarify the housing strata among urban multi-family housing residents. The housing strata were made of 5 indexes-tenure type, number of room, floor size, price per pyung(坪), subjective quality of neighbor. And we classified 3 groups which are the highest group, the medium group and the lowest group.
    4. We reveal that the housing choice behavior differs on each steps according to the housing strata, and grasp the typical and important tendency of residents in deciding a housing issue through analysis of the housing choice behavior according to housing strata. So housing supply and housing policy should be applied distinctively according to housing strata.
    5. The lowest group of housing strata was motivated with job oppertunity and period of house lease, buying an own house. The medium group with shortage of space and improvement of house facilities. The highest group with improvment for quality of neighbor.
    6. The higher the housing strata, the more the level of searching efforts and evaluating housing alternative. The lowest group of housing strata choose a house in terms of accessibility to job and children´s school, market and prefer to intimacy of neighbor. The highest goup choose a house in terms of natural conditions and quality of neighbor.
    7. The higher the housing strata, the higher the level of housing satisfaction, and also the lower the level of intention to move. But long-term intention to move is affected by family´s housing aspirations, expectation for their future quality of life, and family´s long-term plan eventhough housing satisfaction level is high.
    번역하기

    People try to get a house which is well-corresponded with lifestyle and housing consciousness and housing space. If the relationships among them are not balanced, residents move to and choose another house in order to embody their housing needs. This ...

    People try to get a house which is well-corresponded with lifestyle and housing consciousness and housing space. If the relationships among them are not balanced, residents move to and choose another house in order to embody their housing needs. This adjustment behavior stems from their housing dissatisfaction through housing choice consequence.
    So the residential mobility and the housing choice procedures play a significant role on household´s welfare. Households experience a typical procedure on the residential mobility and the housing choice. This procedure consists of several steps. We need to analyze the whole procedure because it makes us to predict the orientations and the
    concerns of the residents´ housing needs through the procedure. There may be some differences of residential mobility and housing choice from each group which exist in urban area, therefore we need to apply some policies about housing choice according to those various groups or classes.
    This thesis aims to analyze the housing choice process and behavior of multi-family housing residents in Pusan. The survey for 667 residents of apartment in Pusan was performed.
    The result in this thesis is the following ;
    1. The housing choice procedure consists of ① a step for recognition of residential situation and for embodying moving motives(Moving motives step), ② a step for searching housing information(Housing search step), ③ a step for establishing a standard criterior of evaluation the housing choice alternatives(Assessment of housing alternative step), ④ a step for housing choice(Housing choice step) and ⑤ a step for having the intention to move(Intention to move step).
    2. There are some linkages with each steps. The higher the level of moving motives, the higher the level of housing search efforts. The higher the level of housing search efforts, the higher the level of housing alternative evaluating. The higher the level of housing alternative evaluating, the higher the level of housing satisfaction after they choose a house. The higher the level of housing satisfaction after they choose a house, the lower the level of intention to move. So the whole procedure of housing choice has a main streaming throughout the steps.
    3. We clarify the housing strata among urban multi-family housing residents. The housing strata were made of 5 indexes-tenure type, number of room, floor size, price per pyung(坪), subjective quality of neighbor. And we classified 3 groups which are the highest group, the medium group and the lowest group.
    4. We reveal that the housing choice behavior differs on each steps according to the housing strata, and grasp the typical and important tendency of residents in deciding a housing issue through analysis of the housing choice behavior according to housing strata. So housing supply and housing policy should be applied distinctively according to housing strata.
    5. The lowest group of housing strata was motivated with job oppertunity and period of house lease, buying an own house. The medium group with shortage of space and improvement of house facilities. The highest group with improvment for quality of neighbor.
    6. The higher the housing strata, the more the level of searching efforts and evaluating housing alternative. The lowest group of housing strata choose a house in terms of accessibility to job and children´s school, market and prefer to intimacy of neighbor. The highest goup choose a house in terms of natural conditions and quality of neighbor.
