RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    고층사무소건물의 평면결정 요인에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8186878

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      경산 : 嶺南大學校 大學院, 2002

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2002

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • KDC

      050 판사항(4)

    • 발행국(도시)

      경상북도

    • 형태사항

      v, 108 p. : 揷圖 ; 26 cm

    • 소장기관
      • 국립경국대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 영남대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is systemizing application process of plan determining factors, and their interrelation, through study on characteristic of several factors and interacton to plan decision.
    The result of this study, limited over 30 story high-rise office building in Seoul, are as follow.
    The plan of high-rise office building have more restraints and considerations than that of general building.
    Many factors in each step determine plan from schematic step (building use, building scale, demands of user, selection of site, etc.) to designing step that size and shape of practical is concreted.
    ①It is classified that plan of office building is mostly inflaenced by leasing-type which can be said intention of design, leasing-type is classified as Building of office owns, mixed leasing building, and clear leasing use building and each characteristic is manifested.
    It is manifested that symbolizing characteristic and public identity are important to building of office owns, economic benefits are important to clear leasing use building, and intention to accomodate both appear certainly in mixed leasing building. This trend influence to plan-determining by being reflected in usage of site and shape of building
    ②Usage of site and shape of building were differentiated as leasing-type. Building of office owns as the usage of site bring into relief of company to offer public space in exterior and robby of building, clear leasing use building turned up space program to secure maximum building area at site.
    mixed leasing buildin have to select either public identify nor efficient usage of site. This usage of site influenced directly to shape of plan and condition which shape of plan determine as shape if site appeared.
    Also, Building plan was determined by building shape occasionally. This trend appeared in building of office owns mainly, and efficiency and convenience of plan reduced, because vertical zoning was conducted after determining building shape. Because effect of landmark by height is sufficient, it is difficult to find out other aesthetic figure in building shape.
    ③Influence over practical use of site, shape of building, structure and etc. comes out in practical shape and size are core, standard floorarea, leasing span, floor height, and etc.
    This determining factors determin plan by being selected with optimum under condition of each building is.
    Core type was selected by design intention Eccentric aore was selected to offer non-obstacle space that is able to increase ratio of rentable area and, center core was selected to circulation of space and equal distribution of moving line in building.
    Also, a rectangle-central core was accommodated to compose bisected space in mixed leasing building.
    Mostly, stand floor area was determined by site conditions and regulation(building coverage). The length og leasing span was determined by location or size of core, and floor height appeared differently as the grade of intended I.T.
    Plan of tall building formed by determing factors must be flexible space to correspond change of user's business, and must be correspond with spatial composition correspnding I.T by technical development.
    Delicate design accepting all conditions is inevitable in plan-design of tall building, and spatial composition, only aimed economic benefit, is not desirable.
    Determining factors and te reciprocal action is determine shape and size in plan of tall bilding within a country, was investigated on this study. It is not to speak of importance over plan design in tall bilding.
    (But it is considered that)
    Unfortunately, objectified plan-determining process didn't be concreted, because object of case-study was limited in this study.
    It is necessary that we offer research data be able to standards, plan determining factors in tall building design, by objectifying plan-determining process through the research of more tall building, and the wide-ranging establishment and research of plan-determining factors.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is systemizing application process of plan determining factors, and their interrelation, through study on characteristic of several factors and interacton to plan decision. The result of this study, limited over 30 story hig...

