현대 국어 특수조사 연구 : 의존명사, 접미사와의 구분을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study ultimately aims at classifying "some Particles, a dependent noun and a derivational suffix" that was raised a question in setting up the list of some Particles.
A main subject of this article is first analyzing a (natural) disposition of some Particles distinguished from a dependent noun and a derivational suffix and after on the basis of that work, telling it from not fixed elements.
The main subjects of this study are as follow.
'끼리, 대로, 뿐, 들, 씩, 만큼'
At first it is needed to constitute a sample group of the subjects for verification to inquire into the general characteristic of some Particles, therefore the subjects of this article is commonly asserted a nine list(까지, 나마, 는, 도, 라도, 마저, 만, 야, 조차) in former studies as like.
The characteristic of some Particles resulted from analyzing a common nine list is as follow and that is a new major criterion of some Particles distinguished from "a dependent noun and a derivational suffix."
The essential criterion
a : It is possible for some Particles to function the marking of an indirect case that compensate for the nominative case.
b : Some Particles premises a sister clause and has a function to induce an implication connected with a sister clause.
The subsidiary criterion
c : Some Particles combines with the syntax composition.
d: Some Particles is not restricted to a vocabulary speciality in combining with a substantive.
e : It is possible for some Particles to combine with not only a substantive but also an adverb.
This asserted "The essential criterion" is also explained as an necessarily demanded criterion classifying "some Particles, a dependent noun and a derivational suffix."
However this is an another question to prove effective in telling some Particles from other category.
Because this criterion is the characteristic of some Particles distinguished a dependent noun and a derivational suffix, namely a "electively applicable criterion" in drawing a line with this ones.
As a result of analysis through this criterion, I will show that just '끼리, 뿐' is accepted as some Particles among '끼리, 대로, 뿐, 들, 씩, 만큼', '씩, 대로, 만큼' is identified as a postposition and '대로' is not some Particles, and I will anticipate the rest unstudied in following chance. Most of all, this article points to make clear that "what is the (natural) disposition native to the elements that constitute one category."
Language is historically not a fixed single form but the whole of constantly variable elements.
Therefore it is also impossible for that's rule to be fixed, but considering it formally, as a matter of fact a category made by a regular principle has the (natural) disposition distinguished from other category.
Historically a steadily changing "appearance" can be recognized concretely only in understanding "inherent frame and the (natural) disposition that compose it."

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• 1. 서론 = 1
• 1.1 연구의 목적과 구성 = 1
• 1.2 선행 연구 검토 및 문제점 = 3
• 1.3 연구대상의 설정 = 5
• 2. 특수조사의 성격 = 8
• 2.1 특수조사의 특성 및 검증 기준의 설정 = 8
• 2.2 다른 요소와의 구별 문제 = 23
• 2.2.1 접미사와의 구별 = 24
• 2.2.2 의존명사와의 구별 = 26
• 3. 특수조사 구분의 실제 = 30
• 3.1 특수조사와 접미사- 들, 끼리, 씩 = 30
• 3.1.1 들 = 30
• 3.1.2 끼리 = 32
• 3.1.3 씩 = 34
• 3.2 특수조사와 의존명사 - 뿐, 대로, 만큼 = 37
• 3.2.1 뿐 = 37
• 3.2.2 대로,만큼 = 45
• 4. 결론 = 47
• 참고문헌 = 48
• 영문초록 = 50