    7. The higher the housing strata, the higher the level of housing satisfaction, and also the lower the level of intention to move. But long-term intention to move is affected by family´s housing aspirations, expectation for their future quality of life, and family´s long-term plan eventhough housing satisfaction level is high.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제목차례
    • 제Ⅰ장 서론 = 1
    • Ⅰ-1. 연구의 배경 = 1
    • Ⅰ-2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • Ⅰ-3. 연구내용 및 방법 = 3
    • 제목차례
    • 제Ⅰ장 서론 = 1
    • Ⅰ-1. 연구의 배경 = 1
    • Ⅰ-2. 연구의 목적 = 3
    • Ⅰ-3. 연구내용 및 방법 = 3
    • Ⅰ-4. 용어 정의 = 6
    • 제Ⅱ장 주거선택의 이론적 접근 = 8
    • Ⅱ-1. 형태적 접근(Behavioral approaches) = 10
    • Ⅱ-2. 주거선택의 단계 고찰 = 15
    • Ⅱ-3. 주거선택의 단계설정 = 23
    • Ⅱ-3-1. 주거이동동기 생성단계(선택 후의 향후 이주의도 단계) = 23
    • Ⅱ-3-2. 주거탐색 단계 = 27
    • Ⅱ-3-3. 주거대안평가 단계 = 31
    • Ⅱ-3-4. 주거선택 단계 = 33
    • Ⅱ-4. 주거계층의 개념 = 39
    • 제Ⅲ장. 실증연구의 설계 = 44
    • Ⅲ-1. 연구가설의 설정 = 44
    • Ⅲ-2. 조사도구의 구성 = 44
    • Ⅲ-3. 조사의 개요 = 46
    • Ⅲ-4. 분석모형 = 48
    • Ⅲ-5. 연구변인의 구성 및 측정 = 49
    • Ⅲ-5-1. 주거이동동기 생성 단계 = 49
    • Ⅲ-5-2. 주거탐색 단계 = 49
    • Ⅲ-5-3. 주거대안평가 단계 = 49
    • Ⅲ-5-4. 주거선택 단계 = 50
    • Ⅲ-5-5. 향후 이주의도 = 50
    • Ⅲ-6. 조사대상 가구의 일반적 특성 = 51
    • 제Ⅳ장. 주거선택 단계 검증 = 54
    • Ⅳ-1. 연구모형 = 55
    • Ⅳ-2. 모형의 변수 구성 = 58
    • Ⅳ-3. LISREL 분석 = 61
    • Ⅳ-3-1. 상관구조 = 62
    • Ⅳ-3-2. 모수의 추정 및 유의성 검증 = 62
    • Ⅳ-3-3. 모형 적합도 = 64
    • Ⅳ-3-4. 주거선택 단계의 최적모형 = 65
    • Ⅳ-3-5. LISREL의 효과분석 = 66
    • Ⅳ-4. 소결 = 68
    • 제Ⅴ장. 주거선택 단계별 행태 분석 = 68
    • Ⅴ-1. 주거계층의 구성 = 69
    • Ⅴ-1-1. 주거계층의 사회인구학적 특성 = 71
    • Ⅴ-1-2. 라이프스타일과의 관계 = 72
    • Ⅴ-1-3. 주택소유형태 = 76
    • Ⅴ-1-4. 주택규모(분양면적과 방 수) = 76
    • Ⅴ-1-5. 평당가격 = 77
    • Ⅴ-1-6. 주관적 주거지 수준 = 77
    • Ⅴ-2. 주거선택 단계별 행태 = 78
    • Ⅴ-2-1. 주거이동동기 생성단계 = 79
    • 1. 조사대상가구의 이동동기 = 79
    • 2. 주거계층별 주거이동동기 분석 = 79
    • 3. 조사대상가구 및 주거계층별 이동성향 = 81
    • Ⅴ-2-2. 주거탐색 단계 = 84
    • 1. 조사대상가구의 주거탐색 = 84
    • 2. 주거계층별 주거탐색 = 86
    • Ⅴ-2-3. 주거대안평가 단계 = 88
    • 1. 조사대상가구의 주거대안평가 = 88
    • 2. 주거계층별 주거대안평가 = 89
    • 3. 주거계층별 대안평가의 상세항목 = 90
    • Ⅴ-2-4. 주거선택 단계 = 93
    • 1. 조사대상가구의 주거선택 = 93
    • 2. 주거계층별 주거선택 = 95
    • Ⅴ-2-5. 향후 이주의도 단계 = 99
    • 1. 조사대상가구의 향후 이주의도 = 99
    • 2. 주거계층별 향후 이주의도 = 101
    • 3. 사례연구 = 102
    • Ⅴ-3. 소결 = 112
    • 제Ⅵ장 결론 = 116
    • 참고문헌 = 119
    • 부록 = 129
    • ABSTRACT = 145
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