    The purpose of this study is systemizing application process of plan determining factors, and their interrelation, through study on characteristic of several factors and interacton to plan decision.
    The result of this study, limited over 30 story high-rise office building in Seoul, are as follow.
    The plan of high-rise office building have more restraints and considerations than that of general building.
    Many factors in each step determine plan from schematic step (building use, building scale, demands of user, selection of site, etc.) to designing step that size and shape of practical is concreted.
    ①It is classified that plan of office building is mostly inflaenced by leasing-type which can be said intention of design, leasing-type is classified as Building of office owns, mixed leasing building, and clear leasing use building and each characteristic is manifested.
    It is manifested that symbolizing characteristic and public identity are important to building of office owns, economic benefits are important to clear leasing use building, and intention to accomodate both appear certainly in mixed leasing building. This trend influence to plan-determining by being reflected in usage of site and shape of building
    ②Usage of site and shape of building were differentiated as leasing-type. Building of office owns as the usage of site bring into relief of company to offer public space in exterior and robby of building, clear leasing use building turned up space program to secure maximum building area at site.
    mixed leasing buildin have to select either public identify nor efficient usage of site. This usage of site influenced directly to shape of plan and condition which shape of plan determine as shape if site appeared.
    Also, Building plan was determined by building shape occasionally. This trend appeared in building of office owns mainly, and efficiency and convenience of plan reduced, because vertical zoning was conducted after determining building shape. Because effect of landmark by height is sufficient, it is difficult to find out other aesthetic figure in building shape.
    ③Influence over practical use of site, shape of building, structure and etc. comes out in practical shape and size are core, standard floorarea, leasing span, floor height, and etc.
    This determining factors determin plan by being selected with optimum under condition of each building is.
    Core type was selected by design intention Eccentric aore was selected to offer non-obstacle space that is able to increase ratio of rentable area and, center core was selected to circulation of space and equal distribution of moving line in building.
    Also, a rectangle-central core was accommodated to compose bisected space in mixed leasing building.
    Mostly, stand floor area was determined by site conditions and regulation(building coverage). The length og leasing span was determined by location or size of core, and floor height appeared differently as the grade of intended I.T.
    Plan of tall building formed by determing factors must be flexible space to correspond change of user's business, and must be correspond with spatial composition correspnding I.T by technical development.
    Delicate design accepting all conditions is inevitable in plan-design of tall building, and spatial composition, only aimed economic benefit, is not desirable.
    Determining factors and te reciprocal action is determine shape and size in plan of tall bilding within a country, was investigated on this study. It is not to speak of importance over plan design in tall bilding.
    (But it is considered that)
    Unfortunately, objectified plan-determining process didn't be concreted, because object of case-study was limited in this study.
    It is necessary that we offer research data be able to standards, plan determining factors in tall building design, by objectifying plan-determining process through the research of more tall building, and the wide-ranging establishment and research of plan-determining factors.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 1.3 관련연구의 동향 = 4
    • 목차
    • 제1장 서론 = 1
    • 1.1 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
    • 1.2 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 3
    • 1.3 관련연구의 동향 = 4
    • 제2장 고층사무소건물의 특성과 계획시 고려사항 = 6
    • 2.1 건물의 고층화 = 6
    • 2.1.1 고층건물의 정의 = 6
    • 2.1.2 건물 고층화의 의의와 배경 = 9
    • 2.2 고층사무소건물의 사회적 영향 = 13
    • 2.2.1 사회문화적 측면 = 14
    • 2.2.2 도시환경적 측면 = 16
    • 2.3 고층사무소건물의 계획 과정 = 18
    • 2.3.1 건물 형태의 결정 = 18
    • 2.3.2 구조시스템의 선정 = 19
    • 2.3.3 평면계획 = 20
    • 2.3.4 단면계획 = 23
    • 2.3.5 건축설비 시스템 = 25
    • 2.3.6 입면계획 = 26
    • 2.3.7 외부공간 계획 = 28
    • 제3장 고층사무소건물의 평면결정요인 = 30
    • 3.1 기획 단계의 결정요인 = 30
    • 3.1.1 용도·업무조직 및 인텔리전트화에 따른 결정요인 = 30
    • 3.1.2 대지 및 법규상의 결정요인 = 39
    • 3.2 초기 계획 단계의 결정요인 = 45
    • 3.2.1 건물의 형태(Mass) = 45
    • 3.2.2 구조 시스템 = 50
    • 3.3 계획 단계의 결정요인 = 56
    • 3.3.1 계획 모듈(Planning Module) = 56
    • 3.3.2 임대스판(Lease Span) = 60
    • 3.3.3 층고(Floor-to-Floor Height) = 64
    • 3.3.4 기준층 면적(Typical Floor Area) = 67
    • 3.3.5 코어(Core) = 69
    • 3.4 평면결정요인간의 상호관계 = 72
    • 3.4.1 평면결정요인간의 상호관계 = 72
    • 3.4.2 계획 과정에 나타나는 평면결정요인들의 작용 = 73
    • 제4장 고층사무소건물의 평면 결정 요인에 대한 사례분석 = 75
    • 4.1 고층사무소건물 사례분석의 개요 = 75
    • 4.1.1 사례분석대상의 선정배경과 범위 = 75
    • 4.1.2 사례분석의 범위 및 방법 = 76
    • 4.2 고층사무소건물의 사례분석 = 77
    • 4.2.1 사례분석 대상 건물의 개요 = 77
    • 4.2.2 대상 건물의 분석 = 90
    • 4.2.3 분석의 종합 = 96
    • 제5장 결론 = 99
    • 참고 및 인용문헌 = 102
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